JAZO MAQSADLARIGA ERISHISHDA PENITENSIAR SIYOSAT
Kalit so‘zlar:
penitensiar tizim, mahkum, jazo maqsadi, jazoni ijro etish, differensiatsiya.Annotatsiya
Mazkur maqolada penitensiar siyosatning jinoiy jazo qo‘llashdan ko‘zlangan maqsadlarga erishishdagi roli huquqiy jihatdan tahlil etilgan. Muallifning fikricha, jamiyatning yashash sharoitlari qanday bo‘lishidan qat’i nazar, huquqbuzarliklardan jamiyatning o‘zini o‘zi himoya qilish vositasi sifatida jazo zarurdir. Ko‘plab davlatlarda va umuman hozirgi zamon jinoyat huquqi doktrinasida jazo mahkumni axloqan tuzatish, uning jinoiy faoliyatni davom ettirishiga to‘sqinlik qilish, ijtimoiy adolatni tiklash hamda mahkum, shuningdek, boshqa shaxslar yangi jinoyat sodir etishining oldini olish maqsadida qo‘llanadi. Maqolada xorijiy mamlakatlarning ilgʻor tajribasi hamda huquqshunos olimlarning davlat boshqaruvi shakliga oid bu boradagi yondashuvlari tahlil qilingan. Shu bilan bir qatorda, muallif tomonidan penitensiar siyosat asosiy yo‘nalishlarining o‘ziga xos xususiyatlariga ham huquqiy jihatdan baho berilgan.
Iqtiboslar
1. O‘zbekiston yuridik ensiklopediyasi [Legal encyclopedia of Uzbekistan]. Resp. ed. N. Toychiev. Tashkent, Adolat Publ., 2011, p. 164.
2. Bakaeva F., Lankevich E., Toshboev S. et al. Mahkumlar bilan muomala qilishning minimal standart qoidalari [Minimum standard rules for dealing with prisoners]. Prisoners’ rights: international and national standards. Resp. ed. A. Saidov. Tashkent, Tafakkur Publ., 2011, p. 98.
3. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. Human Rights: Collection of International Treaties, universal agreements. New York, UN, 2002, vol. 1, part 1, p. 20. Available at: http://www.un.org/.
4. Penal Code of the Republic of Belarus. Available at: http://etalonline.by/.
5. Yanchuk I.A. Ob ispol’zovanii otsenki stepeni ispravleniya osuzhdennykh k lisheniyu svobody v protsesse differentsiatsii i individualizatsii ispolneniya nakazaniya [On the use of the assessment of the degree of correction of convicts sentenced to deprivation of liberty in the process of differentiation and individualization of the execution of punishment]. Bulletin of the Federal Penitentiary Service of Russia, 2016, no. 1, p. 52.
6. Vasil’yev V.L. Yuridicheskaya psikhologiya [Legal Psychology]. St. Petersburg, Peter Publ., 2010, p. 575.
7. Shlykov V.V. Organizatsionno-pravovyye osnovy proizvodstvennoy deyatel’nosti ispravitel’nykh koloniy v tselyakh ispravleniya i trudovoy adaptatsii osuzhdennykh [Organizational and legal foundations of the production activities of correctional colonies for the purpose of correction and labor adaptation of convicts]. PhD thesis. Ryazan, 2007, pp. 73–74.
8. Lappi-Seppala T., Kimmo N., Sakari M., Merita H. Penal policy and criminal justice in Finland and other Nordic countries. Introduction to Finish law and legal culture. Helsinki, Unigrafia, 2012,
pp. 215–236.
9. XX asrning 90-yillari boshida Germaniyada “Xavf ostidagilarga yordam” degan rasmiy nom ostida muassasalarning butun bir tarmog‘i tashkil etilgan [In the early 90s of the 20th century, a whole network of institutions was established in Germany under the official name “Help for the vulnerable”].
10. Gavrishkiv B. V nemetskoy tyurme [In German prison]. Crime and Punishment, 2000, no. 1,
p. 44.
11. Aleksandrov YU. Penitentsiarnaya sistema Frantsii [Penitentiary system of France]. Crime and Punishment, 1999, no. 11, p. 41.
12. Najimov M.Sh. Ozodlikdan mahrum qilish jazosini tayinlashning huquqiy asoslari va takomillashtirish muammolari [Legal basis of imprisonment and problems of improvement].
PhD thesis. Tashkent, TSIL, 2010, p. 112.
13. Andreev N.A., Morozov V.M., Kovalev O.G., Debolsky M.G., Morozov A.M. Resotsializatsiya osuzhdennykh v penitentsiarnykh uchrezhdeniyakh FRG (sotsial’no-psikhologicheskiy aspekt) [Resocialization of convicts in penitentiary institutions of Germany (social and psychological aspect]. Moscow, Human Rights, 2001, p. 26.
14. Prestupleniya i nakazaniya v Anglii, SSHA, Frantsii, FRG, Yaponii [Crimes and punishments in England, USA, France, Germany, Japan]. General part of criminal law. Moscow, 1991, p. 67.
15. Salaev N., Khamidov N. Qualification of Smuggling: Uzbek Legislation and Foreign Experience. Ilkogretim Online – Elementary Education Online, 2021, no. 20 (3), pp. 1661–1667. DOI: 10.17051/ilkonline.2021.03.189/.
