ISH YURITISHNI RAD ETISH YOKI TUGATISHDA SHAXSNING VAFOT ETGANLIGI ASOSI: MUAMMO VA YECHIMLAR
Kalit so‘zlar:
vafot etganlik, jinoiy qilmishni sodir etgan shaxs, jinoyat ishini tugatish, rad etish, gumon qilinuvchining vafoti, yaqin qarindoshAnnotatsiya
Ushbu maqolada shaxsning vafoti munosabati bilan ish yuritishni rad etish yoki tugatish bilan bog‘liq protsessual muammolar va mazkur masalalarning huquqiy tartibga solish jihatlari tadqiq etilgan. Shuningdek, maqolada jinoyat ishi doirasida ayblanuvchi tariqasida jalb etilishi lozim bo‘lgan shaxsning vafot etgan vaqtida protsessual maqomi qonunchilikda saqlanganligi, biroq tergovga qadar tekshiruv vaqtida va shaxsning gumon qilinuvchi sifatidagi maqomi bilan bog‘liq protsessual davrda vafot etishi yuzasidan ishni hal etishning keyingi mexanizmi mavjud emasligi borasidagi muammolar va mavzuga oid huquqiy kolliziya, Fuqarolik sudlari tomonidan shaxslarni vafot etgan deb topishning huquqiy oqibatlari jinoyat-protsessual qonunchilikka tatbiq etilishi yuzasidan mavjud huquqiy bo‘shliq ham nazariy, ham amaliy jihatdan o‘rganilib, mazkur tahlillar yuzasidan qonunchilikni takomillashtirish bo‘yicha tegishli qonun va qonunosti hujjatlariga o‘zgartirish va qo‘shimchalar kiritish bo‘yicha takliflar ishlab chiqilgan. Maqolada shaxslarning vafoti bilan bog‘liq huquqiy oqibatlarning qonunchilikda aks etish holati va tahlili tizimli ravishda keltirilgan. Mavzuni yoritishda analiz, sintez, induksiya, deduksiya, qiyosiy-huquqiy tahlil kabi metodlar qo‘llangan. Tadqiqot ishida ilg‘or xorijiy tajriba, ilmiy-nazariy qarashlar va tergov hamda sud amaliyoti tahlil qilingan.
Iqtiboslar
1. Mirziyoyev Sh.M. Buyuk kelajagimizni mard va olijanob xalqimiz bilan birga quramiz [We will build our great future together with our brave and noble people]. Speech at the meeting with voters of Andijan region on November 1, 2016. Tashkent, Uzbekistan, 2017, p. 22.
2. Reference No. 1645 of the Investigative Department of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Republic of Uzbekistan dated 21.03.2022 No. 18/2509. 28.03.2022.
3. Reference of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Uzbekistan dated 11.05.2022 07/13-4853-150- reference number No. 2922. 15.05.2022.
4. Mahmudov S.A. Ayblilik to‘g‘risidagi masalani hal qilmay turib jinoyat ishini tugatishning ayrim jihatlari [Some aspects of ending a criminal case without resolving an issue of guilt]. Lawyer herald, 2020, no. 6, pp. 110–115.
5. Murodov B.B. Jinoyat ishini tugatish: nazariya va amaliyot [Termination of a criminal case: theory and practice]. Tashkent, 2015, p. 86.
6. Vasil’ev F.Yu. Institut otkaza v vozbuzhdenii ugolovnogo dela [Institute of refusal to initiate criminal proceedings]. Abstract of PhD thesis. St. Petersburg, 2016, pp .15-16.
7. Peretokin S.N. Ohkrana prav i svobod cheloveka i grazhdanina pri prekrashhenii ugolovnogo dela [Protection of human and civil rights and freedoms upon termination of a criminal case]. Abstract of PhD thesis. Моsсow, 2006. pp 13–24.
8. Tadqiqot ishi doirasida olib borilgan surishtiruvchi, tergovchi, amaliyotchi va huquqshunoslardan iborat respondentlar jamoasi o‘rtasidagi so‘rov natijalari [The results of a survey among a team of respondents, consisting of an inquiry officer, investigator, practitioner and lawyers, carried out within the framework of the research work].
9. Muhammadiyev A.A. Fuqarolik huquqi tamoyillarining nazariy va amaliy muammolari [Theoretical and practical problems of the principles of civil law]. Тashkent, 2010, p 193.
10. The Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation (dated December 18, 2001);
11. Criminal Procedure Code of the Republic of Azerbaijan. Approved by the Law of the Republic of Azerbaijan No. 907-IQ dated July 14, 2000. Article 39.
12. Criminal Procedure Code of the Republic of Armenia No. ZR-248 of September 1, 1998. Article 35.
13. Criminal Procedure Code of Georgia General Passion Section I Criminal Procedure Legislation and Principles of Tbilisi. October 9, 2009, no. 1772-IIc rm art.105.
14. Japanese criminal-prosessual code – Keydzi-sashe-Ho, 1948, July 10, no. 131 Article 339.
15. Ugolovno-protsessual’noye pravo OAE. Osnovnyye polozheniya stat’ey 20-21 [Criminal Procedure law of the UAE. Main provisions article 20-21].
16. Criminal Procedure Law – Saudi Arabia Criminal Procedure Law Royal Decree, 2001, October 16, no. (M/39). Article 22.
17. Criminal Procedure Act of South Korea – Hansa-son-biop, 1954, September 23, no. 341 Article 328.
18. The Criminal Procedure Code of Estonia. Adopted on 12.02.2003 RT I 2003, 27, 166 Entered into force on 01.07.2004. Article 199. Circumstances precluding criminal proceedings.
19. Аtaniyazov J.K. Problems of legal regulation of circumstances excluding proceedings in the case. Jurisprudence. 2022, no. 5, pp. 165–173.
20. Аtaniyazov J.K. Problems of exemption of persons from criminal liability due to active repentance in consent. Review of Law Sciences. 2022, no. 4, pp. 132–141.
21. Аtaniyazov J.K. Some aspects of protecting the rights and interests of persons in case of refusal to initiate or terminate a criminal case. Jurisprudence. 2023, no. 1, pp. 126–135. DOI: 10.51788/tsul.jurisprudence.3.1./HKEW7923
22. The Criminal Procedure Code of the People’s Republic of China, Ad. at the 2nd session of the National People’s Congress of the Fifth Convocation, 1979, July 1. art.24.
