SANOAT MULKI OBYEKTLARI MUALLIFLARINI RAGʻBATLANTIRISH MASALALARI
Kalit so‘zlar:
intellektual mulk, sanoat mulki obyekti, muallif, ixtiro, foydali model, sanoat namunasi, talabnoma berish, mutlaq huquq, ijtimoiy manfaat, imtiyoz, shaxsiy va mulkiy rag‘batlantirishAnnotatsiya
Ushbu maqolada sanoat mulki obyektlari mualliflarini rag‘batlantirish masalalari ilmiy jihatdan tahlil qilingan bo‘lib, mualliflarni shaxsiy va mulkiy rag‘batlantirish choralari muhokama qilingan. Sanoat mulki obyekti mualliflari uchun nima muhim: ixtironi ommaga oshkor qilishmi va patent olish yoki muayyan obro‘-e’tiborga ega bo‘lish va moddiy manfaatdor bo‘lishmi? Ushbu masalani nazariy va amaliy jihatdan tadqiq etish natijasida muallif bir qator ilmiy taklif va xulosalarni ilgari surgan. Shaxsiy rag‘batlantirish mulkiy rag‘batlantirish bilan bir qatorda mualliflarga katta motivatsiyalar berishi mumkin. Ba’zi mamlakatlar va tashkilotlar intellektual mulk mualliflarini mukofotlar yoki stipendiyalar shaklida shaxsiy rag‘batlantiradi. Mavjud qonunchilik tizimi sanoat mulki obyektlari mualliflari olgan huquqiy himoya hujjati – patent uchun mualliflarni rag‘batlantirish, shu jumladan, ilmiy daraja va unvon berish uchun asos bo‘lishini nazarda tutsa-da, bu borada ko‘rsatkich zamonaviy talablarga to‘liq javob bermaydi. Sanoat mulki obyektlari mualliflarini rag‘batlantirish masalalari murakkab bo‘lib, mualliflarning huquq va jamoat manfaatlarini himoya qilish o‘rtasidagi muvozanatni topish zarur. Shu bilan birga, maqolada nazariyotchi olimlar, tajribali amaliyotchi xodimlarning fikr va mulohazalari tahlil qilingan.
Iqtiboslar
1. Yillik hisobot [Annual report]. Available at: https://my.ima.uz/uploads/files/2021-yillik-hisobot-uz.pdf
2. Savina V.S. Perspektivnyye napravleniya razvitiya prava intellektual’noy sobstvennosti [Promising directions for the development of intellectual property law]. Copyright, 2018, no. 2, pp. 23–36.
3. Bliznes I.A. Voprosy intellektual’noy sobstvennosti [Intellectual property issues]. Moscow, 2004, 495 p.
4. Omarova Yu.A. Sredstva individualizatsii grazhdan [Means of individualization of citizens]. Aktual’nyye problemy rossiyskogo prava – Actual Problems of Russian Law, 2018, no. 6 (91), pp. 75–81. DOI: 10.17803/1994-1471.2018.91.6.075-081
5. Abil Abadín A. La moda como referente. La huella internacional de las marcas españoles de moda [Fashion as a reference. The international footprint of Spanish fashion brands]. 2017, pp. 10–11.
6. Ruiz Moreno M.F. The triangle of business success: Innovation, brand and exports. Alicante. Spanish Patent and Trademark Office, Association for the Defense of the Brand, 2016, 97 p.
7. Otero Lastres J.M., Fernandez-Novoa C., Botana Agra J. M. Manual of Industrial Property. 3rd ed. Madrid, Marcial Pons Publ., 2017, p. 781.
8. Long C. Patent signals. The University of Chicago Law Review, 2022, no. 69, pp. 625–679. DOI: 10.2307/1600501
9. Long J.S., Freese J. Regression models for categorical dependent variables using STATA. 2nd ed. College Station, Stata Press Publ., 2006.
10. Jensen K., Murray F. The intellectual property landscape of the human genome. Science, 2005, pp. 239–240. DOI: 10.1126/science.1120014
11. Göktepe-Hulten D., Mahagaonkar P. Inventing and patenting activities of scientists: in the expectation of money or reputation? The Journal of Technology Transfer, 2010, vol. 35, pp. 401–423.
12. Rahmatov A. Sportda intellektual mulkni shartnomaviy tartibga solish masalalari [Issues of contractual regulation of intellectual property in sports]. Lawyer Newsletter, 2021, no. 1, p. 64.
13. Bliznes I.A. Voprosy intellektual’noy sobstvennosti [Intellectual property issues]. Moscow, 2004, 495 p.
14. Dmitriyeva Ye.O., Dmitriyev O.V. Ob’’yekty prava promyshlennoy sobstvennosti v ispanskom zakonodatel’stve [Objects of industrial property rights in Spanish law]. Bulletin of Omsk University, Series “Right”, 2019, p. 41.
15. Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA). Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/trade/tackling-unfair-trade/acta/
16. Beijing Treaty on Audiovisual Performances. 2012, June 26. Available at: http://www.wipo.int/ treaties/en/ip/beijing/beijing_treaty.html
17. Ob’’yedinennyy dokument, kasayushhiysya intellektual’noy sobstvennosti i geneticheskikh resursov [Consolidated Instrument on Intellectual Property and Genetic Resources]. Available at: http://www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/tk/ru/wipo_grtkf_ic_20/wipo_grtkf_ic_20_ref_facilitators_text.pdf
18. Leahy-Smith America Invents Act. Patent Reform Act 2011. Available at: http://www.uspto.gov/aia_implementation/20110916-pub-l112-29.pdf
19. United states patent and trade mark office. Available at: http://www.uspto.gov/patents/law/aipa/ index.jsp
20. Commission Regulation (EC) No. 876/2007 of 24 July 2007 amending Regulation (EC) No. 2245/2002 implementing Council Regulation (EC) No. 6/2002 on Community designs.
21. Dids Macdonald. Safeguarding Design Assets: A UK Perspective. Available at: http://www.wipo.int/wipo_magazine/en/2012/01/article_0005.html
22. Owen-Smith J., Powell W. Careers and contradictions: Faculty responses to the transformation of knowledge and its uses in the life sciences research. Sociology of Work, 2001, no. 10, pp. 109–140. DOI: 10.1016/S0277-2833(01)80023-6
23. Owen-Smith J., Powell W. The expanding role of university patenting in the life sciences: Assessing the importance of experience and connectivity. Research Policy, 2003, no. 32, pp. 1695–1711. DOI: 10.1016/S0048-7333(03)00045-3
24. Higher Attestation Commission under the Ministry of Higher Education, Science and Innovation of the Republic of Uzbekistan. Available at: https://oak.uz/pages/9049
