ZARURIY MUDOFAA CHEGARASIDAN CHETGA CHIQIB VA KUCHLI RUHIY HAYAJONLANISH HOLATIDA QASDDAN ODAM O‘LDIRISHNING FARQLI JIHATLARI

Mualliflar

Kalit so‘zlar:

affekt, zaruriy mudofaa chegarasidan chetga chiqish, kuchli ruhiy hayajonlanish, qasddan odam o‘ldirish, jinoyat, jazo, javobgarlik

Annotatsiya

Mazkur maqolada zaruriy mudofaa chegarasidan chetga chiqib va kuchli ruhiy hayajonlanish holatida qasddan odam o‘ldirishning farqli jihatlari yoritilgan. Maqolada ikki vaziyatga, birinchidan, rashk nafaqat er-xotin o‘rtasidagi munosabatlar, balki u kengroq doiradagi insonlar o‘rtasidagi munosabatlarga ham tegishli tushuncha ekanligi hamda rashk hissi ota-ona va farzandlar yoki boshqa qarindoshlar yoxud unashtirilgan yigit va qiz yoki bir-birini sevganlar o‘rtasida ham vujudga kelishi mumkinligi borasidagi fikrlar tahlil etilgan. Ikkinchidan, muallif o‘z fikrini davom ettirib, maqolada rashk haqida fikr yuritayotgan ba’zi olimlar ushbu tushunchani xiyonat yoki bevafolik bilan bog‘lashga harakat qilayotganini ta’kidlaydi. Shuni ham hisobga olish kerakki, er-xotin o‘rtasidagi xiyonat nafaqat xiyonat, balki boshqa bir odam bilan quchoqlashish yoki unga sevgi izhor qilish bilan ham bog‘liq bo‘lishi va rashkni vujudga keltiruvchi juda ko‘p holatlar mavjudligini inobatga olish maqsadga muvofiq. Bundan tashqari, JKning 98-moddasi bo‘yicha qilmishni kvalifikatsiya qilishda muallif rashk tufayli kelib chiqqan kuchli ruhiy hayajonlanish holati to‘satdan va keskin yuz berganligiga e’tibor qaratishning ahamiyatini asoslaydi. 

Iqtiboslar

1. Dybenko V. B. Prestupleniya, sovershennyye v sostoyanii affekta: problemy kvalifikatsii [Crimes committed in a state of passion: problems of qualification]. Law. Society. State, 2021, pp. 14–19.

2. Drozdova D. Yu. Osobennosti rassledovaniya prestupleniy, sovershonnykh v sostoyanii affekta [Features of the investigation of crimes committed in a state of passion]. Proceedings of the scientific-practical conference of students of Kurgan State University, 2021, pp. 13–14.

3. Klimov S.N., Tsarov K.A. Sostoyaniye affekta kak kategoriya ugolovnogo prava: analiz teorii i praktiki [The state of affect as a category of criminal law: an analysis of theory and practice]. Bulletin of the Penza State University, 2022, no. 3 (39), pp. 85–89.

4. Muzychenko P.B., Voznesenskaya A.I. Problemy kvalifikatsii prestupleniy, sovershennykh v sostoyanii affekta [Problems of qualification of crimes committed in a state of passion]. Modern Problems of Criminal Law and Process, 2019, pp. 93–96.

5. Zokirova O. Rashk jinoyatga boshlashi mumkinmi? [Can jealousy lead to crime?]. Life and Law, 2003, no. 1, pp. 27–29.

6. Zokirova O.G‘. Rashk motivi bilan sodir etiladigan jinoyatlarga qarshi kurash muammolari [Problems of combating crimes motivated by jealousy]. Tashkent, TSIL, 2004, 202 p.

7. Mavrenkova Ye. A. Otgranicheniye prestupleniy, sovershonnykh v sostoyanii affekta ot smezhnykh prestupleniy [Separation of crimes committed in a state of passion from related crimes]. Actual Problems of Economics, Management and Law, 2020, pp. 84–90.

8. Stepanova I.B. Revnost’: ugolovno-pravovoy i kriminologicheskiy aspekty [Jealousy: criminal law and criminological aspects]. Ivanovo, IvGU Publ., 1998, p. 15.

9. Luriya A.R. Diagnostika sledov affekta [Diagnostics of traces of affect // Psychology of emotions]. Moscow, Smysl Publ., 1984, p. 230.

10. 2002 from the archives of the Karshi district court of Kashkadarya region. Materials of criminal case, no. 2-135.

11. Zokirova O. Rashk nega g‘ayriqonuniy? [Why jealousy is illegal?]. Life and Law, 2001, no. 4, pp. 50–52.

12. Judicial practice materials were obtained and analyzed on the basis of letter No. 07/14-9432-254 dated July 26, 2022 of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Uzbekistan.

13. Niyozova S.S. Strong Emotional Arousal (Effect) As A Criminal Law Norm. The American Journal of Political Science Law and Criminology, 2021, March 31, pp. 96–102. ISSN 2693-0803. DOI: 10.37547/tajpslc/Volume 03Issuep.03-15.

14. Niyozova S.S. Prevention of Crime in the Family and the Role of Victimology in the Republic of Uzbekistan. International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology, 2020, vol. 29, no. 3, p. 3962.

15. Niyozova S.S. Reasons for Suicide and the Issue of Responsibility. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Research, Dec 2020, vol. 12, Sup. Iss. 3, p. 528.

16. Yusupov R.S. Sootnosheniye affekta i prevysheniya predelov neobkhodimoy oborony [The ratio of affect and exceeding the limits of necessary defense]. Russian Justice, 2001, no. 1, pp. 51–54.

17. Fargiyev I. Sostoyaniye affekta i prevysheniye predelov neobkhodimoy oborony [The state of affect and exceeding the limits of necessary defense]. Russian Justice, 2001, no. 1, p. 55.

18. Collection of decisions of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Uzbekistan. 1991-2006. 2nd ed. Tashkent, Adolat Publ., 2006, vol. 2, pp. 76–77.

Yuklab Olishlar

Nashr qilingan

2026-02-18

Qanday Iqtibos Keltirish

ZARURIY MUDOFAA CHEGARASIDAN CHETGA CHIQIB VA KUCHLI RUHIY HAYAJONLANISH HOLATIDA QASDDAN ODAM O‘LDIRISHNING FARQLI JIHATLARI. (2026). YURISPRUDENSIYA, 3(4), 112-121. https://yurisprudensiya.tsul.uz/index.php/yurisprudensiya/article/view/580