JINOYAT PROTSESSIDA ICHKI ISHONCHGA KO‘RA DALILLARNI BAHOLASHNING NAZARIY MUAMMOLARI

703.1 Relevance & Admissibility [Rules 401, 402]. (2021). https://ncpro.sog.unc.edu/manual/703-1

Astanov, I., & Hamidov, B. (2021). Obshheteoreticheskie voprosy, svyazannye s elektronnymi ili tsifrovymi dokazatelstvami: problema i reshenie [General theoretical issues related to electronic or digital evidence: Problem and solution]. Obshhestvo i innovatsii [Society and Innovations], 2(7/S), 259–278.

Boland, B. (1999). German and American prosecutions: An approach to statistical comparison. Bureau of Justice Statistics, U.S. Department of Justice.

Al-Khawaja and Tahery v. United Kingdom, Applications no. 26766/05 and 22228/06. (2011, December 15). https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{%22itemid%22:[%22001-108072%22]}

Keller v. Russia, Application no. 26824/04. (2013, Octomber 17). https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{%22itemid%22:[%22001-126907%22]}

Schatschaschwili v. Germany, Application no. 9154/10. (2015, December 15). https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{%22itemid%22:[%22001-159566%22]}

Clermont, K. M. (2009). Standards of proof revisited. Vermont Law Review, 33. (Originally presented at the Emotion in Context: Exploring the Interaction between Emotions and Legal Institutions Conference, University of Chicago Law School, May 2008). Cornell Legal Studies Research Paper, 1321029.

Damaška, M. R. (1997). Evidence law adrift. Yale University Press. http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt32bnj3

Esnard, C., & Dumas, R. (2018). L’intime conviction: entre cadres légaux, représentations et pratiques chez les magistrats et jurés en cour d’assises [Personal conviction: between legal frameworks, representations and practices among judges and jurors in the Assize Court]. Bulletin de psychologie [Psychology Bulletin], 559, 53–69.

Federal Rules of Evidence. (2024, December 1). https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/fre

Gramlich, J. (2023). Few federal criminal defendants go to trial and even fewer are acquitted. Pew Research Center.

Hudson v. Michigan, 547 U.S. 586. (2006). https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/547/586/

Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307. (1979). https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/443/307/

Johnson, D. T. (2002). The Japanese way of justice: Prosecuting crime in Japan. Oxford University Press.

Klamberg, M. (2020, February 25). Epistemological controversies and evaluation of evidence in international criminal trials. In K. J. Heller, F. Mégret, S. Nouwen, J. D. Ohlin, & D. Robinson (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of international criminal law (OUP 2020). Stockholm University Research Paper, 65. Faculty of Law.

Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643. (1961). https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/367/643/

Mirazov, D. M. (2016). Dastlabki tergov idoralari faoliyati ustidan kontrol va nazoratni takomillashtirishning nazariy, tashkiliy va protsessual jihatlari [Theoretical, organizational, and procedural aspects of improving control and supervision over preliminary investigation authorities]. [Abstract of DSc Dissertation]. Tashkent, Uzbekistan.

Murodov, B. B. (2018). Jinoyat ishini tugatish institutini takomillashtirish [Improvement of the institution of termination of criminal cases]. [Abstract of DSc Dissertation]. Tashkent, Uzbekistan.

Nix v. Williams, 467 U.S. 431. (1984). https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/467/431/

Pennington, N., & Hastie, R. (1993). The story model for juror decision making. In R. Hastie (Ed.), Inside the juror: The psychology of juror decision making (pp. 192–222). Cambridge University Press.

Rajabov, B. A. (2019). Jinoyat protsessida dalillarni to‘plash, tekshirish va baholash [Collection, examination, and evaluation of evidence in criminal proceedings]. [Monograph]. Tashkent: Academy of the MIA of the Republic of Uzbekistan.

Ramseyer, J. M., & Rasmusen, E. B. (2001). Why is the Japanese conviction rate so high? The Journal of Legal Studies, 30(1), 53–88.

Silverthorne Lumber Co., Inc. v. United States, 251 U.S. 385. (1920). https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/251/385/

Stat.sud.uz. (2025). Jinoyat ishlari bo’yicha statistik ma’lumotlar [Criminal statistics]. https://stat.sud.uz/criminal

Statistisches Bundesamt (Destatis). (2020). Criminal prosecution by the courts in 2019: Convictions up 2.3% on 2018.

Suyunova, D. (2023, June 10). Sovremennye problemy dopustimosti dokazatelstv na stadii sudebnogo razbiratelstva [Contemporary problems of admissibility of evidence at the trial stage]. Society and Innovations.

Thienel, T. (2006). The admissibility of evidence obtained by torture under international law. European Journal of International Law, 17(2), 349–367.

Tuhtasheva, U. (2020). Perspektivy uproshhennogo sudoproizvodstva v ugolovnom processe [Prospects for simplified criminal procedure]. Obshhestvo i innovatsii, [Society and Innovations] 1(1), 189–199.

Tyler, T. R., & Huo, Y. J. (2002). Trust in the law: Encouraging public cooperation with the police and courts. Russell Sage Foundation. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7758/9781610445429

Victor v. Nebraska, 511 U.S. 1. (1994). https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/511/1/

Weigend, T. (2003). Is the criminal process about truth?: A German perspective. Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy, 26, 157.

Wistrich, A. J., & Rachlinski, J. J. (2017, March 16). Implicit bias in judicial decision making: How it affects judgment and what judges can do about it. In Enhancing justice (Chapter 5). American Bar Association. Cornell Legal Studies Research Paper, 17-16.

Wistrich, A. J., Guthrie, C., & Rachlinski, J. J. (2004). Can judges ignore inadmissible information? The difficulty of deliberately disregarding. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 153, 1251.

Wistrich, A. J., Rachlinski, J. J., & Guthrie, C. (2015). Heart versus head: Do judges follow the law or follow their feelings? Texas Law Review, 93, 855–923.