CURRENT PROBLEMS OF GIVING NOTARIES MEDIATORY POWERS
Keywords:
notary, mediation, mediation agreement, mediation activity, mediation functions, tarifAbstract
The implementation of mediator functions by notaries at the moment is a very urgent task that not all notaries in the country perform. However, the demand for this function is only growing, as is the social value, only this area of activity is not actively developing yet, because not all notaries are willing to take on additional functions, given the non-entrepreneurial nature of mediation activities, which is also due to the workload of notaries. This scientific article discusses the features and problems of granting mediation powers to notaries. The purpose of the scientific article is to reveal the legal nature of the performance of mediation functions by notaries, some of the problems associated with this activity and to determine the prospects for their solution. The relevance of the chosen topic in the scientific article is obvious – the possibility of mediation functions by notaries is provided by law, but in practice these cases have not become common, which indicates the need to investigate the factors and problems that hinder the effective implementation of modern legislation in the field of notaries. The methodology consists of research methods, in particular, such methods as dialectical, analysis, synthesis, induction, deduction, generalization, modeling, forecasting are used in the scientific article. The results of the research in the scientific article are aimed at improving law enforcement practice. The general conclusion based on the results of the research in this scientific article is that mediation activities by notaries should be developed and notaries should be encouraged to provide these services in good faith, according to the established tariffs, in order to avoid entrepreneurial risks. In order to expand the mediation activities carried out by notaries, it seems necessary to implement a number of measures aimed at familiarizing society with the value of mediation in the pre-trial settlement of disputes.
References
1. Akhmedova G. Mediatsiya i notarial’naya deyatel’nost’ v Uzbekistane: perspektivy i razvitiye [Mediation and notarial activities in Uzbekistan: prospects and development]. Review of Law Sciences, 2020. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/mediatsiya-i-notarialnaya-deyatelnost-v-uzbekistane-perspektivy-i-razvitie
2. Aleshina T.E. Nekotoryye voprosy mediatsii v praktike rossiyskogo notariata kak sub’’yekta realizatsii okhranitel’noy funktsii prava [Some issues of mediation in the practice of the Russian notaries as a subject of the implementation of the protective function of law]. Vestnik of Saratov State Legal Academy, 2016, no. 1 (108).
3. Busygina Z.I. Nekotoryye aspekty integratsii mediatsii v notaria’lnuyu praktiku [Some aspects of the integration of mediation into notarial practice]. Notarius, 2013, no. 3, p. 4.
4. Dzhurinskaya Ye.A. Mediatsiya v notarial’noy deyatel’nosti: vektor razvitiya [Mediation in notarial activity: vector of development]. Notary Journal, 2019, no. 03, pp. 4–11.
5. Sitko N.G., Maslennikova L.V. Mesto notariusa v mediativnom protsesse [The place of the notary in the mediation process]. Young Scientist, 2017, no. 15, pp. 308–310.
6. Kuropatskaya Ye.G. Notarial’naya deyatel’nost’ v dosudebnom i vnesudebnom poryadke uregulirovaniya pravovykh konfliktov [Notarial activities in pre-trial and out-of-court settlement of legal conflicts]. Notary Journal, 2020, no. 01, pp. 27–35.
7. Fomin V.A. Notariat kak odin iz sposobov vnesudebnogo uregulirovaniya grazhdanskikh otnosheniy [Notaries as one of the ways of out-of-court settlement of civil relations]. Notary Journal, 2013, no. 06, p. 6.
8. Udostovereniye mediativnogo soglasheniya notariusom [Certification of a mediation agreement by a notary]. Site of the notary Leksakova Ekaterina Olegovna. 2019. Avialable at: https://lexakova.ru/press-centr/udostoverenie-mediativnogo-soglasheniya-notariusom
9. Romanovskaya O.V. Notariat v Rossii i Germanii: opyt pravovoy komparativistiki [Notaries in Russia and Germany: the experience of legal comparative studies]. Science. Society. State, 2020. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/notariat-v-rossii-i-germanii-opyt-pravovoy-komparativistiki
10. Tanichev G.V. Kontrol’ za deyatel’nost’yu notariusa v Rossiyskoy Federatsii i zarubezhnykh stranakh: sravnitel’nyy analiz [Control over the activities of a notary in the Russian Federation and foreign countries: a comparative analysis]. International Journal of the Humanities and Natural Sciences, 2022. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/kontrol-za-deyatelnostyu-notariusa-v-rossiyskoy-federatsii-i-zarubezhnyh-stranah-sravnitelnyy-analiz
11. Korkmazova D.V. Otdel’nyye aspekty pravovoy reglamentatsii notarial’nogo udostovereniya sdelok v Rossii i za rubezhom [Аspects of the legal regulation of notarial certification of transactions in Russia and abroad]. Proceedings of the International Research and Practice Conference of the Young Researcher: Challenges and Prospects. Moscow, 2019, pp. 201–205.
12. Bobrovskiy A.A. K voprosu o vozmozhnosti nadeleniya notariusov mediativnymi polnomochiyami [To the question of the possibility of vesting notaries with mediative powers]. Bulletin of Science and Practice, 2018. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/k-voprosu-o-vozmozhnosti-nadeleniya-notariusov-mediativnymi-polnomochiyami
13. Seliverstov Ye.A. Zarubezhnyy opyt notarial’nogo udostovereniya sdelok [Foreign experience of notarial certification of transactions]. Herald of Science, 2020. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/zarubezhnyy-opyt-notarialnogo-udostovereniya-sdelok
14. Ral’ko V.V. Teoriya pravovoy deyatel’nosti notariata i organizatsii mezhnotarial’nykh sistem [Theory of legal activity of notaries and organization of inter-notarial systems]. Moscow, Yurist, 2014, pp. 120–122.
15. Karimova M.M. Razvitiye elektronnogo notariata v Respublike Uzbekistan [Development of electronic notaries in the Republic of Uzbekistan]. Proceedings of the European Science Forum: VIII International Scientific and Practical Conference, Petrozavodsk, 2021, December 20. Petrozavodsk, New Science International Center for Scientific Partnership, 2021, pp. 182–187.
