SOME COMMENTS ON THE PROCEDURAL LEGAL STATUS OF THE PERSONS INVOLVED IN THE CIVIL PROCEEDINGS
Keywords:
civil court, civil procedural law, civil process, participants in civil proceedings, participants in the trial, persons participating in the case, parties, third parties, prosecutor, representativeAbstract
The article analyzes the scientific and theoretical views of legal scholars on the theory of civil procedural legislation and the science of civil procedural law on the procedural and legal status of persons participating in a case in civil proceedings. In particular, such concepts as the types of subjects of civil procedural legal relations, participants in civil proceedings, participants in the trial, persons participating in the case have been scientifically and theoretically studied. The article separately considers the composition of the persons participating in the case, their procedural rights and obligations.
In particular, the concept and types of parties, their procedural and legal status, the concept and procedural and legal status of third parties and their types, the procedural and legal status of the prosecutor in civil proceedings, the theory of science of civil procedural law and problems of judicial practice, the concept of representation in court, a lawyer as a contractual representative, their procedural and legal status in the process and the scientific and theoretical views of civil procedural law and legal scholars are studied, as a result of which a comparative analysis of the civil procedural legislation of foreign countries is carried out and conceptual scientific and theoretical conclusions are put forward, proposals and recommendations for improving civil procedural legislation are developed.
References
1. Egamberdiyev E. Fuqarolik protsessual huquqiy munosabatlar [Civil procedural legal relations]. Tashkent, Аdolat publ., 2000, p. 64.
2. Mamasiddiqov M.M. Mehnatga oid yetkazilgan moddiy va maʼnaviy zararni sudda undirishning nazariy va amaliy muammolari [Theoretical and practical problems of recovery of labor-related material and moral damage in court]. Tashkent, АQHMI, 2008, p. 102.
3. Yakubov S.А. Storony v grazhdanskom protsesse [Parties in civil proceedings]. Tashkent, Konsauditinform-nashr Publ., 2015, p. 6.
4. Shoraxmetov Sh.Sh. O‘zbekiston Respublikasining fuqarolik protsessual huquqi [Civil procedural law of the Republic of Uzbekistan]. Tashkent, TSIL Publ., 2007, pp. 48–49.
5. Grazhdanskiy protsess [Civil process]. Ed. M.K. Treushnikov. Moscow, Jurisprudence, 2001, p. 37.
6. Alekhina S.A., Blazheev V.V. et al. Grazhdanskoye protsessualnoye pravo [Civil procedural law]. Ed. M.S. Shakarian. Moscow, TK Velbi, 2014, p. 46.
7. Fuqarolik protsessual huquqi [Civil procedural law]. The team of authors. Tashkent, TSUL Publ., 2020, p. 95.
8. Grazhdanskiy protsessualniy kodeks Respubliki Belarus [Civil Procedural Code of the Republic of Belarus]. Available at: https://kodeksy-by.com/grazhdanskij_protsessualnyj_kodeks_rb.htm
9. Vlasov А.А. Grazhdanskoye protsessualnoye pravo [Civil procedure law]. Moscow, 2004, 70 p.
10. Kommentariy k grazhdanskomu protsessualnomu kodeksu Rossiyskoy Federatsii (postateynyy, nauchno-prakticheskiy) [Commentary on the Civil Procedural Code of the Russian Federation (article by article, scientific and practical)]. Ed. M.A. Vikut. Moscow, 2017, pp. 100–101.
11. Аrtebyakina N.А. Teoreticheskiye i prakticheskiye problemy instituta lits, uchastvuyushhikh v dele [Theoretical and practical problems of the institute involved in the case]. Abstract of PhD thesis. Saratov, 2010, p. 3.
12. Tumanova L.V. Litsa, uchastvuyushhiye v dele v tselyakh zashhity publichno-pravovykh interesov [Persons involved in the case in purposes of protecting public law interests]. Tver, 2001, p. 88.
13. Mamasiddiqov M. Fuqarolik protsessi [Civil procedure]. Tashkent, Baktria press Publ., 2014, p. 62.
14. Popova Yu.А. Sudoproizvodstva po delam, voznikayushhim iz publichno-pravovykh otnosheniy (teoriticheskiye problemy) [Proceedings in cases arising from public law relations (theoretical problems)]. Krasnodar, 2002, 90 p.
15. Mamasiddiqov M.M. Fuqarolik protsessi ishtirokchilari tarkibini takomillashtirishning amaliy masalalari [Practical issues of improving the composition of civil process participants]. Bulletin of Legal Sciences, 2007, pp. 36–39.
16. Esanova Z.N. Fuqarolik protsessual huquqi [Civil procedural law]. Yuridik adabiyotlar Publ., 2022, p. 102.
17. Grazhdanskiy protsess [Civil process]. Rep. ed. V.V. Yarkov. Moscow, Volters Kluver Publ., 2004, p. 59.
18. Grazhdanskiy protsessualniy kodeks Respubliki Kazakhstan [Civil Procedural Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan]. Available at: http://www.frmp.kz/cgi-bin/index.cgi/61?pid=83&p=517
19. Shoraxmetov Sh.Sh. O‘zbekiston Respublikasining Fuqarolik protsessual kodeksiga sharhlar [Comments on the Civil Procedural Code of the Republic of Uzbekistan]. Tashkent, TSIL Publ., 2007, p. 113.
20. Grazhdanskiy protsess [Civil process]. Moscow, Yurlit Publ., 2015, p. 107.
21. Аrgunov V.N. Uchastiye prokurora v grazhdanskom protsesse [Participation of the prosecutor in civil proceedings]. Moscow, MSU, 1991, 114 p.
22. Vikut M.А., Zaytsev I.M. Grazhdanskiy protsess Rossii [Russian civil process]. 2012, p. 83.
23. Egamberdiyev E. Fuqarolik jarayoni huquqida daʼvo muammolari [Litigation issues in civil procedural law]. Doctor’s degree dissertation. Tashkent, 2007.
24. Sirik Yu.V. Praktika primineniya zakonodatelstva, reguliruyushhego uchastiye prokurora v grazhdanskom protsesse [The practice of applying legislation regulating the participation of the prosecutor in civil proceedings]. Legal Analytical Journal, 2004, p. 176.
25. Mamasiddiqov M., Karimov M. Fuqarolik protsessida prokuror ishtiroki [Prosecutor’s participation in civil proceedings]. Ed. S.S. Shorakhmetov. Tashkent, АQHMI, 2008, p. 32.
26. Egamberdiyev E.E. Grajdanlik protsessida prokurorning ishtiroki [Prosecutor’s participation in civil proceedings]. 1997, pp. 63–64.
27. Olimova K.K. Fuqarolik sud ishlarini yuritishda vakilning ishtirok etish muammolari [Problems of representative participation in civil court proceedings]. Abstract of PhD thesis. Tashkent, 2011, p. 30.
28. The speech of the President of the Republic of Uzbekistan Shavkat Mirziyoyev at the solemn ceremony dedicated to the 27th anniversary of the adoption of the Constitution of the Republic of Uzbekistan entitled “Constitution and the rule of law are the most important criteria of a legal democratic state and civil society”. Xalq so‘zi – Folk word, 2019.
29. Xabibullayev D.Yu. Аdvokatura institutini isloh qilish davr talabi [Reform of the Bar Institute is the need of the time]. O‘zbekiston Respublikasi Oliy sudining axborotnomasi – Bulletin of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Uzbekistan, 2020, p. 38.
30. Аltiyev R. Yangi qonun hujjati advokatura sohasini qanchalik o‘zgartiradi? [How much will the new law change the legal profession?]. 2020. Available at: http://hudud24.uz
