CIVIL LAW NATURE OF DIGITAL FINANCIAL ASSETS

Authors

Keywords:

digital financial assets, digital rights, objects of civil rights, uncertificated securities, crypto-assets, distributed ledger, tokenization, legal nature

Abstract

The subject of this study is the body of doctrinal and regulatory approaches to determining the civil-law nature of digital financial assets (DFAs) and their place within the system of objects of civil rights. The relevance of the study stems from the absence of a unified doctrinal approach to determining the place of DFAs within the system of objects of civil rights, as well as from differences in their regulatory treatment across individual jurisdictions. The aim of the study is to analyse existing scholarly concepts and legislative approaches to determining the legal nature of DFAs. The study conducts a comparative legal analysis of the regulation of digital financial assets in the Russian Federation, the Republic of Uzbekistan, and the People’s Republic of China. It also examines the principal doctrinal concepts under which digital financial assets are regarded as digital rights, a form of uncertificated securities, objects of absolute digital rights, or a technological form through which traditional property rights exist. The study concludes that there is a need for further development of the theoretical foundations governing the legal regime of DFAs and for the formulation of a more consistent approach to their legal classification.

References

Akinfieva, V. V. (2021). Tsifrovye finansovye aktivy kak novyy vid tsifrovykh prav [Digital financial assets as a new type of digital rights]. Ex jure, 1, 46–55. https://doi.org/10.17072/2619-0648-2021-1-46-55

California Digital Financial Assets Law, Cal. Fin. Code § 3101 et seq. (2023). https://law.justia.com/codes/california/code-fin/division-1-25/chapter-1/section-3102/

Efimova, L., Sizemova, O., & Chub, D. (2024). Digital financial assets: Concept and legal nature. BRICS Law Journal, 11(1), 32–57. https://doi.org/10.21684/2412-2343-2024-11-1-32-57

Goncharov, A. I., & Sadkov, V. A. (2023). Pravovaya priroda tsifrovykh finansovykh aktivov po zakonodatelstvu Rossiyskoy Federatsii [The legal nature of digital financial assets according to the legislation of the Russian Federation]. Legal Concept, 22(2), 82–90. https://doi.org/10.15688/lc.jvolsu.2023.2.11

National Agency of Perspective Projects of the Republic of Uzbekistan. (2022, November 28). On approval of the Regulation on the procedure for the issuance, registration of issue and circulation of crypto-assets by residents of the Republic of Uzbekistan (Order No. 3397). Lex.uz. https://lex.uz/docs/6299489

People’s Bank of China, Cyberspace Administration of China, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, State Administration for Industry and Commerce, China Banking Regulatory Commission, China Securities Regulatory Commission, & China Insurance Regulatory Commission. (2017, September 4). Announcement on preventing financial risks of token issuance.

Popondopulo, V. F., Petrov, D. A., & Silina, E. V. (2019). Problemy pravovoy zashchity ekonomicheskoy konkurentsii v usloviyakh tsifrovizatsii ekonomiki [Problems of legal protection of economic competition in the conditions of digitalization of the economy]. Competition Law, 3, 10–14.

President of the Republic of Uzbekistan. (2018, July 3). On measures for the development of the digital economy and the sphere of circulation of crypto-assets in the Republic of Uzbekistan (Resolution No. RP-3832). Lex.uz. https://lex.uz/ru/docs/3806048

Republic of Uzbekistan. (1996). Civil Code of the Republic of Uzbekistan. Lex.uz. https://lex.uz/docs/111181

Russian Federation. (1994). Civil Code of the Russian Federation. ConsultantPlus. https://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_5142/

Russian Federation. (2018, May 22). On digital financial assets (Draft Federal Law No. 419059-7). ConsultantPlus.

Russian Federation. (2020, July 31). On digital financial assets, digital currency and on amendments to certain legislative acts of the Russian Federation (Federal Law No. 259-FZ). ConsultantPlus. https://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_358753/

Sadkov, V. A. (2023). Tsifrovye finansovye aktivy kak obyekty grazhdanskikh prav [Digital financial assets as objects of civil rights]. Volgograd Academy of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia.

Sarnakov, I. (2019). Digital financial assets: Segments and prospects of legal regulation in the BRICS countries. BRICS Law Journal, 6(4), 95–113. https://doi.org/10.21684/2412-2343-2019-6-4-95-113

Sukhanov, E. A. (2021). O grazhdansko-pravovoy prirode “tsifrovogo imushchestva” [On the civil law nature of “digital property”]. Bulletin of Civil Law, 21(6), 7–29. https://doi.org/10.24031/1992-2043-2021-21-6-7-29

Zakharkina, A. V. (2022). Tsifrovye finansovye aktivy cherez prizmu ucheniya o bezdokumentarnykh tsennykh bumagakh [Digital financial assets through the prism of the doctrine of uncertificated securities]. Ex jure, 3, 55–69.

Downloads

Published

2026-08-28