НЕКОТОРЫЕ ВОПРОСЫ СОВЕРШЕНСТВОВАНИЯ МЕХАНИЗМА ПРЕДОСТАВЛЕНИЯ НАУЧНОЙ ИНФОРМАЦИИ В НОРМОТВОРЧЕСКОМ ПРОЦЕССЕ
Ключевые слова:
evidence-based lawmaking, научная информация, соискатели ученых степеней, научное заключение, нормотворчество, обеспечение нормотворческого процесса научной информацией, science-based lawmakingАннотация
В данной статье анализируются вопросы совершенствования механизма предоставления научной информации в нормотворческом процессе. Целью исследования является разработка актуальных предложений, рекомендаций и выводов по совершенствованию законодательства Республики Узбекистан и практики правоприменения. В этой связи исследованы вопросы предоставления научной информации в нормотворческом процессе, предметом исследования являются нормативно-правовые акты, касающиеся нормотворческого процесса в Республике Узбекистан, практика применения права, а также научно-теоретические концептуальные подходы и правовые категории. В исследовании применялись такие методы, как исторический, системно-структурный, логический, индукционный, дедуктивный, сравнительно-правовой, комплексного исследования научных источников и статистического анализа данных. В результате научного исследования разработаны авторское определение понятия «обеспечение нормотворческого процесса научной информацией», предлагается ввести в национальное законодательство понятие
evidence-based lawmaking, механизм прикрепления научных заключений экспертов или ученых к законопроектам, разработан обязательный механизм подачи предложений, разработанных соискателями ученых степеней, в целях создания национальной научно-технической базы Ilmiy axborot и механизма определения ежегодного рейтинга ученых и специалистов в этой сфере.
Библиографические ссылки
1. Axmedshayeva M.A. Davlat hokimiyati tizimida ijro hokimiyati [Executive power in the system of state power]. Doctor’s degree dissertation. 12.00.01. Tashkent, TSUL, 2010, 273 p.
2. Abdullayev Q.Q. O‘zbekistonda qonun ijodkorligini takomillashtirish muammolari [Problems of improving law-making in Uzbekistan]. Tashkent, TSUL, 2013, 55 p.
3. Berdiyarov Sh.N. Ikki palatali parlament sharoitida qonunchilik texnikasi [Legislative technique in the bicameral parliament]. Abstract of PhD thesis. 12.00.01. Tashkent, TSUL, 2009, 24 p.
4. Rustamov P.A. Nauchno-informatsionnoye obespecheniye zakonotvorcheskoy deyatel’nosti v Respublike Uzbekistan [Scientific and information support of legislative activity in the Republic of Uzbekistan]. Tashkent, 2001, 149 p.
5. Tulteyev I.T. Pravotvorcheskaya deyatel’nost’ i prognozirovaniye [Lawmaking and Forecasting]. Tashkent, Academy of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Republic of Uzbekistan , 2008, 178 p.
6. Shodiqulov O.Z. Yuridik texnika va qonunlar sifatini oshirish muammolari [Problems of improving the quality of legal techniques and laws]. Abstract of PhD thesis. 12.00.01. Tashkent, TSUL, 2011, 24 p.
7. Hayitov X.S. Qonun ijodkorligida ekspertiza o‘tkazishning tashkiliy-huquqiy asoslarini takomillashtirish [Improving the organizational and legal basis of expertise in law-making]. Tashkent, Academy of Public Administration under the President of the Republic of Uzbekistan, 2018, 298 p.
8. Saydullayev Sh.A. Voprosy sovershenstvovaniya nauchno-teoreticheskikh i metodologicheskich osnov normotvorcheskoy deyatel’nosti v Respublike Uzbekistan na fone zarubezhnogo opyta [Issues of improving the scientific, theoretical and methodological foundations of rule-making activities in the Republic of Uzbekistan and the background of foreign experience]. Tashkent, Studia Politologizm, 2019, no. 52, pp. 132–148.
9. Choi B., Gupta A., Ward B. Good thinking: six ways to bridge the gap between scientists and policy makers. Journal of epidemiology and community health, 2009, no. 63 (3). pp. 179–180.
10. The official telegram channel of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Republic of Uzbekistan. Available at: https://t.me/ssvuz/11743/.
11. The official web page of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Republic of Uzbekistan. Available at: https://www.minzdrav.uz/uz/about/detail.php?ID=62457/.
12. Official webpage of the World Health Organization. Available at: https://www.who.int/news/item/15-10-2020-solidarity-therapeutics-trial-produces-conclusive-evidence-on-the-effectiveness-of-repurposed-drugs-for-covid-19-in-record-time/.
13. Mamasiddiqov M. Yuridik sohada ilmiy kadrlarni tayyorlash holati va tahlili [Status and analysis of the training of scientific personnel in the legal sphere]. Huquq va burch – Right and Duty, 2020, no. 8, pp. 8–18.
14. The official website of the Higher Attestation Commission under the Cabinet of Ministers of the Republic of Uzbekistan. Available at: http://oak.uz/pages/69/.
15. Ferraro F., Zambon A. Ekins’s moral assumptions and their impact on the analysis of legislation. American Jurnal of Jurisprudence, 2019, vol. 64, no. 1, pp. 19–40.
16. Smith K. Beyond Evidence-based policy in public health: the interplay of ideas. Hampshire, UK, Palgrave Macmillan, 2013, 251 p.
17. Kammerhofer J. Law-making by scholarship? The dark side of 21st century international legal ‘methodology’. The European Society of International Law, 2012, vol. 3, pp. 115–126.
18. The official webpage of Sciencedirect project. Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/.
19. The official webpage of Scopus. Available at: https://www.scopus.com/.
20. The official webpage of Tubitak. Available at: https://www.tubitak.gov.tr/.
21. The official webpage of Scimago Ranking. Available at: https://www.scimagojr.com/.
22. The official webpage of Elibrary project. Available at: https://www.elibrary.ru/.
23. Hamann H. Methoden empirischer forschung und ihr erkenntniswert für das Recht am Beispiel des gesellschaftsrechts. Evidenzbasierte Jurisprudenz – Evidence-based Jurisprudence, 2014, no. 21, 393 p.
24. Xo‘janazarov A.A. Adliya organlarining norma ijodkorligi faoliyatini takomillashtirish [Improvement of rule-making activities of justice bodies]. Tashkent, TSUL, 2021, 143 p.
25. Antokolskaia M. Van politiek gestuurde wetgeving naar evidence-based wetgeving. Den Haag, Boom Juridische uitgevers, 2013, no. 7, pp. 173–207.
26. Byrne D. Applying social science: The role of social research in politics, policy and practice. Bristol, Policy Press, 2011, pp. 99–119.
27. Berman M. Communicating tobacco product information to the public. Food and Drug Law Journal, 2017, vol. 72, no. 3, pp . 386–405.
28. Thompson L. Making British law. Committees in action. University of Surrey, UK, Palgrave Macmillan, 2015, 161 p.
29. Maddox B. How to engage with policy makers. A guide for academics in the arts and humanities. The Institute for Government (London), 2020, 26 p.
30. Delvenne P., Fallon C., Brunet S. Parliamentary technology assessment institutions as indications of reflexive modernization. Technology in Society, 2011, no. 33, 36 p.
31. Shapiro S.A. Law, expertise and rulemaking legitimacy: revisiting the reformation. Environmental Law, Lewis & Clark Law School, 2019, vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 661–682.
32. Summary of White House Office of Management Budget M-21-27: Evidence-Based Policymaking. Washington, 2021, 4 p.
33. Organizatsiya zakonoproektnoy raboty v sisteme federal’nykh organov ispolnitel’noy vlasti [Organization of legislative work in the system of federal executive bodies]. Ed. T.Ya. Khabriyeva. Moscow, Yurist Publ., 2006, p. 97.
34. Official webpage of the Australian Treasury and Economic Development Directorate. Available at: https://www.cmtedd.act.gov.au/communication/scientistofyear/.
35. Official webpage of the British Government. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/people/patrick-vallance/.
36. How European scientists will spend €100 billion. Available at: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-019-01566-z/.
37. Ashley D.L., Backinger C.L., Bemmel D.M., Neveleff D.J. Tobacco regulatory science: research to inform regulatory action at the Food and Drug Administration’s Center for Tobacco Products. Nicotine Tob Res., 2014, no. 16 (8), pp. 1045–1049.
38. Official web page of Food and Drug Administration. Available at: https://www.usa.gov/federal-agencies/food-and-drug-administration/.
39. Printz C. TCORS set to support the FDA’s regulatory role: program designed to generate tobacco-related research to inform policy. Cancer Scope, 2014, pp. 771–772.
40. Kim A.E. Influence of point-of-sale tobacco displays and graphic health warning signs on adults: evidence from a virtual store experimental study. American Journal of Public Health, 2014, no. 104 (5), pp. 888–895.
