THE SOCIAL NEED TO ENSURE THE SAFETY OF PARTICIPANTS IN THE CRIMINAL PROCESS
Keywords:
witness, victim, state protection, security, participants in criminal proceedingsAbstract
This article examines and thoroughly analyzes the need to ensure the safety of the victim, witnesses, expert, interpreter and other persons who are considered participants in the criminal process, as well as the current problems that arise. Taking into account the need for scientific (doctrinal) substantiation of the problem of personal security in criminal proceedings and the need for an adequate collection of the quantitative part of scientific research, in addition to the accepted legal documents, the person assisting the criminal process, as well as other participants in modern criminal justice, a number of opinions and comments were made on the problem of effective application of procedural security measures in investigative and judicial practice. In addition, the author considers the criminal procedural security of the participants in the process as a legal phenomenon that has a multilateral, contradictory, intersectoral and interdisciplinary character. It also concludes that the implementation of investigative and procedural actions, the principles enshrined in the Code of Criminal Procedure, the development of legal remedies and the use of a system of legal, organizational and other means of protection against external and internal illegal influences are aimed at applying the rules to achieve the goal of the process at the stage of law enforcement.
References
1. Babkina Ye.V. Obespecheniye bezopasnosti svideteley pri proizvodstve predvaritelnogo rassledovaniya po UVPK RF [Ensuring the safety of witnesses during the production of a preliminary investigation according to the UVPK of the Russian Federation]. PhD thesis. Vladimir, 2009, p. 18.
2. Bobrakov I.A. Okhrana uchastnikov ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva: kriminologicheskiye i ugolovno-pravovyye aspekty [Protection of participants in criminal proceedings: criminological and criminal law aspects]. Zakon i pravo – Law and Law, Moscow, YUNITI-DANA Publ., 2005, p. 64.
3. Tulaganova G.Z., Matmurotov A.R., Mavlanov K.T. Jinoyat protsessida shaxs xavfsizligini taʼminlash [Ensuring personal safety during criminal proceedings]. Tashkent, TSUL Publ., 2016,
pp. 12–35.
4. Yepikhin A.Yu. Gosudarstvennaya zashhita sub”yektov ugolovnogo protsessa [State protection of the subjects of the criminal process]. Bulletin of Scientific Works of the Nizhnekamsk branch of the Moscow Humanitarian and Economic Institute. Ser. 4: Fighting Crime, Nizhnekamsk, Nizhnekamsk branch of MHEI, 2002.
5. Brusnitsyn L.V. Pravovoye obespecheniye bezopasnosti lits, sodeystvuyushikh ugolovnomu pravosudiyu: vremennoy i sub''yektivnyy aspekty [Legal security of foxes, facilitating criminal law: temporal and subjective aspects]. State and Law, 1996, no. 9, p. 82.
6. Brusnitsyn L.V. Teoretiko-pravovyye osnovy i mirovoy opyt obespecheniya bezopasnosti lits, sodeystvuyushhikh ugolovnomu pravosudiyu [Theoretical and legal foundations and world experience in ensuring human security, contributing to criminal justice]. Doctor’s degree dissertation. Moscow, 2002.
7. Yepikhin A.Yu. Kontseptsiya obespecheniya bezopasnosti lichnosti v sfere ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva [The concept of ensuring the security of the individual in the field of criminal justice]. Doctor’s degree dissertation. Syktyvkar, 2004.
8. Brusnitsyn L.V. Obespecheniye bezopasnosti lits sodeystvuyushhikh ugolovnomu pravosudiyu: rossiyskiy, zarubezhnyy i mezhdunarodnyy opyt XX veka (protsessualnoye issledovaniye) [Ensuring the safety of foxes to promote criminal justice: Russian, foreign and international experience of the twentieth century (procedural study)]. Moscow, Yurlitinform Publ., 2001,
pp. 102–110.
9. Yepikhin A.Yu. Institut bezopasnosti uchastnikov ugolovnogo protsessa: sravnitelnyy analiz zakonodatelstva zarubezhnykh stran [Institute for the Safety of Participants in the Coal Process: Comparative Analysis of the Legislation of Foreign Countries]. Actual Problems of Economics and Law, 2008, no. 1 (5), pp. 139–145.
10. Tomilova N.S. Printsipy gosudarstvennoy zashhity poterpevshikh i svideteley: aktualnost i problemy [Principy gosudarstvennoy protection poterpevshix i svideteley: aktualnost i problems]. Business Security, 2008, no. 3.
11. Tomilova N.S. Printsipy gosudarstvennoy zashhity poterpevshikh, svideteley i inykh uchastnikov ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva [Principles of state protection of survivors, witnesses and participants in criminal proceedings]. PhD thesis. Moscow, 2009, p. 4.
12. Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and the Fundamentals of Freedom: concluded in Rome. 1950.
13. Biryukov M.M. Yevropeyskoye pravo: do i posle Lissabonskogo dogovora [European Law: Before and After the Treaty of Lisbon]. Moscow, 2013.
14. Kudryavsev V.N. Strategiya borby s prestupnostyu [Strategy borby s prestupnostyu]. Moscow, 2003, p. 308.
15. Yepikhin A.Yu., Mishin A.V. Obespecheniye bezopasnosti lits, sodeystvuyushhikh ugolovnomu sudoproizvodstvu [Ensuring the safety of foxes, facilitate the fixing of criminal proceedings]. Kazan. 2018, p. 24.
16. Zaysev O.A. Konsepsiya gosudarstvennoy zashhity uchastnikov ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva v Rossiyskoy Federatsii [Concept of state protection of participants in criminal proceedings in the Russian Federation]. Bulletin of the Orenburg State University, 2006, no. 6,
pp. 77–81.
17. Yepikhin A.Yu. K voprosu o bezopasnosti zashhishhayemykh lits v ugolovnom protsesse [On the issue of the safety of protected foxes in criminal proceedings]. Russian Investigator, 2002, no. 2, p. 14.
18. Brusnitsyn L.V. Obespecheniye bezopasnosti uchastnikov protsessa: vozmozhnosti i perspektivy razvitiya UPK [Ensuring the safety of participants in the process: opportunities and prospects for the development of the Code of Criminal Procedure]. Russian Justice. 2003, no. 5.
