НЕКОТОРЫЕ ТЕОРЕТИЧЕСКИЕ И ПРАКТИЧЕСКИЕ ВОПРОСЫ СОВЕРШЕНСТВОВАНИЯ ИНСТИТУТА МИРОВОГО СОГЛАШЕНИЯ В АДМИНИСТРАТИВНОМ СУДОПРОИЗВОДСТВЕ
Ключевые слова:
мировое соглашение, соглашение, посредничество, медиация, соглашение сторон, изменение и расторжение мирового соглашения, принцип конфиденциальности мирового соглашения.Аннотация
В данной статье анализируется институт мирового соглашения, введенный главой 151 Кодекса Республики Узбекистан об административном судопроизводстве на основе Закона Республики Узбекистан «О внесении изменений и дополнений в некоторые законодательные акты Республики Узбекистан в связи с принятием дополнительных мер по обеспечению эффективной защиты прав граждан и субъектов предпринимательства во взаимоотношениях с государственными органами» от 26 апреля 2023 года № ЗРУ–833. В частности, был проведен анализ применения норм, касающихся заключения мирового соглашения между сторонами, включенных в Кодекс Республики Узбекистан об административном судопроизводстве, и в судебной практике таких иностранных государств, как Германия, Франция и Россия. Кроме того, была исследована структура соглашения с участием медиаторов, а именно – понятие института медиации, его использование и специфика в законодательстве различных государств. Изучив особенности понятия института мирового соглашения, данного в главе 151 Кодекса Республики Узбекистан об административном судопроизводстве, и сравнив их с понятиям мирового соглашения в Законе об административных судах Германии, сформулированы предложения с учетом нашего национального законодательства. В процессе исследования, исходя из опыта зарубежных стран, связанного с медиацией и заключением мировых соглашений, были выдвинуты предложения о внесении изменений в статью 3 Кодекса Республики Узбекистан об административном судопроизводстве и дополнении его двумя новыми статьями.
Библиографические ссылки
1. Israilova Z.S. Oʻzbekistonda mahalliy davlat hokimiyati vakillik organlari faoliyatining samaradorligini baholash mexanizmini takomillashtirish [Improving the mechanism for evaluating the effectiveness of the representative bodies of local state power in Uzbekistan]. PhD thesis. Tashkent, 2020, 54 p.
2. Kaynov V.I., Zareskaya E.V. Aktual'nyye problemy byudzhetnogo protsessa v Rossiyskoy Federatsii: administrativno-pravovoy aspekt [Actual problems of the budget process in the Russian Federation: administrative and legal aspect]. St. Petersburg, KultInformPress Publ., 2019, 83 p.
3. Ilin A.V. Optimizatsiya pravotvorcheskoy deyatel'nosti v sovremennoy Rossii (voprosy teorii i praktiki) [Optimizing engineering research in modern Russia (questions of theory and practice)]. St. Petersburg, 2010, 309 p.
4. Rustamov P.A. Nauchno-informatsionnoye obespecheniye zakonodatel'noy deyatel'nosti v Respublike Uzbekistan [Scientific and information support of law-making activity in the Republic of Uzbekistan]. PhD thesis. TSIL, 2001, 149 p.
5. Skurko Ye.V. Informatsionno-pravovoye obespecheniye zakonodatel'noy deyatel'nosti v Rossiyskoy Federatsii [Information and Legal Support of Law-making Activities in the Russian Federation]. PhD thesis. Moscow, 2003, 131 p.
6. The official web page of the UK government. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/news/red-tape-challenge
7. Busch Ch., Dannemann G., Schulte-Nölke H., Wiewiórowska-Domagalska A. Discussion draft of a directive on online intermediary platforms. Journal of European Consumer and Market Law, 2016, no. 5, pp. 164–169.
8. Sodikov A. Norm-making based on evidence and science is one of the main factors of development. Review of Law Sciences, 2020, no. 4, pp. 1–5.
9. Siyosatnoma (Siyar ul-muluk). Transl. from Persian, author of the foreword and comments Sh. Vahid, A. Erkinov. Tashkent, New age generation Publ., 2008, 239 p.
10. Mabillard V., Pasquie M., Sofia A. The use and effects of access to information laws.
A study in 14 countries. Working Paper de lʻIDHEAP, 2019, no. 6, 55 p.
11. Goetz K.H., Meyer-Sahling J.H. Political time in the EU: Dimensions, perspectives, theories. Journal of European Public Policy, 2009, no. 16 (2), pp. 180–201.
12. Artikov D.R. Idoraviy normativ-huquqiy jihatlari hujjatni haqiqiy emas deb topish toʻgʻrisidagi ishlarni sudda koʻrishning ma’muriy-huquqiy [Administrative-legal aspects of court hearing of cases regarding invalidity of a departmental normative legal acts]. PhD thesis. Tashkent, TSUL, 2021, 50 p.
13. Ne’matov J.N. Oʻzbekiston Respublikasida maʻmuriy tartib-taomillarning huquqiy asoslarini takomillashtirish (qiyosiy-huquqiy tahlil) [Improving the legal basis of administrative procedures in the Republic of Uzbekistan (comparative legal analysis)]. Doctor’s degree dissertation. Tashkent, 2019, 62 p.
14. Otaxonov F.X. Oʻzbekiston Respublikasida yuridik xizmatning nazariy-huquqiy muammolari [Theoretical and legal problems of legal service in the Republic of Uzbekistan]. Doctor’s degree dissertation. Tashkent, 2019, 47 p.
15. Zulfiqorov Sh.X. Oliy Majlis Qonunchilik palatasi deputati faoliyatining tashkiliy-huquqiy asoslari [Organizational and legal basis of activity of the deputy of the Legislative Chamber of the Oliy Majlis]. PhD thesis. Tashkent, TSIL, 2008, 26 p.
16. Hayitov X.S. Qonun ijodkorligi ekspertlik ta’minoti: milliy va xorijiy tajriba [Expert provision of law-making: national and foreign experience]. Yuridik fanlar axborotnomasi – Review of Legal Sciences, TSUL, 2018, no. 2, pp. 14–19.
17. Berdiyarov Sh.N. Ikki palatali parlament sharoitida qonunchilik texnikasi [Legal writing in the conditions of the bicameral parliament]. PhD thesis. Tashkent, TSIL, 2009, 24 p.
18. Alimov B., Mahkamov O. Boshqaruv kadrlarini oʻqitishning huquqiy asoslari va ta’lim jarayonini takomillashtirish istiqbollari [Legal basis of training management personnel and prospects for improvement of the educational process]. Society and Management, 2020, no. 2 (88), pp. 112–117.
19. Mahkamov O., Rahmonov Q. Oʻzbekistonda boshqaruv kadrlarini tayyorlash, qayta tayyorlash va malakasini oshirishda masofaviy ta’limni takomillashtirish masalalari [Issues of improving distance education in the training, retraining and upgrading of managerial personnel in Uzbekistan]. Society and Management, 2019, no. 3 (85), pp. 125–132.
20. Pasquale F. Data-informed duties in ai development. Columbia Law Review, 2019,
vol. 119, no. 7, pp. 1917–1940.
21. Trofimova T.V., Lomovtseva A.V. Tsifrovyye tekhnologii v obespechenii deyatel’nosti organov gosudarstvennoy vlasti [Digital technologies in ensuring the activities of public authorities]. Creative Economy, 2019, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 261–270.
22. Report on strengthening forensic in the United States: A path forward. National Academy of Science, 2009, no. 228091, 350 p.
23. Henderson C., Botluk D. Sleuthing scientific evidence information on the Internet.
The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 2016, vol, 106, no. 1, p. 61.
24. Siefken S.T., Schüttemeyer S.S. The German Bundestag and external expertise: Policy orientation as counterweight to deparliamentarisation? International library of policy analysis. Policy Analysis in Germany Bristol: Policy Press, 2013, pp. 161–180.
25. Hoshimxonov A.M. Oʻzbekiston Respublikasi Vazirlar Mahkamasining huquq ijodkorlik faoliyati: nazariya va amaliyot masalalari [Law-making activities of the Cabinet of Ministers of the Republic of Uzbekistan: theory and practical issues]. PhD thesis. Tashkent, TSIL, 2008, 26 p.
26. Turdiyev X.U. Ijro hokimiyatining huquq ijodkorlik faoliyati bilan bogʻliq munosabatlarni takomillashtirish masalalari [Issues of improving the relations of the executive power in connection with the law-making activity]. Analysis of the Legislation
of Uzbekistan, TSUL, 2019, no. 1, р. 26.
27. Sultanova S.A. Teoretiko-pravovyye voprosy primeneniya modeli «Umnoye regulirovaniye» v normotvorchestve [Theoretical and legal issues of the application of the “Smart regulation” model in rule-making]. PhD thesis. Tashkent, TSUL, 2021, 184 p.
28. Xoʻjanazarov A.A. Adliya organlarining norma ijodkorligi faoliyatini takomillashtirish [Improving the rule-making activity of judicial bodies]. PhD thesis. Tashkent, TSUL, 2021, 143 p.
29. Administrative Procedure Act (Verwaltungsverfahrensgesetz, VwVfG). Federal Law Gazette, 2008, no. 1, 2418 p.
30. Ministerial Code. Cabinet Office. London, 2019, no. 1.3. (a), 36 p.
31. Xolov A. Davlat xizmatchilari faoliyati samaradorligini baholash [Evaluation of the performance of civil servants]. Society and Management, 2019, no. 3 (85), pp. 84–90.
32. Kodirova Sh. Otsenka effektivnosti deyatel’nosti gosudarstvennykh sluzhashhikh: sovremennoye sostoyaniye i perspektivy razvitiya [Evaluation of the performance of civil servants: current state and development prospects]. Society and Management, 2019, no. 3 (85), pp. 74-83.
33. The official webpage of GovTrack NGO. Available at: https://www.govtrack.us/about
34. The official webpage of The American Presidency Project. Available at: https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/statistics/data/executive-orders
35. Bucchianeri P., Volden C., Wiseman A.E. Legislative Effectiveness in the American States. Center for Effective Lawmaking Working Paper, 2020, 52 p.
36. Heald P.J., Sichelman T.M. Ranking the academic impact of 100 american law schools. University of Illinois College of Law Legal Studies Research, 2019, no. 20-433, pp. 11–20.
