CONCEPT OF SEARCH AND PROCEDURAL GUARANTEES OF INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS AND LEGAL INTERESTS DURING SEARCH
Keywords:
search, seizure, investigator, parties, search reportAbstract
In this article, the concept of search, which is considered an investigative action in the criminal process, and the issues of procedural guarantees of individual rights and legal interests during the search are analyzed in detail. In this regard, the norms defined in the criminal-procedural legislation on the concept of search and the views of experts and scientists in this regard were studied, and the definition of this concept was developed by the author. In turn, the different aspects from the concept of seizure investigative action are revealed. In criminal procedural legislation, the investigator is given broad powers to independently resolve issues related to the rights, freedoms, and interests of the individual during the search. This article analyzes the conditions that the investigator and participants must follow during the search. Since the search process is directly related to the right of individuals to privacy of residence, the article researches the national and international legislation on guaranteeing the right to privacy of residence in the implementation of this investigative action. Also, based on this scientific research, reasonable conclusions were made regarding the specific aspects of conducting a search in different places, including issues related to the rights and guarantees of diplomatic missions and their employees who have diplomatic immunity when a search is conducted in the territory of a diplomatic mission.
References
1. Abdumazhidov G. Problemy sovershenstvovaniya predvaritel’nogo rassledovaniya [Problems of improving the preliminary investigation]. Tashkent, Science Publ., 1975, p. 16.
2. Mukhitdinov R.A. O‘zbekiston yuridik ensiklopediyasi [Legal encyclopedia of Uzbekistan]. Ed.
N. Toychiyev. Tashkent, Adolat Publ., 2010, pp. 347–348.
3. Kommentariy k Ugolovno-protsessual’nomu kodeksu Rossiyskoy Federatsii [Commentary on the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation]. Ed. V.V. Mozyakov. Moscow, 2002, p. 259.
4. Belkin R.S. Kriminalistika [Forensics]. Concise encyclopedia. Moscow, Bolshaya Russkaya Entsyklopediya Publ., 1993, p. 47.
5. Ratinov A.R. Obysk i vyemka [Search and seizure]. Moscow, 1961, p. 7.
6. Moskolkova Yu.A. Okhrana prav i zakonnkh interesov lichnosti [Protection of the rights and legitimate interests of the individual]. Yaroslavl, 1984, p. 58.
7. Kriminalistika [Criminology]. Ed. V.A. Obraztsov. Moscow, Yurist Publ., 1995, p. 331.
8. Kriminalistika [Criminology]. Eds. A.G. Fillipova, A.F. Volinsky. Moscow, Spark Publ., 1998, p. 269.
9. Shodiyev G‘. Tintuv o‘tkazishda shaxs huquq va qonuniy manfaatlarining protsessual kafolatlari [Procedural guarantees of a person’s rights and legal interests during a search]. TDYI Axborotnomasi – TSIL Bulletin, 2009, no. 3, pp. 120–121.
10. Shodiyev G‘. Sudgacha ish yuritish bosqichida sud nazorati tushunchasi va mazmuni [The concept and content of judicial control at the stage of pre-trial proceedings]. TDYI Axborotnomasi – TSIL Bulletin, 2009, no. 1.
11. Inson huquqlari bo‘yicha xalqaro shartnomalar [International agreements on human rights]. Tashkent, 2004, p. 33.
13. Peshkov M.A. Arest i obysk v ugolovnom protsesse SShA [Arrest and search in USA criminal proceedings]. Moscow, 1998, p. 100.
14. Ugolovniy protsess [Criminal procedure]. Ed. V.P. Bozheva. Moscow, 1998, p. 295.
15. Gridchin A.A. Obespecheniye dopustimosti dokazatel’stv na predvaritel’nom sledstvii [Ensuring the admissibility of evidence during the preliminary investigation]. Abstract of PhD thesis. Moscow, 1999, p. 14.
16. Shurukhnov N.G. Aktual’nyye problemy sovershenstvovaniya deyatel’nosti organov vnutrennikh del v novykh ekonomicheskikh i sotsial’nykh usloviyakh [Current problems of improving the activities of internal affairs bodies in new economic and social conditions]. Moscow, 1997, p. 207.
17. Ryzhakov A.P. Sledstvennyye deystviya [Investigative actions]. Moscow, 1997, p. 38.
