YURIDIK SHАXSGА NISBАTАN QO‘LLАNADIGАN HUQUQNI INKORPORАTSIYA MEZONI BO‘YICHА АNIQLАSH MUАMMOLАRI
Kalit so‘zlar:
shaxsiy qonun, millat, inkorporatsiya, xalqaro xususiy huquq, fuqarolik huquqi, investitsiyaAnnotatsiya
Mazkur maqolada xalqaro xususiy huquqiy munosabatlarda yuridik shaxsga nisbatan qo‘llanadigan qonunni aniqlash bo‘yicha inkorporatsiya nazariyasining ahamiyati, uning doktrina va qonunchilikda qo‘llanishi, xalqaro shartnomalarda aks etganligi hamda amaliyotda tutgan o‘rni tadqiq qilingan. Bundan tashqari, inkorporatsiya mezoni qo‘llanadigan xorijiy davlatlar qonunchiligi guruhlarga bo‘lib tasniflangan hamda inkorporatsiya mezonining boshqa mezonlar bilan birga qo‘llanishi mumkinligi o‘z tasdig‘ini topgan. Shuningdek, inkorporatsiya mezoni yuridik shaxs shaxsiy qonunini aniqlashga nisbatan ham, yuridik shaxs millatini aniqlashga nisbatan ham qo‘llanishi isbotlandi. Аyni paytda inkorporatsiya mezonining afzalliklari bilan bir qatorda kamchiliklari ham mavjudligi uchun faqat o‘zini yagona mezon sifatida qo‘llash maqsadga muvofiq emas. Maqolani yozish davomida tarixiylik, qiyosiylik, izchillik kabi metodlardan foydalanildi.
Iqtiboslar
1. Oxford Learner’s Dictionaries. Available at: https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/definition/english/incorporation?q=incorporation/.
2. Ebeiimth C.T. Konzernleistungs- und KonzembildungskontroUe - Ein Beitrag Kompetenzen von Vorstand und Hauptversammlung [Group Performance and ConCeption ControUe - A Contribution Competencies of the Board of Management and the Annual General Meeting]. Constance, 1987, p. 71.
3. Аnufriyeva L.P., Bekyashev K.А., Dmitriyeva G.K. Mezhdunarodnoye chastnoye pravo [Private International Law]. Ed. G.K. Dmitriyeva. Moscow, 2003, 688 p.
4. Aukhatov A.Ya. Opredeleniye primenimogo k yuridicheskim litsam prava (Sravnitel’nyy analiz prava RF, FRG i ES) [Determination of the law applicable to legal entities (Comparative analysis of the law of the Russian Federation, Germany and the EU)]. PhD thesis. Kazan, 2005, 227 p.
5. Federal Act on Private International Law. Available at: https://www.fedlex.admin.ch/eli/cc/1988/1776_1776_1776/en#art_154/.6.
6. Law of the Republic of Macedonia on Private International Law. Available at: https://www.hse.ru/data/2015/10/22/1079348831/.
7. Bulgarian Private International Law Code. Available at: https://pravo.hse.ru/intprilaw/doc/041701/.
8. Bur’yanov V.V. Lichnyy zakon yuridicheskogo litsa v possiyskom zakonodatel’stve [Personal Law of a Legal Entity in Russian Law]. Journal of Russian Law, 2004, no. 5. Reference legal system Garant-Maximum with regional legislation. Version dated 2005, March 26.
9. Kruse V. Sitzverlegung von Kapitalgesellschaften innerhalb der EG: Vereinbarkeit der einschlagigen Regelungen des deutscheix Sacli- und Kollisionsrechts mit dem EG-Vertrag [Transfer of the registered office of corporations within the EC: Compatibility of the relevant provisions of the German conflict of laws with the EC Treaty]. Koln, Berlin, Bonn, Munich, 1997, 286 p.
10. Gorodetskiy L.M. Opredeleniye natsional’nosti yuridicheskikh lits v mezhdunarodnom chastnom prave [Determination of the Nationality of Legal Entities in Private International Law]. Soviet Yearbook of International Law, 1983. Moscow, Nauka, 1984.
11. Kadysheva O.V. Natsional’nost’ yuridicheskikh lits v mezhdunarodnom chastnom prave [Nationality of legal entities in private international law]. PhD thesis. Moscow, 2002, 168 p.
12. Brun M.I. Yuridicheskiye litsa v mezhdunarodnom chastnom prave [Legal Entities in Private International Law]. Book 1: On the personal status of a legal entity. St. Petersburg, 1915, 615 p.
13. Azaino E.U. Nationality/Treaty Shopping: Can Host Countries Sift the Wheat from the Chaff? Cepmlp Annual Review (CAR), 2012, January 31.
14. Yusifova R.T. Nekotoryye problemnyye aspekty transgranichnoy deyatel’nosti yuridicheskikh lits [Some problematic aspects of cross-border activities of legal entities]. Actual Problems of Russian Law, 2016, no. 5 (66), pp. 162–168.
15. Staudinger J., Grobfeld B. International corporate law. 13th ed. 1993.
16. Aristova E.A. Institut otvetstvennosti transgranichnykh korporativnykh grupp v mezhdunarodnom chastnom prave [Institute of Responsibility of Cross-border Corporate Groups in Private International Law]. Abstract of PhD thesis. Moscow, 2013, 209 p.
17. Schreuer Ch.H. The ICSID Convention: A Commentary: A Commentary on the Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes Between States and nationals of Other States. Cambridge University Press, 2001, p. 281.
18. Barcelona Traction, Light and Power Co. Ltd. (Belgium v. Spain). 1970, I.C.J., Reports 3.
19. Lee L.J. Barcelona Traction in the 21st century: Revisiting its customary and policy underpinnings 35 years later. Stanford Journal of International Law, Westlaw, 2006, Summer, p. 237.
20. Elettronica Sicula SpA (ELSI), United States of America v. Italy. Available at: https://www.icj-cij.org/en/case/76/.
21. Resolution of the UN General Assembly A/RES/62/67 of 06.12.2007 with the annex of the Draft Articles “Diplomatic Protection”. Available at: https://documents-dds ny.un.org/ doc/UNDOC/GEN/N07/467/81/PDF/N0746781.pdf?OpenElement/.
