BIG DATA SOHASIDA SUNʼIY INTELLEKTNING HUQUQ VA MAJBURIYATLARI: MUAMMOLAR HAMDA YECHIMLAR
Kalit so‘zlar:
sunʼiy intellekt, Big Data, huquqiy tartibga solish, axloq, javobgarlik, shaffoflik, kamsitmaslik, shaxsiy maʼlumotlarAnnotatsiya
Ushbu maqola Big Data sohasida maʼlumotlarni qayta ishlash va tahlil qilish jarayonida sunʼiy intellektning (SI) huquq hamda majburiyatlarini tartibga solishdagi muammolar, potensial yechimlarni muhokama qilishga bagʻishlangan. Tadqiqot kompleks metodologiyani qoʻllagan holda Big Data sohasida sunʼiy intellektning huquq va majburiyatlarini tartibga solishning huquqiy hamda axloqiy jihatlarini oʻrganadi. Maqolada SIni qoʻllashda javobgarlik, shaffoflik, kamsitmaslik va shaxsiy maʼlumotlarni himoya qilishning huquqiy, axloqiy jihatlari koʻrib chiqiladi. Mavjud huquqiy asoslar oʻrganiladi va ularni takomillashtirish boʻyicha zarur choralar taklif etiladi, jumladan, maxsus qonunchilikni ishlab chiqish, mustaqil audit mexanizmlarini yaratish, shaffoflik va hisobdorlikka oid talablarni belgilash, shuningdek, xalqaro hamkorlikni rivojlantirish kabilar qayd etiladi. SIni tartibga solishda shaffoflik va hisobdorlik prinsiplarining roliga alohida eʼtibor qaratiladi. Shuningdek, tartibga solishning huquqiy va axloqiy jihatlarini yanada rivojlantirish uchun takliflar beriladi. Xususan, SI tizimlarini ishlab chiquvchilar, operatorlarining burch va masʼuliyatlarini belgilovchi maxsus standartlarni joriy etish hamda SI tizimlarini mustaqil ekspertizadan oʻtkazish va audit qilish mexanizmlarini yaratish shular jumlasidan. Tadqiqotda raqamli davrda innovatsion texnologiyalarni rivojlantirish va inson huquqlarini himoya qilishni taʼminlaydigan samarali, muvozanatli tartibga solish tizimini yaratish zarurligi toʻgʻrisida xulosalar qilinadi.
Iqtiboslar
1. Barfield W., Pagallo U. Research Handbook on the Law of Artificial Intelligence. Edward Elgar Publ., 2018, 640 p.
2. Coeckelbergh M. AI Ethics. MIT Press Publ., 2020, 256 p.
3. Ethically Aligned Design: A Vision for Prioritizing Human Well-being with Autonomous and Intelligent Systems. V. 2. IEEE Global Initiative on Ethics of Autonomous and Intelligent Systems, 2017, 138 p.
4. Floridi L. The Fourth Revolution: How the Infosphere is Reshaping Human Reality. Oxford University Press Publ., 2014, 272 p.
5. Comparative Analysis of National Strategies for Artificial Intelligence. Future of Life Institute Publ., 2020, 97 p.
6. Taeihagh A. Governance of artificial intelligence. Policy and Society, 2021, vol. 40 (2), pp. 137–157.
7. Dignum V. Responsible Artificial Intelligence: How to Develop and Use AI in a Responsible Way. Springer Publ., 2019, 127 p.
8. Doshi-Velez F., Kim B. Towards A Rigorous Science of Interpretable Machine Learning. arXiv:1702.08608, 2017, 13 p.
9. Selbst A.D., Powles J. Meaningful information and the right to explanation. International Data Privacy Law, 2017, vol. 7 (4), pp. 233–242.
10. Tene O., Polonetsky J. Big Data for All: Privacy and User Control in the Age of Analytics. Northwestern Journal of Technology and Intellectual Property, 2013, vol. 11 (5), pp. 239–273.
11. Barocas S., Selbst A.D. Big Dataʼs Disparate Impact. California Law Review, 2016, vol. 104,
pp. 671–732.
12. Goodman B., Flaxman S. European Union Regulations on Algorithmic Decision-Making and
a “Right to Explanation”. AI Magazine, 2017, vol. 38 (3), pp. 50–57.
13. Floridi L., Cowls J. A Unified Framework of Five Principles for AI in Society. Harvard Data Science Review, 2019, vol. 1, no 1, pp. 1–13.
14. Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation). Official Journal of the European Union, 2016, L. 119, pp. 1–88.
15. Algorithmic Accountability Act of 2019, H.R. 2231, 116th Cong. 2019.
16. Civil Rights Act of 1964, Pub. L. 88-352, 78 Stat. 241. 1964.
17. Angwin J., Tobin A., Varner M. Facebook (Still) Letting Housing Advertisers Exclude Users by Race. ProPublica, 2017, November 21.
18. Facebookʼs Ad Discrimination Problem, Statement of ACLU Washington Legislative Office. American Civil Liberties Union, 2018, September 18.
19. Schellekens M. Self-driving cars and the chilling effect of liability law. Computer Law & Security Review, 2015, vol. 31 (4), pp. 506–517.
20. Kaminski M.E. The Right to Explanation, Explained. Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 2019,
vol. 34, no 1, pp. 189–218.
21. Price W.N. Artificial Intelligence in Health Care: Applications and Legal Issues. The SciTech Lawyer, 2017, vol. 14 (1), pp. 10–13.
22. Mittelstadt B., Allo P., Taddeo M., Wachter S., Floridi L. The ethics of algorithms: Mapping the debate. Big Data & Society, 2016, vol. 3 (2), pp. 1–21.
23. Bryson J., Winfield A. Standardizing Ethical Design for Artificial Intelligence and Autonomous Systems. Computer, 2017, vol. 50 (5), pp. 116–119.
24. Tutt A. An FDA for Algorithms. Administrative Law Review, 2017, vol. 69, pp. 83–123.
25. Hagendorff T. The Ethics of AI Ethics: An Evaluation of Guidelines. Minds and Machines, 2020, vol. 30, pp. 99–120.
26. Ebers M. Regulating AI and Robotics: Ethical and Legal Challenges. Regulating Artificial Intelligence. Eds. T.E. Synodinou, P. Jougleux, C. Markou, T. Prastitou. Springer Publ., 2020, pp. 37–98.
27. Castelluccia C., Le Métayer D. Understanding algorithmic decision-making: Opportunities and challenges. Panel for the Future of Science and Technology, European Parliamentary Research Service, 2019, 94 p.
