ZAMONAVIY HUQUQIY DAVLATDA NOTARIATLARNING VAZIFALARI
Kalit so‘zlar:
notariat vazifalari, asosiy yo‘nalishlar, himoya qilish, qonun ustuvorligi, o‘ziga xos xususiyatlar, sertifikatlashAnnotatsiya
Ushbu ilmiy maqolada notariusning turli funksiyalari va ularning zamonaviy huquqiy davlatda amaliyotda qo‘llanishi ko‘rib chiqiladi. Muallif davlat huquqiy tizimi bilan bog‘liq holda notarial funksiyalarning mazmuni va maqsadli yo‘nalishini ochib beradi. Tadqiqotning dolzarbligi notariusning vazifalarini zamonaviy axborot jamiyati rivojlanishi nuqtayi nazaridan ko‘rib chiqishdan iborat, chunki u fuqarolar va yuridik shaxslarning huquqlari hamda qonuniy manfaatlarini himoya qilishni ta’minlaydi, huquqlarni himoya qilish mexanizmlarini amalga oshiradi. Fuqarolik bitimlari ishtirokchilarining soni doimiy ravishda yangilanadi va takomillashtiriladi. Ilmiy maqoladagi tadqiqotning maqsadi zamonaviy huquqiy davlatda notariusning asosiy funksiyalari va ularning xususiyatlarini ochib berishdan iborat. Tadqiqot natijasi shuni ko‘rsatadiki, fuqarolik muomalasini raqamlashtirish sharoitida notarial funksiyani bajarish raqamli vositalar va shu maqsadda yaratilgan elektron infratuzilmani jalb qilgan holda amalga oshiriladi. Bu zarur hujjatlarni birgalikda tezkorlik bilan olish, bitim taraflarining huquqiy xavfsizligini kafolatlaydigan sharoitlarda ma’lumot olish va notarial harakatlarni amalga oshirish imkonini beradi. O‘tkazilgan tadqiqot notariusning yuksak ahamiyatini hisobga olgan holda, fuqarolik muomalasini raqamlashtirish sharoitida notarius funksiyalarini samarali amalga oshirish uchun qo‘shimcha shart-sharoitlar yaratish ishlarini davom ettirish zarur, degan xulosaga kelish imkonini berdi.
Iqtiboslar
1. Gerasimov A.V., Nadtachayev P.V. Rol’ notariata v sovremennom grazhdanskom prave [The role of the notary in modern civil law]. Vestnik KrasGAU – Krasgau Bulletin. 2014, no. 12. Avialable at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/rol-notariata-v-sovremennom-grazhdanskom-prave.
2. Pereira A. European Tort Law 2004. Springer Vienna, 2006. pp. 479–509.
3. Weyts L. L’Europeanisation, une Entreprise positive pour une bonne Globalisation. Notarius International. 2001, no. 6. pp. 147–150.
4. Zotikov N.Z. Fiskal’naya funktsiya nalogov, yeye vliyaniye na dokhody byudzhetov razlichnykh urovney [The fiscal function of taxes, its impact on budget revenues at various levels]. Vestnik GUU – Gazette GU. 2023, no. 1. Avialable at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/fiskalnaya-funktsiya-nalogov-ee-vliyanie-na-dohody-byudzhetov-razlichnyh-urovney
5. Schedule of NSW Public Notaries Recommended Scale of Fees. NSW Government Gazette. 2008, no. 93.
6. Toure A. Regards croises sur la notion de groupe de societes en Afrique francophone. Notarius International. 2005, no. 10. pp. 21–28.
7. Pepin Y., Lachance M. National Report Quebec. Notarius International. 2003, no. 8, pp. 157–174.
8. Seliverstov Ye.A. Zarubezhnyy opyt notarial’nogo udostovereniya sdelok [Foreign experience in notarization of transactions]. Vestnik nauki, 2020, no. 2 (23). Avialable at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/zarubezhnyy-opyt-notarialnogo-udostovereniya-sdelok
9. Boyer V.M. Institut notarial’noy deyatel’nosti: ponyatiye, sushchnost’, soderzhaniye. [Institute of notarial activity: concept, essence, content. Scientific notes of the St. Petersburg University of Management Technologies and Economics]. 2009, no. 2 (24). Avialable at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/institut-notarialnoy-deyatelnosti-ponyatie-suschnost-soderzhanie
10. Uzdimayeva N.I. Funktsii yuridicheskikh dokumentov [Functions of legal documents]. Contentus. 2020, no. 8. Avialable at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/funktsii-yuridicheskih-dokumentov
11. Kucherenko P.A. Pravozashchitnaya funktsiya sovremennogo notariata [Human rights function of modern notaries]. Vestnik RUDN – RUDN University Bulletin. 2015, no. 2. Avialable at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/pravozaschitnaya-funktsiya-sovremennogo-notariata
12. Shatilov S.P. Pravookhranitel’naya funktsiya gosudarstva kak teoretiko-pravovaya kategoriya [The law enforcement function of the state as a theoretical and legal category]. 2018, no. 3. Avialable at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/pravoohranitelnaya-funktsiya-gosudarstva-kak-teoretiko-pravovaya-kategoriya
13. Fatkhelbayanov R.M. Pravookhranitel’naya deyatel’nost’ notariata v sovremennoy Rossii [Law enforcement activities of the notary in modern Russia]. Otechestvennaya yurisprudentsiya – Domestic jurisprudence. 2020, no. 3 (42). Avialable at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/pravoohranitelnaya-deyatelnost-notariata-v-sovremennoy-rossii
14. Kronfeld N.A. The Preservation and Discovery of Evidence Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 27. 78 Geo. L. J. p. 593. Lexis Nexis Academic. 9 September 2011.
15. Yaroshenko T.V. Preventivnaya funktsiya notariata: aktual’nyye voprosy [Preventive function of the notary: current issues]. Bulletin of the Baltic Federal University. I. Kant. 2021, no. 4. Avialable at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/preventivnaya-funktsiya-notariata-aktualnye-voprosy
16. Moiseyeva O.V. Funktsii pravorealizatsionnoy notarial’noy praktiki kak napravleniya vozdeystviya na obshchestvennyye otnosheniya. Vestnik PAGS [Functions of legal notarial practice as a direction of influence on public relations]. 2010, no. 4. Avialable at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/funktsii-pravorealizatsionnoy-notarialnoy-praktiki-kak-napravleniya-vozdeystviya-na-obschestvennye-otnosheniya
17. Semenova S.O. Pravovoye regulirovaniye notarial’noy deyatel’nosti v mezhdunarodnykh otnosheniyakh [Legal regulation of notarial activities in international relations]. E-Scio. 2022, no. 5 (68). Avialable at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/pravovoe-regulirovanie-notarialnoy-deyatelnosti-v-mezhdunarodnyh-otnosheniyah
18. Rozova N. A. Klyuchevyye osobennosti pravovogo regulirovaniya otvetstvennosti notariusov v zarubezhnykh stranakh [Key features of the legal regulation of notaries’ liability in foreign countries]. Molodoy uchenyy – Young Scientist. 2022, no. 52 (447), pp. 278–281.
19. Sefrioui H. Rapport National Maroc. Notarius International. 2005, no. 10. pp. 33–48.
