“ANIMUS FRAUDANDI”: XALQARO XUSUSIY HUQUQDA QONUNNI CHETLAB OʻTISHNI ISBOTLASHNING DOKTRINAL HUQUQIY ASOSLARI
Kalit so‘zlar:
animus fraudandi, xalqaro xususiy huquq, qonunni chetlab oʻtish, qonunni chetlab o‘tish (fraus legis), huquqni suiisteʼmol qilish, isbotlash majburiyati, sunʼiylik testi, bilvosita dalillarAnnotatsiya
Mazkur maqolada xalqaro xususiy huquqda qonunni chetlab o‘tish (fraus legis) muammosining protsessual jihatlari, xususan, uning subyektiv elementi – animus fraudandini isbotlash masalalari tahlil qilinadi. Unda qasdni isbotlash bilan bog‘liq tizimli muammolar, jumladan, axborot nomutanosibligi va motivlarning ko‘pligi masalalari ko‘rib chiqiladi. Qiyosiy tahlil hamda Yevropa Ittifoqi Sudining amaliyotiga tayangan holda muallif qasdni psixologik holat sifatida emas, balki harakatlarning sun’iyligidan dalolat beruvchi obyektiv ko‘rsatkichlar asosida aniqlash modelini taklif etadi. Dastlabki bosqichda sun’iylik mavjudligini ko‘rsatuvchi dalillar taqdim etilganda, haqiqiy iqtisodiy maqsad mavjudligini isbotlash majburiyatini javobgarga o‘tkazish nazarda tutiladigan isbotlash yukini taqsimlashning o‘zgaruvchan modeli asoslab beriladi. Shuningdek, mazkur doktrinani O‘zbekiston Respublikasi Fuqarolik kodeksining 9-moddasi doirasida qo‘llashning metodologik asoslari ishlab chiqiladi.
Iqtiboslar
Batiffol, H., & Lagarde, P. (1993). Droit international privé [Private international law] (8th ed.). L.G.D.J.
Briggs, A. (2019). Private international law in English courts (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.
Cadbury Schweppes plc & Cadbury Schweppes Overseas Ltd v. Commissioners of Inland Revenue, Case C-196/04, ECLI:EU:C:2006:544 (Court of Justice of the European Union, September 12, 2006). https://curia.europa.eu/juris/liste.jsf?num=C-196/04
Dicey, A. V., Morris, J. H. C., & Collins, L. (2022). Dicey, Morris & Collins on the conflict of laws (16th ed.). Sweet & Maxwell.
Egorov, A. V. (2011). K voprosu o razgranichenii obkhoda zakona i simulyatsii sdelki [On distinguishing evasion of law from simulation of a transaction]. Civil Law Bulletin, 11(2), 270–310.
Fawcett, J. J. (1990). Evasion of law and mandatory rules in private international law. Cambridge Law Journal, 49(1), 44–62. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008197300092011
Graveson, R. H. (1930). The doctrine of evasion of the law in England and America. Transactions of the Grotius Society, 16, 1–30. https://www.jstor.org/stable/742801
Halifax plc v. Commissioners of Customs & Excise, Case C-255/02, ECLI:EU:C:2006:121 (Court of Justice of the European Union, February 21, 2006). https://curia.europa.eu/juris/liste.jsf?num=C-255/02
Kegel, G., & Schurig, K. (2004). Internationales Privatrecht [International private law] (9th ed.). C. H. Beck.
Kofoed v. Skatteministeriet, Case C-321/05, ECLI:EU:C:2007:408 (Court of Justice of the European Union, July 5, 2007). https://curia.europa.eu/juris/liste.jsf?num=C-321/05
Lenaerts, A. (2013). The role of the principle fraus omnia corrumpit in the European Union: A possible evolution towards a general principle of law? Yearbook of European Law, 32(1), 481–524. https://doi.org/10.1093/yel/yet001
Mattias, J. (1953). La fraude à la loi [Fraud on the law]. Critical Review of Belgian Case Law, 1953, 5–35.
Muir Watt, H. (2011). Private international law beyond the schism. Transnational Legal Theory, 2(3), 347–427. https://doi.org/10.5235/204322111798209824
Muranov, A. I. (2004). “Obkhod zakona” v mezhdunarodnom chastnom prave: mnimost aktualnosti, otsutstvie pozitivno-pravovogo zakrepleniya i predelnaya diskretsionnost v primenenii [“Evasion of law” in private international law: The illusion of relevance, the absence of positive-law consolidation, and ultimate discretion in application]. International Public and Private Law, (3), 2–9.
Parra-Aranguren, G. (1988). The evasion of the law (fraude à la loi) in Venezuelan private international law. Collected Courses of the Hague Academy of International Law, 208, 87–183.
Republic of Uzbekistan. (1995, December 21). Civil Code of the Republic of Uzbekistan. Lex.uz. https://lex.uz/docs/-111189
Römer, H. J. (1955). Gesetzesumgehung im deutschen internationalen Privatrecht [Evasion of law in German private international law]. Hamburgische Universität.
Secretary of State for the Home Department v. Akrich, Case C-109/01, ECLI:EU:C:2003:491 (Court of Justice of the European Union, September 23, 2003). https://curia.europa.eu/juris/liste.jsf?num=C-109/01
Symeonides, S. C. (2016). Codifying choice of law around the world: An international comparative analysis. Oxford University Press.
Taruffo, M. (2009). La prova nel processo civile [Evidence in civil proceedings]. Giuffrè.
Teixeira, M. A. D. (2018). The relevance of the fraus legis institute in European Union law. Market and Competition Law Review, 2(1), 121–145. https://mclawreview.eu/index.php/mclawreview/article/view/31
Tetley, W. (1994). Evasion/fraude à la loi and avoidance of law. McGill Law Journal, 39(2), 303–330. https://lawjournal.mcgill.ca/article/evasion-fraude-a-la-loi-and-avoidance-of-the-law/
Weatherill, S. (2016). Cases and materials on EU law (12th ed.). Oxford University Press.
Zimmermann, R. (1996). The law of obligations: Roman foundations of the civilian tradition. Oxford University Press.
Yuklab Olishlar
Nashr qilingan
Son
Bo‘lim
Litsenziya
Mualliflik huquqi (c) 2026 YURISPRUDENSIYA
Ushbu ish Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ostida litsenziyalangan.
