TO‘LOVGА QOBILIYATSIZLIK VUJUDGА KELISHIGА АSOS BO‘LАDIGАN TАLАBLАR: PUL MАJBURIYATLАRI VА MАJBURIY TO‘LOVLАR
Kalit so‘zlar:
to‘lovga qobiliyatsizlik, bankrotlik, kreditor, qarzdor, reabilitatsiya, pul majburiyatlari, majburiy to‘lovlar, asosiy qarzAnnotatsiya
Ushbu maqolada to‘lovga qobiliyatsizlik holati vujudga kelishini aniqlash maqsadida kreditorlar tomonidan bildiriladigan barcha talablar tizimlashtirilgan. Mazkur talablar pul majburiyatlari va majburiy to‘lovlar sifatida ikki toifaga ajratilib, ularning tarkibiga qaysi qarzdorliklar kirishi batafsil yoritilgan. “Pul majburiyatlari” kategoriyasining mohiyatini yoritishda fuqarolik huquqi va mehnat huquqi normalari o‘zaro qiyoslangan, “majburiy to‘lovlar” tushunchasining mazmuni esa soliq qonunchiligi normalariga tayangan holda ochib berilgan. Tahlil natijasida to‘lovga qobiliyatsizlik to‘g‘risidagi qonunchilik uchun maqbul bo‘lgan, aniq va sodda kreditorlarning talablar ro‘yxati shakllantirilgan. Shuningdek, bankrotlik to‘g‘risidagi ishni qo‘zg‘atishda qaysi talablar inobatga olinishi lozimligi, bu boradagi xorijiy davlat tajribasi, bartaraf etish lozim bo‘lgan muammoli holatlar alohida o‘rganilgan. Bankrotlik to‘g‘risidagi ishni qo‘zg‘atish faqat birlamchi talablarga tayanilishi, ikkilamchi talablar (neustoyka, jarima, kompensatsiya va rag‘batlantirish summalari) ishni qo‘zg‘atishga asos bo‘lmasligi haqida xulosalarga kelingan. Bundan tashqari, tadqiqot davomida ayrim davlatlar qonunchiligida qo‘llaniladigan reabilitatsiya ishini qo‘zg‘atishga asos bo‘ladigan talablar, ayniqsa, shaxsiy munosabatlardan kelib chiqadigan va intellektual faoliyat bilan bog‘liq talablarning o‘rni masalasiga alohida eʼtibor qaratilgan.
Iqtiboslar
1. Vaccari E. Promoting fairness in English insolvency valuation cases. International Insolvency Review, 2020, vol. 29, iss. 2, pp. 285-312. doi: 10.1002/iir.1382/.
2. Bolshoy akademicheskiy slovar russkogo yazika [Big academic dictionary of the Russian language]. St. Petersburg, Nauka Publ., 2009, vol. 12, p. 315.
3. Novoselova L.А. Protsenti po denejnim obyazatelstvam [Interest on monetary obligations]. 2nd ed. Moscow, Statute, 2003, p. 24.
4. Lunts L.А. Dengi i denejnie obyazatelstva v grajdanskom prave [Money and monetary obligations in civil law]. Moscow, 1999, p. 155.
5. Аrbitrajnoe upravlenie: teoriya i praktika [Arbitration management: theory and practice]. General ed. V.V. Golubova. Moscow, Statute, 2000, p. 62.
6. Beklenisheva I.V. Ponyatie grajdansko-pravovogo dogovora (sravnitelno-pravovoe issledovanie) [The concept of a civil law contract (comparative legal research)], Abstract of PhD thesis. Yekaterinburg, 2004, p. 4.
7. Borisenkova T.V. Sootnoshenie chasntih i obshih interesov pri pravovom regulirovanii bankrotstva yuridicheskih lits [The ratio of private and common interests in the legal regulation of bankruptcy of legal entities]. PhD thesis. Moscow, 2008, p. 29.
8. Braginskiy M.I., Vitryanskiy V.V. Dogovornoe pravo [Contract law]. Book 1. General provisions. 2nd edition. Moscow, 2000, p. 22.
9. Xvan L.B. Soliq huquqi [Tax law]. Tashkent, Konsauditanform Publ., 2001, p. 19.
10. Mahkamov O.M. Soliq va boshqa majburiy to‘lovlarni to‘lashdan bo‘yin tovlashning jinoyat-huquqiy va kriminologik jihatlari [Criminal and criminological aspects of tax and other obligatory tax evasion]. PhD thesis. Tashkent, 2017, p. 20.
11. Izvekov S.S. Osobennosti pravovogo rejima nalogooblojeniya pri nesostoyatelnosti (bankrotstva) organizatsii [Features of the legal regime of taxation in case of insolvency (bankruptcy) of the organization]. PhD thesis. Yekaterinburg, 2018, p. 19.
12. Telyukina M.V. Osnovi konkursnogo prava [Fundamentals of Competition Law]. Moscow, 2004, pp. 135-192.
13. Ibratova F.Z. Tadbirkorlik subyektlarini bankrot deb topishning fuqarolik-huquqiy muammolari [Civil law problems of bankruptcy of business entities]. Doctor’s degree dissertation. Tashkent, 2021, pp. 26-27.
14. Shahdadi K.M., Rostamy A.A.A., Sharif S.J.S., Ranjbar M.H. Intellectual capital, liquidity, and bankruptcy likelihood. Journal of Corporate Accounting & Finance, 2020, vol. 31, iss. 4, pp. 21-32.
DOI: 10.1002/jcaf.22460/.
15. Ellias J.A. Bankruptcy Claims Trading. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 2018, vol. 15, iss. 4, pp. 772-799. DOI: 10.1111/jels.12204/.
16. Brotchie J., Morrison D. Insolvent trading and voluntary administration in Australia: economic winners and losers? Accounting & Finance, 2017, vol. 60, iss. 1, pp. 409-434. DOI: 10.1111/acfi.12319/.
17. Ruben Hollemans,Gijs van Dijck. “Come and talk”: The insolvency judge as de-escalator. International Insolvency Review, 2020, vol. 29, iss. 3, pp. 360-378. DOI: 10.1002/iir.1388/.
18. Margret J.E. Insolvency and tests of insolvency: an analysis of the “Balance Sheet” and ”Cashflow”. Australian Accounting Review, 2008, no. 12 (28), pp. 59-72. DOI: 10.1111/j.1835-2561.2002.tb00204.x/.
19. Maśnicka M., Kruczalak-Jankowska J. Evolution of consumer bankruptcy in Poland: A chance for a new life for insolvent debtors? International Insolvency Review, 2022, Early View, pp. 25-31.
DOI: 10.1002/iir.1457/.
