CLAIMS THAT LEAD TO INSOLVENCY: MONETARY OBLIGATIONS AND MANDATORY PAYMENTS
Keywords:
insolvency, bankruptcy, creditor, debtor, rehabilitation, monetary obligations, mandatory payments, main debtAbstract
This article systematizes all the claims imposed by creditors in order to determine the occurrence of an insolvency situation. These claims are divided into two categories: monetary obligations and mandatory payments, and the debts included in them are described in detail. In highlighting the essence of the category “monetary obligations”, the norms of civil law and labor law are mutually compared, and the content of the concept of “mandatory payments” in accordance with the norms of tax legislation is also revealed. As a result of the analysis, a list of clear and simple creditors’ claims has been formed, which is acceptable at the bankruptcy legislation. Also the requirements that should be taken into account when initiating a bankruptcy case and the experience of a foreign state was studied in this regard, as well as problematic conditions that need to be eliminated. It was concluded that the initiation of a bankruptcy case should be based only on primary claims; secondary claims (non-payment, fines, amounts of compensation and incentives) should not be the basis for the initiation of the case. In addition, in the course of the study the question of the role of requirements arising from personal relationships and requirements related to intellectual activity, which will become the basis for initiating a rehabilitation case, which is used in the legislation of some states was also considered.
References
1. Vaccari E. Promoting fairness in English insolvency valuation cases. International Insolvency Review, 2020, vol. 29, iss. 2, pp. 285-312. doi: 10.1002/iir.1382/.
2. Bolshoy akademicheskiy slovar russkogo yazika [Big academic dictionary of the Russian language]. St. Petersburg, Nauka Publ., 2009, vol. 12, p. 315.
3. Novoselova L.А. Protsenti po denejnim obyazatelstvam [Interest on monetary obligations]. 2nd ed. Moscow, Statute, 2003, p. 24.
4. Lunts L.А. Dengi i denejnie obyazatelstva v grajdanskom prave [Money and monetary obligations in civil law]. Moscow, 1999, p. 155.
5. Аrbitrajnoe upravlenie: teoriya i praktika [Arbitration management: theory and practice]. General ed. V.V. Golubova. Moscow, Statute, 2000, p. 62.
6. Beklenisheva I.V. Ponyatie grajdansko-pravovogo dogovora (sravnitelno-pravovoe issledovanie) [The concept of a civil law contract (comparative legal research)], Abstract of PhD thesis. Yekaterinburg, 2004, p. 4.
7. Borisenkova T.V. Sootnoshenie chasntih i obshih interesov pri pravovom regulirovanii bankrotstva yuridicheskih lits [The ratio of private and common interests in the legal regulation of bankruptcy of legal entities]. PhD thesis. Moscow, 2008, p. 29.
8. Braginskiy M.I., Vitryanskiy V.V. Dogovornoe pravo [Contract law]. Book 1. General provisions. 2nd edition. Moscow, 2000, p. 22.
9. Xvan L.B. Soliq huquqi [Tax law]. Tashkent, Konsauditanform Publ., 2001, p. 19.
10. Mahkamov O.M. Soliq va boshqa majburiy to‘lovlarni to‘lashdan bo‘yin tovlashning jinoyat-huquqiy va kriminologik jihatlari [Criminal and criminological aspects of tax and other obligatory tax evasion]. PhD thesis. Tashkent, 2017, p. 20.
11. Izvekov S.S. Osobennosti pravovogo rejima nalogooblojeniya pri nesostoyatelnosti (bankrotstva) organizatsii [Features of the legal regime of taxation in case of insolvency (bankruptcy) of the organization]. PhD thesis. Yekaterinburg, 2018, p. 19.
12. Telyukina M.V. Osnovi konkursnogo prava [Fundamentals of Competition Law]. Moscow, 2004, pp. 135-192.
13. Ibratova F.Z. Tadbirkorlik subyektlarini bankrot deb topishning fuqarolik-huquqiy muammolari [Civil law problems of bankruptcy of business entities]. Doctor’s degree dissertation. Tashkent, 2021, pp. 26-27.
14. Shahdadi K.M., Rostamy A.A.A., Sharif S.J.S., Ranjbar M.H. Intellectual capital, liquidity, and bankruptcy likelihood. Journal of Corporate Accounting & Finance, 2020, vol. 31, iss. 4, pp. 21-32.
DOI: 10.1002/jcaf.22460/.
15. Ellias J.A. Bankruptcy Claims Trading. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 2018, vol. 15, iss. 4, pp. 772-799. DOI: 10.1111/jels.12204/.
16. Brotchie J., Morrison D. Insolvent trading and voluntary administration in Australia: economic winners and losers? Accounting & Finance, 2017, vol. 60, iss. 1, pp. 409-434. DOI: 10.1111/acfi.12319/.
17. Ruben Hollemans,Gijs van Dijck. “Come and talk”: The insolvency judge as de-escalator. International Insolvency Review, 2020, vol. 29, iss. 3, pp. 360-378. DOI: 10.1002/iir.1388/.
18. Margret J.E. Insolvency and tests of insolvency: an analysis of the “Balance Sheet” and ”Cashflow”. Australian Accounting Review, 2008, no. 12 (28), pp. 59-72. DOI: 10.1111/j.1835-2561.2002.tb00204.x/.
19. Maśnicka M., Kruczalak-Jankowska J. Evolution of consumer bankruptcy in Poland: A chance for a new life for insolvent debtors? International Insolvency Review, 2022, Early View, pp. 25-31.
DOI: 10.1002/iir.1457/.
