FIRIBGАRLIK HOLАTLАRIDА TERGOVGА QАDАR TEKSHIRUV: TАKTIK XUSUSIYATLАRI, MUАMMOLАRI VА UNING YECHIMLАRI
Kalit so‘zlar:
firibgarlik, fiksatsiya, elektron dalil, axborot-kommunikatsiya texnologiyalari, dasturiy taʼminot, tergovga qadar tekshiruvAnnotatsiya
Texnik rivojlantirish, tadbirkorlik faoliyatini modernizatsiya qilish, pul topish, biznes qilishning yangi turlari paydo bo‘lishi, iqtisodiy munosabatlarning rivojlanishi bu sohaga firibgarlarning qiziqishi kuchayishiga olib kelgan. Firibgarlikning anʼanaviy turlari, masalan, jabrlanuvchini ishga joylashtirish bilan aldash orqali pullarini egallab olish kabi firibgarlik jinoyatlari zamonaviy turdagi (Аxborot-kommunikatsiya texnologiyalari, Internet tarmog‘i, dastur taʼminotlari, ijtimoiy tarmoqlar, to‘lov kartalari yordamida sodir etilgan) firibgarlik jinoyatlaridek jabrlanuvchilar doirasini qamrab olmaydi. Ushbu maqolada firibgarlikning zamonaviy turlari bo‘yicha tergovga qadar tekshiruv o‘tkazishning protsessual tartibi, shuningdek, uni o‘tkazishdagi taktik xususiyatlar o‘rganilgan. Firibgarlikning zamonaviy shakllarini tergov qilishdagi qiyinchiliklarni hal qilish uchun, masalan, fuqarolik munosabatlari ostida yashiringan firibgarliklarni aniqlash mezonlari ishlab chiqilgan. Maqolada tergovga qadar tekshiruv paytida aniqlanishi lozim bo‘lgan masalalar va holatlar ro‘yxati, shuningdek, yangi turdagi dalillarni olib qo‘yish, ko‘zdan kechirish va ro‘yxatdan o‘tkazish tartibi keltirilgan. Jamiyatning barcha sohalarini kompyuterlashtirishga qaramay, yangi turdagi dalillar va izlarni (elektron) aniqlash, elektron dalillarni olib qo‘yish, ko‘zdan kechirish va ro‘yxatdan o‘tkazish tartibi huquqiy tartibga solinmagan (“elektron dalillar” tushunchasi hattoki mavjud emas), shuningdek, bunday dalillarni aniqlash va olib chiqish uchun muayyan tergov harakatlarini o‘tkazishda yagona yondashuv yo‘q. Maqolada olimlarning “elektron dalillar” konseptual apparati, zamonaviy texnologiyalar va dasturlardan foydalangan holda, elektron dalillarni olib qo‘yish, ko‘zdan kechirish va rasmiylashtirish taktikasi haqidagi fikrlari keltirilgan. Xulosa qismida jinoyat-protsessual qonunchiligiga o‘zgartish va qo‘shimchalar kiritish bo‘yicha takliflar ilgari surilgan.
Iqtiboslar
1. The 2020 Report to the Nations – the ACFE’s 11th study on the costs and effects of occupational fraud.2020 Global study on occupational fraud and abuse. P. 4.
2. Spravka General’noy prokuratury Respubliki Uzbekistan ot 10.02.2020 [Certificate of the General Prosecutor’s Office of the Republic of Uzbekistan dated 2020, February 10].
3. Spravka Sledstvennogo departamenta pri MVD Respubliki Uzbekistan. Svedeniya o sovershennykh moshennichestvakh za 2020 god [Certificate of the Investigation Department under the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Republic of Uzbekistan. Information about committed scams for 2020.]. Available at: https://tergov.uz/ru/news/svedenja-o-sovershennyh-moshennichestvah-za-2020-god/ (accessed 12.02.2021).
4. Experts gather to tackle telecom fraud and other scams. Available at: https://www.interpol.int/News-and-Events/News/2019/Experts-gather-to-tackle-telecom-fraud-and-other-scams/.
5. Williams J., Joinson A.N. Developing a measure of information seeking about phishing. Journal of Cybersecurity, 2020, vol. 6, no. 1, p. 13.
6. Bozinis A. Countering Fraud and Corruption. Portsmouth University, 2014, p. 8.
7. Albrecht W.S., Albrecht C.C., Albrecht C.D. Fraud Examination. 3rd ed., Thomson, South-Western, 2009, p. 8. Available at: https://books.google.co.id/books?id=R6q5BwAAQBAJ&printsec =copyright&hl=id#v=onepage&q&f=false/.
8. Turabbayev H.A. Features of fraud investigation. Abstract of PhD thesis. Tashkent, 2001, p. 7.
9. Altiev R.S. Criminal-legal and criminological aspects of fraud. Abstract of PhD thesis. Tashkent, 2020, p. 4.
10. Volokhova O.V. Features of the investigation of fraud committed against citizens. Abstract of PhD thesis. Moscow, 2003, p. 7. Available at: https://www.dissercat.com/content/osobennosti-rassledovaniya-moshennichestva-sovershennogo-v-otnoshenii-grazhdan/.
11. Komissarova Ya.V. Criminalistic study of personality. A scientific and practical guide for masters. Moscow, Prospect Publ., 2017, 24 p. Available at: http://lib.lawinstitut.ru/ru/-virtualexposition/newbooks/82-932176.pdf/.
12. Pilipenko Yu. Sanctions for “criminal pressure” on business: will the security forces remain unpunished? Practical accounting, 2017, no. 1, p. 34. Available at: http://base .garant.ru/.
13. Barsukov E.A., Belousov I.V. The subject of proof at the stage of initiation of a criminal case. Central Scientific Bulletin, 2017, no. 11, pp. 39-41. Available at: http://cscb.su/n / 021101/021101022.html/.
14. Razhabov B.A. Problems associated with ensuring compliance with the general conditions of proof in the criminal process of the Republic of Uzbekistan. Problems of modern science and education, 2020, no. 4 (149), p. 60. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/problemy-svyazannye-s-obespecheniem-soblyudeniya-obschih-usloviy-dokazyvaniya-v-ugolovnom-protsesse-respubliki-uzbekistan/.
15. Matchanov A.A. About the peculiarities of obtaining evidence in electronic (digital) form in the investigation of cybercrime. Mutual legal assistance in obtaining electronic evidence and cross-border investigations of crimes. A handbook based on the results of a regional seminar for criminal justice practitioners in Central Asia. Tashkent, 2020, p. 72.
16. Zigura N.A. Computer information as a type of evidence in the criminal process of Russia. Abstract of PhD thesis. Chelyabinsk, 2010. Available at: https://www.dissercat.com/content/kompyuternaya-informatsiya-kak-vid-dokazatelstv-v-ugolovnom-protsesse-rossii/.
17. Learner D.E. Electronic crime scene investigation. New York, Nova Science Publ. Inc., 2009, p. 3.
18. Goodison S.E., Davis R.C., Jackson B.A. Digital evidence and the U.S. criminal justice system identifying technology and other needs to more effectively acquire and utilize digital evidence. P. 22. Available at: http://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR890.html/.
19. Vekhov V.B., Smagorinsky B.P., Kovalev S.A. Electronic traces in the system of criminalistics. Forensic examination, 2016, no. 2 (46), pp. 10-19.
20. Gorelov M.V. Electronic evidence in civil proceedings of Russia: questions of theory and practice. Abstract of PhD thesis. Yekaterinburg, 2005, p. 11. Available at: https://www.dissercat.com/content/elektronnye-dokazatelstva-v-grazhdanskom-sudoproiz-vodstve - rossii- voprosy-teorii-i-praktiki/.
21. Sadyrova M.S., Menzhega M.M. Inspection of electronic devices as an independent investigative action. Legal sciences: problems and prospects. Proceedings of the IV International Scientific Conference. Kazan, 2016, May. Kazan, Buk, 2016, pp. 279-281. Available at: https://moluch.ru/conf/law/archive/181/10391/ (accessed 15.02.2021).
22. Arslanova A.R. Problems of seizure of objects and documents before the initiation of a criminal case. Gaps in Russian legislation, 2015, p. 247. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/problem-izyatiya-predmetov-i-dokumentov-do-vozbuzhdeniya-ugolovnogo-dela/ (accessed 17.10.2019).
23. Novikov S.A. Materials of pre-investigation verification in proving criminal cases: current problems and new approaches. Bulletin of the St. Petersburg University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia, 2013, no. 3 (59), p. 74. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/materialy-dosledstvennoy-proverki-v-dokazyvanii-po-ugolovnym-delam-aktualnye-problemy-i-novye-podhody/.
24. Osteregajtes moshennikov [Beware of scammers]. Available at: https://uzcard.uz/index.php/ru/novosti-uzcard/item/878-osteregajtes-moshennikov/.
