JINOYAT ISHINI QOʻZGʻATISHNI RAD ETISH: NAZARIY VA AMALIY MUAMMOLAR
Kalit so‘zlar:
jinoyat protsessi, jinoyat ishi, jinoyat ishini qoʻzgʻatish bosqichi, dolzarb muammolar, jinoyat-protsessual normalar, jinoyat ishini qoʻzgʻatishni rad etishAnnotatsiya
Mazkur maqolada jinoyat-protsessual huquqining jinoyat ishini qoʻzgʻatishni rad etish institutiga oid dolzarb muammolari tahlil qilingan. Ushbu institut jinoyat-protsessual huquq tizimida muhim ahamiyatga ega, chunki tayyorlanayotgan yoki sodir etilgan jinoyat haqidagi kelib tushgan ariza yoki xabarning taqdiri unga bogʻliqdir. Ushbu institutni batafsil tahlil qilish maqsadida muallif tomonidan huquqni qoʻllash amaliyotini tartibga solishga qaratilgan normativ-huquqiy, shuningdek, ichki-idoraviy hujjatlar oʻrganilgan. Jinoyat ishini qoʻzgʻatishni rad etish institutiga oid bugungi kungacha mavjud boʻlgan ilmiy tadqiqotlar asosida muallif jinoyat ishini qoʻzgʻatishni asosli va qonuniy rad etish mezonlarini qiyosiy tahlil qiladi. Muallif jinoyat ishini qoʻzgʻatishni rad etishning protsessual tartibini oʻrganib chiqib, jinoyat uchun javobgarlikni nazarda tutuvchi, belgilarni tekshirish uchun asos boʻluvchi qarorda Oʻzbekiston Respublikasi JPKning normalarida nazarda tutilgan bunday qarorni qabul qilish uchun asoslar, band, qism, moddaga havolalarni koʻrsatish zarurligini taʼkidlaydi. Mazkur tartibning buzilishi ushbu qarorning yuridik kuchining yoʻqotilishiga olib kelishi mumkin. Jinoyat ishini qoʻzgʻatishni rad etish toʻgʻrisidagi qarorning toʻgʻri qabul qilinishi shaxsning noqonuniy va asossiz jinoiy javobgarlikka tortilishining oldini olishi mumkin.
Iqtiboslar
1. Dannyye Gosudarstvennogo komiteta po statistike Respubliki Uzbekistan [Data of the State Committee on Statistics of the Republic of Uzbekistan]. Available at: https://stat.uz/.
2. Dannyye Sledstvennogo departamenta pri Ministerstve vnutrennikh del Respubliki Uzbekistan [Data of the Investigation Department under the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Republic of Uzbekistan]. Available at: https://tergov.uz/.
3. Recorded offences by offence category – police data. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/crim_off_cat/default/table?lang=en/.
4. Sostoyaniye prestupnosti v gosudarstvakh-uchastnikakh Sodruzhestva Nezavisimykh Gosudarstv v 2019 godu [The state of crime in the member states of the Commonwealth of Independent States in 2019]. Coordinating Council of Prosecutors General of the Member States of the Commonwealth of Independent States. Available at: http://www.ksgp-cis.ru/about/obzory/sostojanie-prestupnosti-v-2019-godu/.
5. Serjanov V.N. Otkaz v vozbuzhdenii ugolovnogo dela [Refusal to initiate criminal proceedings]. Abstract of PhD thesis. Moscow, 2004, pp. 12–14.
6. Maslov A.V., Klimentov A.A. Otkaz v vozbuzhdenii ugolovnogo dela: pravovaya priroda i problemy regulirovaniya [Refusal to initiate criminal proceedings: legal nature and regulatory issues]. Law: History and Modernity, 2019, vol. 4, no. 9, pp. 117–121. DOI: 10.17277/pravo.2019.04.pp.117-121/.
7. Khudaybergenov B.K. The issues of considering reports and allegations of crime. European Journal of Humanities and Educational Advancements, 2021, no. 2 (4), pp. 88–90. Available at: https://scholarzest.com/index.php/ejhea/article/view/602/ (accessed 29.09.2022).
8. Khidoyatov B. Stages of legal regulation of inquiry in the Republic of Uzbekistan. The American Journal of Political Science Law and Criminology, 2020, vol. 2, no. 11, pp. 179–186. DOI: 10.37547/tajpslc/Volume02Issue11-30/.
9. Khidoyatov B., Khudaybergenov B., Shakhi S. Optimizatsiya pervonachalnoy stadii ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva [Optimization of the initial stage of criminal proceedings]. Society and Innovation, 2022, no. 3 (1/S), pp. 70–77. DOI: 10.47689/2181-1415-vol3-iss1/S-pp70-77/.
10. Jinoyat ishini qo‘zg‘atish institutini takomillashtirish bo‘yicha so‘rovnoma [Questionnaire on improvement of criminal prosecution institute]. Available at: https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1dbVDSuuDkMI5aPJ7YfhWYx1i48BqyL9AGmliuup0bjc/edit/.
11. Khidoyatov B.B., Fayziyev Sh.F. Istoricheskoye razvitiye protsessualnoy deyatel’nosti organov doznaniya na territorii Respubliki Uzbekistan [Historical development of the procedural activity of the bodies of inquiry on the territory of the Republic of Uzbekistan]. Russian Investigator, 2016, no. 22, pp. 47–51. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=27385329/.
12. Lukozhev Kh.M. Protsessual’naya samostoyatel’nost’ sledovatelya i doznavatelya v sovremennom ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve [Procedural independence of the investigator and the inquirer in modern criminal proceedings]. Theory and Practice of Social Development, 2021, no. 12, pp. 128–133. DOI: 10.24158/tipor.2021.12.16/.
13. Khudaybergenov B.K. Issues of improving the institution of criminal proceedings: comparative analysis. Conferences, 2021, vol. 1, no. 1.
14. Gordeyev A.YU. Otkaz v vozbuzhdenii ugolovnogo dela [Refusal to initiate criminal proceedings]. Abstract of PhD thesis. Moscow, 2006, p. 10.
15. Rossinskiy S., Rakhmonova S. Stadiya vozbuzhdeniya ugolovnogo dela: kak razreshit’ preslovutyye protivorechiya? [The stage of initiating a criminal case: how to resolve the notorious contradictions?]. Society and Innovation, 2021, no. 8 (1/S), pp. 68–76. DOI: 10.47689/2181-1415-vol2-iss8/S-pp68-76/.
