ISH YURITISHNI ISTISNO QILUVCHI HOLАTLАRNING HUQUQIY TАRTIBGА SOLINISH MUАMMOLАRI
Kalit so‘zlar:
ayblilik, jinoyatga oid ish, qo‘zg‘atish, tugatish, rad etish, ish yurituvni istisno qiluvchi holatlar, reabilitatsiyaAnnotatsiya
Ushbu maqolada ish yuritishni istisno qiluvchi holatlarning huquqiy tartibga solinishi muammolari amaliy jihatdan tadqiq etilgan. Shuningdek, maqolada tergovga qadar tekshiruv natijasi yuzasidan amaliyotda qabul qilinayotgan jinoyat ishini qo‘zg‘atishni rad etish qarorlarining O‘zbekiston Respublikasi Jinoyat-protsessual kodeksi 84-moddasining “Аyblilik to‘g‘risidagi masalani hal qilmay turib, jinoyat ishini tugatish uchun asoslar” deb nomlanganligi va uning asoslariga qanchalik mosligi hamda vujudga kelayotgan kollizion holatlar o‘rganilgan. Maqolada jinoyat protsessida reabilitatsiya etiluvchi asoslarning alohida bobda aks ettirilishi zarurati, mazkur asoslarning esa ish yurituvni istisno qiluvchi holatlar normasida belgilanishi lozimligi borasida fikrlar bildirib o‘tilgan. Shuningdek, maqolada xorij davlatlarining jinoyat-protsessual qonunchiligida aks etgan jinoyatga oid ishlarni rad etish va tugatish asoslarining mazmuni va afzalliklari o‘rganilgan. Tadqiqotda analiz, sintez, induksiya, deduksiya, qiyosiy-huquqiy tahlil kabi metodlar qo‘llangan. Tadqiqot ishida ilg‘or xorijiy tajriba, ilmiy-nazariy qarashlar va tergov hamda sud amaliyoti o‘rganilgan bo‘lib, buning natijasi o‘laroq O‘zbekiston Respublikasining Jinoyat-protsessual kodeksiga tegishli o‘zgartirish va qo‘shimchalar kiritish bo‘yicha taklif va tavsiyalar ishlab chiqilgan.
Iqtiboslar
1. Murodov B.B. Jinojat ishini tugatish institutini takomillashtirish [Improvement of the institution of termination of a criminal case]. Abstract of Doctor’s degree dissertation. Tashkent, 2018, 33 p.
2. Berdiyev Sh. Jinojat qonunlarining liberallashtirilishi jarayonida jinoiy javobgarlikdan ozod qilishni takomillashtirish muammolari [Problems of improving the release of criminal liability in the process of liberalization of criminal laws]. Doctor’s degree dissertation. Tashkent, 2011,
p. 155.
3. Tergovga qadar tekshiruv [Investigation until the investigation]. Tashkent, Military technical institute of the National Guard of the Republic of Uzbekistan, 2019, p. 238.
4. Yuldoshbekov A. O‘zbekiston Respublikasi sud-huquq sohasini rivojlantirishda jinoyat-protsessual qonunchiligini takomillashtirish masalalari [Issues of improvement of criminal-procedural legislation in the development of judicial-legal sphere of the Republic of Uzbekistan]. Juridik fanlar ahborotnomasi – Review of Legal Sciences, pp. 157–162.
5. Vasil’ev F.Yu. Institut otkaza v vozbuzhdenii ugolovnogo dela [Institute of refusal to initiate criminal proceedings]. Abstract of PhD thesis. St. Petersburg, 2016, pp. 14–18.
6. O‘zbekiston Respublikasining jinoyat protsessi [Criminal Procedure of the Republic of Uzbekistan]. Tashkent, Academy of Mia of the Republic of Uzbekistan, 2012, pp. 309–310.
7. O`zbekiston Respublikasi Harbiy prokuraturasi tergovchilari va jinoyat-protsessual huquqi mutahassislari o`rtasida o`tkazilgan so`rov natijalari [The results of the survey conducted among investigators of the military prosecutor’s Office of the Republic of Uzbekistan and specialists of criminal-prosessual law]. Tashkent, 2022.
8. Bordilovskiy Je.I., Galustyan O.A. Priostanovleniye, vozobnovleniye, prekrashheniye ugolovnogo dela i okonchaniye sledstviya s obvinitel’nym zaklyucheniyem [Suspension, resumption, termination of the criminal case and the end of the investigation with an indictment]. Moscow, 2004, pp. 30–33.
9. Murodov B.B. Jinoyat ishini tugatish: nazariya va amaliyot [Ending the criminal case: theory and practice]. Tashkent, Academy of the Ministry of internal affairs of the Republic of Uzbekistan, 2015,
pp. 15–16.
10. Ugolovno-protsessual’nyy kodeks FRG [The Criminal Procedure Code of Germany]. Transl. of the German Foundation for International Legal Cooperation and the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe. 2016, p. 230.
11. The Criminal Procedure Code of Georgia. Ad. 2009, October 09, no. 1772-IIc.
12. The Criminal Procedure Code of the Republic of Armenia, 1998, September 1, no. ZR-248.
13. The Criminal Procedure Code of the People’s Republic of China, Ad. at the 2nd session of the National People’s Congress of the Fifth Convocation, 1979, July 1.
14. Japanese criminal-prosessual code – Keydzi-sashe-Ho, 1948, July 10, no. 131.
15. Criminal Procedure Act of South Korea – Hansa-son-biop, 1954, September 23, no. 341.
16. Ugolovno-protsessual’noye pravo OAE. Osnovnyye polozheniya stat’ey 20-21 [Criminal Procedure law of the UAE. Main provisions article 20-21].
17. Criminal Procedure Law – Saudi Arabia Criminal Procedure Law Royal Decree, 2001, October 16, no. (M/39).
18. O`zbekiston yuridik ensiklopediyasi [Legal Encyclopedia of Uzbekistan]. Tashkent, Adolat Publ., 2010, p. 380.
19. Mirolyubov N.I. Reabilitatsiya kak spestial’nyy pravovoy institut [Rehabilitation as a special legal institution]. Kazan, 1902, p. 224.
20. Orlova A.A. Reabilitatsiya» [ Rehabilitation]. 2007, Article 112.
21. Konstantinov P., Stukanov A. Institut reabilitatsii [Institute of Rehabilitation]. Zakonnost’ – Legality, 2004, no. 7, p. 106.
22. The Criminal Procedure Code of the Republic of Tadzhikistan, of December 3, 2009 (with amendments and additions as of 07/19/2022)
23. Criminal Procedure Code of the Kyrgyz Republic No. 129 dated October 28, 2021.
24. Criminal Procedure Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan, amend. and add. 2022, September 3.
25. Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation, 2001, December 18, no. 174-FZ.
26. The Criminal Procedure Code of the Republic of Azerbaijan, app. by the Law of the Republic of Azerbaijan, 2000, July 14, no. 907-IQ, amend. and add. 2022, April 15.
