PROBLEMS OF LEGAL REGULATION OF CIRCUMSTANCES EXCLUDING PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE
Keywords:
guilt, criminal case, initiation, termination, refusal, circumstances excluding the proceedings, rehabilitationAbstract
In this article, the problems of legal regulation of circumstances excluding proceedings are investigated from a practical point of view. The article also examines the degree of conformity of decisions taken in practice based on the results of a pre-investigation check to refuse to monitor a criminal case with the grounds for terminating a criminal case without resolving the issue of guilt of Article 84 of the Criminal Procedure Code of the Republic of Uzbekistan, as well as conflicting circumstances that arise. The author expresses the opinion that the rehabilitated grounds in the Criminal Procedure case should be reflected in a separate chapter, and these grounds should be established in the norm of circumstances precluding the proceedings. The article also examines the content and advantages of grounds for refusal and termination of criminal cases, which is reflected in the Criminal Procedure legislation of foreign states. The study used such methods as analysis, synthesis, induction, deduction, comparative legal analysis. In the research work, advanced foreign experience, scientific and theoretical views, and investigative and judicial practice were studied, as a result of which proposals and recommendations have been developed for making appropriate amendments and additions to the Criminal Procedure Code of the Republic of Uzbekistan.
References
1. Murodov B.B. Jinojat ishini tugatish institutini takomillashtirish [Improvement of the institution of termination of a criminal case]. Abstract of Doctor’s degree dissertation. Tashkent, 2018, 33 p.
2. Berdiyev Sh. Jinojat qonunlarining liberallashtirilishi jarayonida jinoiy javobgarlikdan ozod qilishni takomillashtirish muammolari [Problems of improving the release of criminal liability in the process of liberalization of criminal laws]. Doctor’s degree dissertation. Tashkent, 2011,
p. 155.
3. Tergovga qadar tekshiruv [Investigation until the investigation]. Tashkent, Military technical institute of the National Guard of the Republic of Uzbekistan, 2019, p. 238.
4. Yuldoshbekov A. O‘zbekiston Respublikasi sud-huquq sohasini rivojlantirishda jinoyat-protsessual qonunchiligini takomillashtirish masalalari [Issues of improvement of criminal-procedural legislation in the development of judicial-legal sphere of the Republic of Uzbekistan]. Juridik fanlar ahborotnomasi – Review of Legal Sciences, pp. 157–162.
5. Vasil’ev F.Yu. Institut otkaza v vozbuzhdenii ugolovnogo dela [Institute of refusal to initiate criminal proceedings]. Abstract of PhD thesis. St. Petersburg, 2016, pp. 14–18.
6. O‘zbekiston Respublikasining jinoyat protsessi [Criminal Procedure of the Republic of Uzbekistan]. Tashkent, Academy of Mia of the Republic of Uzbekistan, 2012, pp. 309–310.
7. O`zbekiston Respublikasi Harbiy prokuraturasi tergovchilari va jinoyat-protsessual huquqi mutahassislari o`rtasida o`tkazilgan so`rov natijalari [The results of the survey conducted among investigators of the military prosecutor’s Office of the Republic of Uzbekistan and specialists of criminal-prosessual law]. Tashkent, 2022.
8. Bordilovskiy Je.I., Galustyan O.A. Priostanovleniye, vozobnovleniye, prekrashheniye ugolovnogo dela i okonchaniye sledstviya s obvinitel’nym zaklyucheniyem [Suspension, resumption, termination of the criminal case and the end of the investigation with an indictment]. Moscow, 2004, pp. 30–33.
9. Murodov B.B. Jinoyat ishini tugatish: nazariya va amaliyot [Ending the criminal case: theory and practice]. Tashkent, Academy of the Ministry of internal affairs of the Republic of Uzbekistan, 2015,
pp. 15–16.
10. Ugolovno-protsessual’nyy kodeks FRG [The Criminal Procedure Code of Germany]. Transl. of the German Foundation for International Legal Cooperation and the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe. 2016, p. 230.
11. The Criminal Procedure Code of Georgia. Ad. 2009, October 09, no. 1772-IIc.
12. The Criminal Procedure Code of the Republic of Armenia, 1998, September 1, no. ZR-248.
13. The Criminal Procedure Code of the People’s Republic of China, Ad. at the 2nd session of the National People’s Congress of the Fifth Convocation, 1979, July 1.
14. Japanese criminal-prosessual code – Keydzi-sashe-Ho, 1948, July 10, no. 131.
15. Criminal Procedure Act of South Korea – Hansa-son-biop, 1954, September 23, no. 341.
16. Ugolovno-protsessual’noye pravo OAE. Osnovnyye polozheniya stat’ey 20-21 [Criminal Procedure law of the UAE. Main provisions article 20-21].
17. Criminal Procedure Law – Saudi Arabia Criminal Procedure Law Royal Decree, 2001, October 16, no. (M/39).
18. O`zbekiston yuridik ensiklopediyasi [Legal Encyclopedia of Uzbekistan]. Tashkent, Adolat Publ., 2010, p. 380.
19. Mirolyubov N.I. Reabilitatsiya kak spestial’nyy pravovoy institut [Rehabilitation as a special legal institution]. Kazan, 1902, p. 224.
20. Orlova A.A. Reabilitatsiya» [ Rehabilitation]. 2007, Article 112.
21. Konstantinov P., Stukanov A. Institut reabilitatsii [Institute of Rehabilitation]. Zakonnost’ – Legality, 2004, no. 7, p. 106.
22. The Criminal Procedure Code of the Republic of Tadzhikistan, of December 3, 2009 (with amendments and additions as of 07/19/2022)
23. Criminal Procedure Code of the Kyrgyz Republic No. 129 dated October 28, 2021.
24. Criminal Procedure Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan, amend. and add. 2022, September 3.
25. Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation, 2001, December 18, no. 174-FZ.
26. The Criminal Procedure Code of the Republic of Azerbaijan, app. by the Law of the Republic of Azerbaijan, 2000, July 14, no. 907-IQ, amend. and add. 2022, April 15.
