MASʼULIYATI CHEKLANGAN JAMIYAT ISHTIROKCHILARINING UMUMIY YIGʻILISH QARORI YUZASIDAN NIZOLASHISH ORQALI KORPORATIV HUQUQLARINI HIMOYA QILISHNING AYRIM MASALALARI
Kalit so‘zlar:
umumiy yigʻilish qarori, oʻz-oʻzidan haqiqiy boʻlmagan qaror, nizoli qaror, yuridik fakt, ishtirokchilarning huquqlarini amalga oshirish, himoya qilish, daʼvo muddatiAnnotatsiya
Maqolada umumiy yigʻilish qarorining huquqiy tabiatini yoritish barobarida umumiy yigʻilish qarorlarini haqiqiy emas deb topish bilan bogʻliq sud amaliyoti tahlil qilinib, ishtirokchilarning sudga murojaat qilish huquqi va tartibidan boshlab bunday toifadagi nizolarning sudda koʻrib chiqilishi va sud hujjatining ijro etilishiga qadar boʻlgan jarayonlar yoritilgan. Shuningdek, umumiy yigʻilish qarori ishtirokchilarning xohish-irodasiga asosan vujudga keladigan alohida yuridik fakt ekanligi taʼkidlangan holda bu boradagi turli xil yondashuvlar, jumladan, umumiy yigʻilish qarorini “bitim” yoki “meʼyoriy hujjat” sifatida qarashlarni inkor etuvchi fikr-mulohazalar bildirilgan. Bundan tashqari, umumiy yigʻilish qarorlarini oʻz-oʻzidan haqiqiy boʻlmagan va nizoli qarorlarga boʻlish orqali ularning oʻxshash va farqli jihatlari, bu boradagi daʼvo muddatlari, ishtirokchilarning huquqlari sudlar tomonidan himoya qilinishidagi mavjud muammolar va yechimlar qiyosiy-huquqiy tahlil asosida oʻrganib chiqilib, moddiy va protsessual huquq normalarini takomillashtirish hamda Oliy sudning tegishli plenum qarorlariga oʻzgartirishlar kiritish yuzasidan takliflar berilgan. Maqolaning yana bir ahamiyatli jihati shundaki, sudlar tomonidan mazkur toifadagi koʻrilgan ishlar umumlashtirilib, umumlashtirish jarayonida aniqlangan yoʻl qoʻyilgan kamchiliklar boʻyicha Oliy sudning amaliy tajribalari bilan oʻrtoqlashilgan.
Iqtiboslar
1. Vilkin S.S. Grazhdansko-pravovaya priroda volevykh aktov kollegial’nykh organov yuridicheskogo litsa [Civil law nature of volitional acts of collegial bodies of a legal entity]. Abstract of PhD thesis. Moscow, 2009, pp. 23–30.
2. Terent’yeva N.S. K voprosu o pravovoy prirode resheniya obshchego sobraniya uchastnikov obshchestva s ogranichennoy otvetstvennost’yu v svete reformirovaniya grazhdanskogo zakonodatel’stva [To the question of the legal nature of the decision of the general meeting of participants in a limited liability company in the light of the reform of civil legislation]. Yurist – Lawyer, 2013, no. 9, p. 26.
3. Rodionova O.M. O pravovoy prirode resheniy sobraniy i ikh nedeystvitel’nosti v germanskom i rossiyskom grazhdanskom prave [On the legal nature of decisions of meetings and their invalidity in German and Russian civil law]. Vestnik grazhdanskogo prava – Bulletin of Civil Law, 2012, no. 5, pp. 68–72.
4. Lomakin D.V. Korporativnyye pravootnosheniya: obshchaya teoriya i praktika yee primeneniya v khozyaystvennykh obshchestvakh [Corporate Legal Relations: General Theory and Practice of Its Application in Business Companies]. pp. 187–190.
5. Tarasenko Yu.A. O pravovykh posledstviyakh prinyatiya nezakonnogo resheniya obshchim sobraniyem khozyaystvennogo obshchestva [On the legal consequences of making an illegal decision by the general meeting of a business company]. Vestnik VAS RF – Bulletin of the Supreme Arbitration Court of the Russian Federation, 2009, no. 5, pp. 94–97.
6. Osushchestvleniya prav uchastnika obshchestva s ogranichennoy otvetstvennost’yu v upravlenii delami obshchestva i nekotoryye voprosy sudebnoy zashchity [Exercise of the rights of a participant in a limited liability company in managing the affairs of the company and some issues of judicial protection]. Justice, Legal, scientific and practical publication, 2022.
7. Glusheskiy A.A. Kvorum obshchego sobraniya aktsionerov i kvorum po voprosu povestki dnya obshchego sobraniya aktsionerov [Quorum of the general meeting of shareholders and quorum on the agenda item of the general meeting of shareholders]. Pravo i ekonomika – Law and Economics, 2017, no. 6, part I, pp. 40–41.
8. Statistical data of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Uzbekistan for the period 2020-2021 and 9 months of 2022.
9. Nikologorskaya E.I. Uregulirovaniye korporativnykh konfliktov k aktsionernym pravootnosheniyam [Settlement of corporate conflicts to joint-stock legal relations]. Pp. 49–50.
10. Rubeko G.L. Nekotoryye aspekty obzhalovaniya resheniy obshchego sobraniya aktsionerov [Some Aspects of Appealing Decisions of the General Meeting of Shareholders]. Sovremennoye pravo – Modern Law, 2014, no. 12, pp. 75–76.
11. Grazhdansko-protsessual’noye pravo Respubliki Uzbekistan [Civil Procedural Law of the Republic of Uzbekistan]. Tashkent, Adolat Publ., 2001, p. 136.
12. Timonov M.A. Osobennosti primeneniya obespechitel’nykh mer v arbitrazhnom protsesse [Features of the application of interim measures in the arbitration process]. PhD thesis. St. Petersburg, 2006, p. 63.
13. Bundesrecht konsolidiert: Gesamte Rechtsvorschrift für Aktiengesetz [Federal Law Consolidated: Entire Stock Corporation Act Legislation]. Available at: https://www.ris.bka.gv.at/GeltendeFassung.wxe?Abfrage=Bundesnormen &Gesetzesnummer=10002070/.
14. Pravovyye posledstviya priznaniya resheniy obshchego sobraniya aktsionerov (uchastnikov) nedeystvitel’nymi [Legal Consequences of Recognizing Decisions of the General Meeting of Shareholders (Participants) as Invalid]. Available at: http://www.jbi-group.ru/media-and-event/jbi_press/pravovye-posledstviya-priznaniya-resheniy-obshchego-sobraniya-aktsionerov-uchastnikov-nedeystvitelny/.
15. Kuznetsov A.A. Osparivaniye resheniy obshchikh sobraniy uchastnikov (aktsionerov) [Challenging decisions of general meetings of participants (shareholders)]. Corporate law in anticipation of change. Collection of articles for the 20th anniversary of the LLC Law, 2020, p. 213.
16. Schäfer B. Decree. pp. 1055–1082.
17. Makovskaya A.A. Pravovyye posledstviya nedeystvitel’nosti resheniy obshchego sobraniya aktsionerov i soveta direktorov aktsionernogo obshchestva [Legal Consequences of Invalidity of Decisions of the General Meeting of Shareholders and the Board of Directors of a Joint Stock Company]. Invalidity in civil law: problems, trends, practice. Collection of articles. Rep. ed. M.A. Rozhkova. Moscow, 2006, p. 353.
18. Lomakin D.V. Ocherki teorii aktsionernogo prava i praktiki primeneniya aktsionernogo zakonodatel’stva [Essays on the theory of joint stock law and the practice of applying joint stock legislation]. Pp. 158–159.
19. Schäfer B. GmbHG [GmbHG]. Comment. 4th, revised ed. 2019, pp. 1060–1061.
