JAZO TAYINLASH UMUMIY ASOSLARINING NAZARIY TAHLILI
Kalit so‘zlar:
jazo, jazo tayinlash, ayb shakli, jazoni yеngillashtiruvchi va og‘irlashtiruvchi holatlar, qilmish, javobgarlik, prinsip, jinoyat sodir etish usuli, motivi, yеtkazilgan zarar miqdori, qilmishning xavflilik darajasi, xususiyatiAnnotatsiya
Mazkur maqolada jazo tayinlash sodir etilgan jinoyatning yakuniy bosqichi ekanligi, buni faqat mazkur jarayonda qatnashuvchi taraflarning o‘zaro farqlari bilan ajratib olish mumkinligi qayd etilgan. Shuningdek, jazo tayinlashning umumiy asoslari bilan bog‘liq masalalar qadimgi milliy olimlarimizning asarlaridan keltirilgan misollar asosida ko‘rsatilgan. Jazo tayinlash bilan bog‘liq masalalarda sodir etilgan jinoyat uchun faqatgina bitta jazo tayinlanishiga oid misollarga alohida e’tibor berilgan va jinoyat qonuni qoidalariga muvofiq har bir jinoyat faqat bitta asosiy jazoning qo‘llanishini taqozo etishi shartligi, bu masalaning o‘zgacha hal etilishi insonparvarlik va adolat prinsiplariga to‘g‘ri kelmasligi qayd etilgan. Bundan tashqari, ushbu maqolada jazo tayinlashning umumiy asoslari, unda hisobga olinadigan holatlar borasidagi xorijiy va milliy olimlarning nazariy qarashlari tahlil qilingan. Jazo tayinlashning umumiy asoslari sud tomonidan majburlov choralarini qo‘llashda hisobga olinishi lozim bo‘lgan jinoyat qonuni talablari ekanligi ta’kidlangan. Mazkur maqolada jazo tayinlashning umumiy asoslariga oid normalarni takomillashtirish zarurati mavjudligi sud amaliyoti materiallari va bugungi kunda jazo tayinlashning umumiy asoslarini nazariy jihatdan tahlil qilish va jinoyat qonuni normalarini takomillashtirishga ehtiyoj borligidan dalolat berayotganligi bayon etilgan.
Iqtiboslar
1. Muhiddinova F. Forobiyning huquqiy qarashlarida jinoyat va jazo masalalarining aks etishi [Reflection of the issues of crime and punishment in Farobiʻs legal views]. TSIL Bulletin, 2006, no. 1, p. 88.
2. Temur tuzuklari [Timurʻs rules]. Tashkent, Sharq, 2005, pp. 87–89.
3. Rustamboyev M.X., Toxirov F. Jinoyat huquqi [Criminal law]. General part. Tashkent, 2002, p. 76.
4. Usmonaliyev M. Jazo tayinlash [Punishment]. Tashkent, TSUL Publ., 2004, pp. 9–11.
5. Suyunova D.J., Akhrarov B.D. Problemy naznacheniya nakazaniya [Problems of sentencing]. Tashkent, TSIL, 2007, p. 25.
6. Jinoyat huquqi [Criminal law]. Tashkent, TSUL Publ., 2021, 111 p.
7. Skryabin M.A. Obshchiye printsipy naznacheniya nakazaniya i ikh primeneniye k nesovershennoletnim [General principles of sentencing and their application to minors]. Kazan, 1988, p. 14.
8. Duyunov V.K. et al. Kommentariy k Ugolovnomu kodeksu Rossiyskoy Federatsii (postateynyy) [Commentary on the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation (article by article)]. Ed. L.L. Kruglikov. Moscow, Wolters Kluver, 2005, p. 52.
9. Kommentariy k Ugolovnomu kodeksu Rossiyskoy Federatsii [Commentary on the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation]. 2nd ed., revised. and added. Ed. A.I. Rarog. Moscow, TK Velby, Prospekt Publ., 2004, p. 53.
10. Pechnikov N.P., Chernyshov V.N. Ugolovnoye pravo [Criminal law]. Tambov, Tambov State Technical University Publ., 2006, pp. 30–31.
11. Bazhanov M.I. Naznacheniye nakazaniya po sovetskomu ugolovnomu pravu [Appointment of punishment under Soviet criminal law]. Kiev, 1980, pp. 23–24.
12. Gaverov G.S. Obshchiye nachala naznacheniya nakazaniya po sovetskomu ugolovnomu pravu [General principles of sentencing in Soviet criminal law]. Irkutsk, 1976, p. 7.
13. Veliyev S.A. Printsipy naznacheniya nakazaniya [Principles of sentencing]. Moscow, 2017, p. 382.
14. Rozimova Q. Some features of improving the penal institution for several crimes in the criminal law of Uzbekistan in the fight against corruption. Journal of Adv. Research in Dynamical & Control, 2020, vol. 12, iss. 02. DOI: 10.5373/JARDCS/V12SP2/SP20201071/.
15. Rozimova Q. Jazo tayinlash [Punishment]. Tashkent, TSUL, 2022, 104 p.
