O‘ZBEKISTON RESPUBLIKASIDA STARTAPLAR FAOLIYATINI HUQUQIY TARTIBGA SOLISHNI TAKOMILLASHTIRISHNING ASOSIY YO‘NALISHLARI
Kalit so‘zlar:
startap, innovatsiya, innovatsion faoliyat, startap ekotizimi, intellektual mulk, moliyalashtirish, startap va investor o‘rtasidagi shartnoma, korporativ shartnomalar, investitsion platformalarAnnotatsiya
Jahon amaliyotida innovatsiyalar iqtisodiy o‘sishni harakatlantiruvchi asosiy kuch sifatida e’tirof etiladigan hamda barqaror rivojlanish uchun shart-sharoitlar yaratadigan, turli-tuman muammolarni yechishga qodir bo‘lgan muhim omildir. Bugungi kunda yuridik fanga innovatsiya va innovatsion investitsiya shakllari hamda turlariga doir yangi tushunchalar kirib kelishda davom etmoqda. Zamonaviy innovatsion g‘oyalar, ishlanmalar va texnologiyalarga asoslangan startaplar, venchur loyihalar kabi innovatsion tushunchalar bunga yaqqol misoldir. Mazkur maqolada mamlakatimizda startaplar faoliyatini huquqiy tartibga solishni takomillashtirishning asosiy yo‘nalishlari sanab chiqilgan hamda ular xorijiy mamlakatlar tajribasi asosida tahlil qilingan. Xususan, maqolada innovatsion siyosatni amalga oshirishda startaplar mavqeyini belgilash, intellektual mulk natijalari huquqiy muhofazasini yanada optimallashtirish, startaplar faoliyatida shartnomaoldi muzokara institutini takomillashtirish, startaplar faoliyatini davlat tomonidan qo‘llab-quvvatlash tizimini yaxshilash kabi yo‘nalishlarda qonunchilik bazasini takomillashtirish lozimligi qayd etilgan. Shuningdek, startaplar mavqeyini alohida qonun bilan belgilash, davlat tomonidan moliyalashtiriladigan startap natijalariga bo‘lgan huquqni davlat va loyiha egasi o‘rtasida taqsimlashga oid qonunchilikdagi normalarni takomillashtirish, venchur investor va startap o‘rtasida tuziladigan shartnomaoldi kelishuvlarni ishlab chiqish hamda startaplarga davlat tomonidan turli imtiyozlar taqdim etish kabi masalalar ilmiy-huquqiy tomondan asoslab berilgan.
Iqtiboslar
1. O‘zbekiston startap ekotizimi tahlili [Analysis of the startup ecosystem of Uzbekistan]. Startup Indicator Uzbekistan. 2020, 19 p.
2. Tojiboev A., Sharakhmetova U., Tojjiboyev S. Between public and private-state entity as a party to international commercial arbitration: Lessons for the Republic of Uzbekistan. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation (EDN PVOVRU), 2020, vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 581–591. DOI: 10.37200/IJPR/V24I6/PR260062.
3. Zafarovich T.S. Different Approaches in Enforcement of Arbitral Award Annulled at the Place of Arbitration. Miasto Przyszłości – City of Tomorrow, 2022, vol. 25, pp. 320-323. Available at: http://miastoprzyszlosci.com.pl/index.php/mp/article/view/385/.
4. Ibrohimov A.A.O., Koryogdiyev B.U.O., Tojiboyev S.Z. Korporativ niqoblarni olib tashlash konsepsiyasi va uni O‘zbekiston korporativ huquqida takomillashtirish masalalari [The concept of removing corporate masks and issues of its improvement in corporate law]. Oriental Renaissance: Innovative, Educational, Natural and Social Sciences, 2022, vol. 2 (1), pp. 1068-1082. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/korporativ-niqoblarni-olib-tashlash-konsepsiyasi-va-uni-o-zbekiston-korporativ-huquqida-takomillashtirish-masalalari/. DOI: 10.24412/2181-1784-2022-1-1068-1082/.
5. Tojiboyev А. The role of stabilization clause in investment contract. Review of Law Sciences, 2018, no. 2, pp. 37–41, EDN WRUUXO. Available at: https://www.elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_44347285_13645760.pdf/.
6. Tojiboyev А.Z.U. Deyatelnost’ startapov kak ob’’yekt grazhdanskogo prava [Activities of start-ups as an object of civil law]. Review of Law Sciences, 2020, no. 01, pp. 79–87. DOI: 10.34920 ‘rls. 1.2020.79-87/.
7. Tojiboyev А. Primeneniye nekotorykh startap-kontraktov i ego vazhnost’ v usloviyakh onlayn-rezhima [The application of some start-up contracts and its importance in online conditions]. Review of Law Sciences, 2020, no. 2, pp. 119–123. DOI: 10.24412/2181-1148-2020-2-119-123/.
8. Oqyulov O. Innovatsiya rivojlanishini ta’minlashda intellektual mulk huquqi institutlari ta’siri samaradorligini oshirish masalalari [Issues of increasing the effectiveness of the influence of intellectual property law institutions in ensuring the development of innovation]. Tashkent, Turon Zamin Ziya Publ., 2016, 300 p.
9. Imomov N.F. Intellektual mulkning yangi obyektlari [New objects of intellectual property]. Tashkent, 2011.
10. Gulyamov S.S. Voprosy grazhdansko-pravovogo regulirovaniya innovatsionnoy deyatel’nosti [Issues of civil law regulation of innovation activities]. Review of the Legislation of Uzbekistan, Tashkent, 2011, no. 1-2, p. 5.
11. About innovative activity. Law of Ukraine, dated 2002, July 4, No. 40-IV. Available at: http://base.spinform.ru/show_doc.fwx?rgn=9542/.
12. National Legal Internet Portal of the Republic of Belarus. Available at: https://www.pravo.by/document/?guid=3871&p0/.
13. Paragraph. Information system. Kazakhstan. Available at: https://online.zakon.kz/document/?doc_id=300499/.
14. Official Journal of the French Republic (JORF). Available at: https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/.
15. Leshakova N.P. State regulation of innovative development of the Republic of Korea. Russian Journal of Innovation Economics, 2017, vol. 7 (2), pp. 161–174.
16. Toshpo‘latova L.H. Davlat budjeti mablag‘lari hisobidan yaratilgan sanoat mulki obyektlarining huquqi maqomi [Legal status of industrial property objects created at the expense of state budget funds]. PhD thesis. Tashkent, TSUL, 2008.
17. Vapaeva G.S. Iqtisodiyotni innovatsion rivojlantirish – moliyaviy inqirozdan chiqishning samarali vositasi sifatida [Innovative development of the economy as an effective means of getting out of the financial crisis]. Intellektual mulk huquqi: rivojlantirish istiqbollari Intellectual property rights: prospects for development. Tashkent, Justice Publ., 2012, 108 p.
18. Kozyrev A.N. Razvitiye zakonodatel‘stva ob intellektual‘noy sobstvennosti [Development of intellectual property legislation]. Available at: http/www.akdi.ru/pravo/iam/1/htm#4/.
19. Stevenson–Wydler. Technology Innovation Act of 1980: Public Law 96–480 of October 21, 1980. Industrial Property, 1980, no. 7/8, p. 2.
20. Mehmonov Q. Mualliflik huquqiga ko‘ra kompyuter dasturlari yaratuvchilarining mulkiy va shaxsiy nomulkiy huquqlari [Property and personal non-property rights of creators of computer programs according to copyright]. Intellectual property protection – the guarantee of spiritual development. Proceedings of the scientific-theoretical seminar, Tashkent, 2010, p. 49.
21. Cervantes M. Academic Patenting: How universities and public research organizations are using their intellectual property to boost research and spur innovative start-ups. Available at: http/www.wipo.imt/sme/en/documents/.
22. Pannebakker Ye. Letter of Intent in International Contracting. 2016, p. 21.
23. Yankovskiy R.M. Zakon startapa [Startup law]. Startap, pp. 117–122. ISBN 978-5-9904334-0-3122/
24. Sidorenko D. Zashchita startapov: vazhnost‘ i osobennosti [Startup protection: importance and features]. Available at: https://sk.ua/.
25. Mikhal‘skaya N. Pis‘mo o namereniyakh: v teorii i praktike [Letter of intent: in theory and practice]. Part 1. Theory of letter of intent. Available at: https://zakon.ru/.
26. Civil Code of the Russian Federation (CC RF). Available at: http://base.garant.ru/10164072/.
27. Xudaynazarov A. Sostoyaniye sistemy organizatsionnoy podderzhki i finansirovaniya startapov v Respublike Uzbekistan: problemy, ikh prichiny i resheniya [The state of the system of organizational support and financing of start-ups in the Republic of Uzbekistan: problems, their causes and solutions]. Tashkent, 2019, 6 p.
28. Halt G.B. Jr. et al. Intellectual Property and Financing Strategies for Technology Startups. Springer International Publishing AG, 2017, pp. 14–15. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-49217-9_3/.
29. KONEX. Securities exchange exclusively for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) and venture companies prior to listing on KOSDAQ. Available at: http://koreanlii.or.kr/w/index.php/KONEX/.
30. Tojiboyev S.Z. Taxation policy of host state in investor-state dispute settlement. Oriental Renaissance: Innovative, Educational, Natural and Social Sciences, 2022, vol. 2 (8), pp. 232–238. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/taxation-policy-of-host-state-in-investor-state-dispute-settlement/.
31. Tojiboyev S.Z. The prospect of tobacco control regime in Uzbekistan in light of potential dispute under the UK-Uzbekistan bit. International Conferences, 2022, August, vol. 1, no. 7, pp. 46–51. Available at: http://erus.uz/index.php/cf/article/view/243/.
32. Statista.com platform. Available at: https://www.statista.com/outlook/335/100/.
