JINOYAT ISHI QO‘ZG‘ATISHNI RAD ETISH YOKI TUGATISHDA SHAXSLARNING HUQUQ VA MANFAATLARINI HIMOYA QILISHNING AYRIM JIHATLARI
Kalit so‘zlar:
ish yuritishni rad etish, jinoyat ishini tugatish, statistik kartochkalar, sud, moddiy zarar, protsessual xarajatlarAnnotatsiya
Ushbu maqolada bugungi kunda javobgarlikdan ozod etishning protsessual tartibi – ish yuritishni rad etish va tugatish qarorlari ustidan shikoyat qilishda vujudga kelayotgan muammolar va mazkur masalalarning huquqiy tartibga solish jihatlari, qaror ustidan sudga murojaat qilish huquqining afzalliklari tadqiq etilgan. Maqolada mazkur qarorlar ustidan shikoyat qilishning protsessual tartibi yuzasidan amaliyot tahlili, mavjud muammolar va ularning yechimiga oid yetakchi ilmiy tashkilotlarning xulosalari tahlil qilingan. Shuningdek, ish yuritishni rad etish va tugatish qarorlarini qayd etish, ularning huquqiy oqibatlari bo‘yicha salbiy holatlar o‘rganilgan hamda statistik hisoblar va mazkur institut bilan bog‘liq boshqa muammolar ko‘rib chiqilgan. Shu bilan birga, maqolada jinoyat ishini qo‘zg‘atishni rad etish va tugatishda protsessual xarajatlar hamda mazkur qarorlarni rasmiylashtirishda mavjud huquqiy bo‘shliq va kollizion holatlar yuzasidan fikrlar bildirilgan. Tadqiqot ishida ilg‘or xorijiy tajriba, ilmiy-nazariy qarashlar, tergov hamda sud amaliyoti o‘rganilgan. Buning natijasi o‘laroq, O‘zbekiston Respublikasi Jinoyat-protsessual kodeksi va boshqa qonun hamda qonunosti hujjatlariga tegishli o‘zgartirish va qo‘shimchalar kiritish bo‘yicha taklif va tavsiyalar ishlab chiqilgan.
Iqtiboslar
1. Tursunboyev T. Ishlamaydigan qonunlar bilan adolatli jamiyat qurib bo‘lmaydi yoxud advokatlarga oson emasligi haqida uzun hikoya [A fair society cannot be built with broken laws, a long story about lawyers having a hard time]. Available at: https://kun.uz/news/2022/03/26/.
2. Kolomeec E.V. Soglasovaniye prokurorom processual’nykh resheniy organov rassledovaniya o prekrashchenii ugolovnykh del [Approval by the prosecutor of the procedural decisions of the investigation bodies on the termination of criminal cases]. Vestnik of Omsk University. Law Series, 2018, no. 3 (56), pp. 186–189. DOI: 10.25513/1990-5173.2018.3.186-189/.
3. Tabolina K.A. Nadzor prokurora za vozbuzhdeniyem i rassledovaniyem ugolovnykh del [Supervision of the prosecutor over the initiation and investigation of criminal cases]. PhD thesis. Moscow, 2016, pp. 229–230.
4. Astanov I.R. General characteristics and problems of expertise in a criminal trial in Uzbekistan. International Journal of Advanced Research, 2016, vol. 4, iss. 1-8, pp. 1–8.
5. Lee S.W. The politics of prosecution service reform in new presidential democracies: The South Korea and Russia cases in comparative perspective. Journal of Eurasian Studies, 2016, vol. 7 (2), 2016, pp. 141–150. DOI: 10.1016/j.euras.2015.09.001/.
6. Zila J. The Prosecution Service Function within the Swedish Criminal Justice System. Coping with Overloaded Criminal Justice Systems, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. 2006. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-33963-2_9/.
7. Bykov V.M. Pravovoye polozheniye prokurora na dosudebnykh stadiyakh ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva [The legal position of the prosecutor at the pre-trial stages of criminal proceedings]. Rossijskaja justicija – Russian Justice, 2016, no. 11, pp. 30–34.
8. Michael McKevitt v. DPP, Supreme Court. Michael McKevitt v. DPP, Unreported, Supreme Court, 2003, March 18, 122 p.
9. Ross J.E., Thaman S.C. Comparative criminal procedure. Edward Elgar Publ., 2016, 576 p.
10. Haydarov A.A., Didenko N.S. Prinyatiye sudom protsessual’nogo resheniya ob otkaze v udovletvorenii hodataystva sledovatelya o prekrashchenii ugolovnogo dela (ugolovnogo presledovaniya) [Adoption by the court of a procedural decision on refusal to satisfy the investigator’s petition to terminate the criminal case (criminal prosecution)]. Criminal Procedural Law and Criminalistics, 2018.
11. Saidov B.A. Ishni sudga qadar yuritishda shaxsning konstitutsiyaviy huquq va erkinliklari ta’minlanishini takomillashtirish [Improving the provision of constitutional rights and freedoms of a person in the proceedings before the court]. Abstract of Doctor’s degree dissertation. Tashkent, 2020, pp. 7–8.
12. Constitution of the Republic of Uzbekistan. Tashkent, Adolat Publ., 1992.
13. The Criminal Procedural Code of the Russian Federation. 2001, December 18. Available at: http://pravo.gov.ru/proxy/ips/?docbody=&nd=102073942/.
14. Criminal Procedural Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan, with amendments and additions as of 09.07.2022. Available at: https://online.zakon.kz/document/?doc_id=31575852&sub_id=0&pos=4;-111#pos=4;-111/.
15. Criminal Procedural Code of the Republic of Moldova. 2003, March 14, No. 122-XV. Available at: https://continent-online.com/Document/?doc_id=30397729#pos=6;-142/.
16. Criminal Procedural Code of the Republic of Armenia. 1998, September 1, No. ZR-248.
17. Criminal Procedural Code of the Republic of Azerbaijan. Approved by the Law of the Republic of Azerbaijan No. 907-IQ dated July 14, 2000. Article 39.
18. Criminal Procedure Act. No. 689/1997, amendments up to 733/2015 included. Ministry of Justice, Finland. Available at: https://www.finlex.fi/en/laki/kaannokset/1997/en19970689.pdf/.
19. Ministry of internal affairs of the Republic of Uzbekistan, General Prosecutor’s Office, State Security Service, State Customs Committee, National Guard, Supreme Court of the Republic of Uzbekistan dated November 15, 2021, No. 70, No. 71, 30, 01-02/22-56, 34, 16/1020-21-Appendix 1 to the decision of the number regulation on the procedure for maintaining a unified Information System “ Electronic criminal law statistics.
20. Murodov B.B. Jinoyat ishini tugatish: nazariya va amaliyot [Termination of a criminal case: theory and practice]. Tashkent, 2015, pp. 99–100.
21. Tarasov I.S. Prekrashcheniye ugolovnogo dela i ugolovnogo presledovaniya po nereabilitiruyushchim osnovaniyam [Termination of the criminal case and criminal prosecution on non-rehabilitating grounds]. PhD thesis. Nizhny Novgorod, Nizhny Novgorod Academy of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia, 2007, p. 12.
22. Sinzhov D.V. Prekrashcheniye ugolovnykh del po nereabilitiruyushchim osnovaniyam na predvaritel’nom sledstvii [Termination of criminal cases on non-rehabilitating grounds at the preliminary investigation]. Abstract of PhD thesis. Almaty, 2003, p. 11.
23. Saitbayev T.R., Zokirov B.E. Jabrlanuvchi va guvohlarni himoya qilishning huquqiy va tashkiliy muammolari [Legal and organizational problems of victim and witness protection]. Huquq – Law, 2000, no. 2, pp. 51–52.
24. Astanova L.A. Teoreticheskiye osnovy okhrany prav lichnosti v ugolovnom protsesse i ikh realizatsiya v pravoprimenitel’noy deyatel’nosti [Theoretical foundations of the protection of individual rights in criminal proceedings and their implementation in law enforcement activities]. Tashkent, 1997, pp. 93–94.
