SOME ASPECTS OF PROTECTING THE RIGHTS AND INTERESTS OF PERSONS IN CASE OF REFUSAL TO INITIATE OR TERMINATE A CRIMINAL CASE
Keywords:
refusal to initiate a case, termination of a criminal case, statistical cards, court, material damage, procedural costsAbstract
This article discusses the procedural system for exoneration from liability today – the problems that arise when filing a complaint against the decision to refuse and terminate proceedings in the case, as well as aspects of legal regulation of these issues, the advantages of the right to appeal the decision in court. The article provides an analysis of the practice of the procedural system for appealing these decisions and analyzes the existing problems and conclusions of leading scientific organizations on their solution. The article also studied negative cases of refusal and termination of proceedings, their legal consequences, as well as studied statistical calculations and other problems associated with this institution. At the same time, the article expressed opinions on the procedural costs of refusing and terminating the initiation of a criminal case, as well as on the existing legal loopholes and circumstances of collusion in the execution of these decisions. During the research work, advanced foreign experience, scientific and theoretical views, and investigative and judicial practice were studied, as a result of which proposals and recommendations were developed for making appropriate amendments and additions to the Criminal Procedural Code of the Republic of Uzbekistan and other legislative acts.
References
1. Tursunboyev T. Ishlamaydigan qonunlar bilan adolatli jamiyat qurib bo‘lmaydi yoxud advokatlarga oson emasligi haqida uzun hikoya [A fair society cannot be built with broken laws, a long story about lawyers having a hard time]. Available at: https://kun.uz/news/2022/03/26/.
2. Kolomeec E.V. Soglasovaniye prokurorom processual’nykh resheniy organov rassledovaniya o prekrashchenii ugolovnykh del [Approval by the prosecutor of the procedural decisions of the investigation bodies on the termination of criminal cases]. Vestnik of Omsk University. Law Series, 2018, no. 3 (56), pp. 186–189. DOI: 10.25513/1990-5173.2018.3.186-189/.
3. Tabolina K.A. Nadzor prokurora za vozbuzhdeniyem i rassledovaniyem ugolovnykh del [Supervision of the prosecutor over the initiation and investigation of criminal cases]. PhD thesis. Moscow, 2016, pp. 229–230.
4. Astanov I.R. General characteristics and problems of expertise in a criminal trial in Uzbekistan. International Journal of Advanced Research, 2016, vol. 4, iss. 1-8, pp. 1–8.
5. Lee S.W. The politics of prosecution service reform in new presidential democracies: The South Korea and Russia cases in comparative perspective. Journal of Eurasian Studies, 2016, vol. 7 (2), 2016, pp. 141–150. DOI: 10.1016/j.euras.2015.09.001/.
6. Zila J. The Prosecution Service Function within the Swedish Criminal Justice System. Coping with Overloaded Criminal Justice Systems, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. 2006. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-33963-2_9/.
7. Bykov V.M. Pravovoye polozheniye prokurora na dosudebnykh stadiyakh ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva [The legal position of the prosecutor at the pre-trial stages of criminal proceedings]. Rossijskaja justicija – Russian Justice, 2016, no. 11, pp. 30–34.
8. Michael McKevitt v. DPP, Supreme Court. Michael McKevitt v. DPP, Unreported, Supreme Court, 2003, March 18, 122 p.
9. Ross J.E., Thaman S.C. Comparative criminal procedure. Edward Elgar Publ., 2016, 576 p.
10. Haydarov A.A., Didenko N.S. Prinyatiye sudom protsessual’nogo resheniya ob otkaze v udovletvorenii hodataystva sledovatelya o prekrashchenii ugolovnogo dela (ugolovnogo presledovaniya) [Adoption by the court of a procedural decision on refusal to satisfy the investigator’s petition to terminate the criminal case (criminal prosecution)]. Criminal Procedural Law and Criminalistics, 2018.
11. Saidov B.A. Ishni sudga qadar yuritishda shaxsning konstitutsiyaviy huquq va erkinliklari ta’minlanishini takomillashtirish [Improving the provision of constitutional rights and freedoms of a person in the proceedings before the court]. Abstract of Doctor’s degree dissertation. Tashkent, 2020, pp. 7–8.
12. Constitution of the Republic of Uzbekistan. Tashkent, Adolat Publ., 1992.
13. The Criminal Procedural Code of the Russian Federation. 2001, December 18. Available at: http://pravo.gov.ru/proxy/ips/?docbody=&nd=102073942/.
14. Criminal Procedural Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan, with amendments and additions as of 09.07.2022. Available at: https://online.zakon.kz/document/?doc_id=31575852&sub_id=0&pos=4;-111#pos=4;-111/.
15. Criminal Procedural Code of the Republic of Moldova. 2003, March 14, No. 122-XV. Available at: https://continent-online.com/Document/?doc_id=30397729#pos=6;-142/.
16. Criminal Procedural Code of the Republic of Armenia. 1998, September 1, No. ZR-248.
17. Criminal Procedural Code of the Republic of Azerbaijan. Approved by the Law of the Republic of Azerbaijan No. 907-IQ dated July 14, 2000. Article 39.
18. Criminal Procedure Act. No. 689/1997, amendments up to 733/2015 included. Ministry of Justice, Finland. Available at: https://www.finlex.fi/en/laki/kaannokset/1997/en19970689.pdf/.
19. Ministry of internal affairs of the Republic of Uzbekistan, General Prosecutor’s Office, State Security Service, State Customs Committee, National Guard, Supreme Court of the Republic of Uzbekistan dated November 15, 2021, No. 70, No. 71, 30, 01-02/22-56, 34, 16/1020-21-Appendix 1 to the decision of the number regulation on the procedure for maintaining a unified Information System “ Electronic criminal law statistics.
20. Murodov B.B. Jinoyat ishini tugatish: nazariya va amaliyot [Termination of a criminal case: theory and practice]. Tashkent, 2015, pp. 99–100.
21. Tarasov I.S. Prekrashcheniye ugolovnogo dela i ugolovnogo presledovaniya po nereabilitiruyushchim osnovaniyam [Termination of the criminal case and criminal prosecution on non-rehabilitating grounds]. PhD thesis. Nizhny Novgorod, Nizhny Novgorod Academy of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia, 2007, p. 12.
22. Sinzhov D.V. Prekrashcheniye ugolovnykh del po nereabilitiruyushchim osnovaniyam na predvaritel’nom sledstvii [Termination of criminal cases on non-rehabilitating grounds at the preliminary investigation]. Abstract of PhD thesis. Almaty, 2003, p. 11.
23. Saitbayev T.R., Zokirov B.E. Jabrlanuvchi va guvohlarni himoya qilishning huquqiy va tashkiliy muammolari [Legal and organizational problems of victim and witness protection]. Huquq – Law, 2000, no. 2, pp. 51–52.
24. Astanova L.A. Teoreticheskiye osnovy okhrany prav lichnosti v ugolovnom protsesse i ikh realizatsiya v pravoprimenitel’noy deyatel’nosti [Theoretical foundations of the protection of individual rights in criminal proceedings and their implementation in law enforcement activities]. Tashkent, 1997, pp. 93–94.
