OʻZBEKISTONDA SUD PRETSEDENTI: HUQUQIY ANIQLIK VA STARE DECISIS DOKTRINASI
Kalit so‘zlar:
anglo-sakson, huquq manbasi, pretsedent, sud pretsedenti, romano-german, stare decisis doktrinasiAnnotatsiya
Ushbu maqolada Oʻzbekiston sharoitida sud pretsedentini qoʻllash istiqbollari muhokama qilingan. Anglo-sakson va romano-german huquq oilalariga mansub xorijiy huquq tizimlari misolida qiyosiy tahlil va tadqiqot ishlari olib borilgan. Oʻzbekiston Respublikasida “yozma huquq” tizimi amal qiladi hamda Buyuk Britaniya va AQSh huquqiy tizimlaridan farqli ravishda, bu sud pretsedenti tizimi huquqiy ahamiyatga ega emas, yaʼni maʼlum bir ish boʻyicha qabul qilingan sud qarori boshqa xuddi shunday ish boʻyicha huquqiy ahamiyatga ega boʻlmaydi. Shu sababli maqolada sud pretsedenti doktrinalari tahlil qilinib, romano-german huquq oilasiga mansub boʻlgan Oʻzbekiston huquq tizimiga sud pretsedentini qaysi huquq doktrinasi asosida kiritish mumkinligi bayon qilingan. O‘zbekiston kabi romano-german huquq oilasiga kiruvchi Germaniya va Rossiyada ham sud pretsedenti qonun emas, balki qonundan keyin turuvchi normativ-huquqiy tusga ega boʻlmagan huquq manbasi hisoblanadi. Shu tufayli uni respublikamizda amalga oshirishning huquqiy mexanizmlari yuzasidan taklif va tavsiyalar bildirilgan.
Iqtiboslar
1. Karimov A. Sud pretsedenti anglo-sakson huquq oilasiga kiruvchi davlatlar qonunchiligining ajralmas qismi boʻlsa-da, romano-german huquqiy tizimiga kiruvchi bir qator davlatlar uchun ham begona emas [Although judicial precedent is an integral part of the legislation of countries belonging to the Anglo-Saxon legal family, it is not alien to a number of countries belonging to the Romano-Germanic legal system.]. “Milliy qonunchilikda sud pretsedenti instituti elementlarini joriy etish: zarurat, amaliyot va xorijiy tajriba” davra suhbati materiallari – Materials of the roundtable discussion “Introduction of the elements of the institution of judicial precedent in the national legislation: necessity, practice and foreign experience”. Tashkent, 2022, p. 20.
2. Catlett F.W. The Development of the Doctrine of Stare Decisis and the Extent to Which It Should Be Applied, 21 Wash. L. Rev. & St. B.J, 1946, p. 158. Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.uw.edu/wlr/vol21/iss3/2
3. Muhammadiyev A.A. Fuqarolik huquqi tamoyillarining nazariy va amaliy muammolari [Theoretical and practical problems of the principles of civil law]. Tashkent, TSIL Publ, 2010, p. 258.
4. Hardisty J. Reflections On Stare Decisis, Indiana Law Journal, 1979, vol. 55, iss. 1, article 3. Available at: http://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/ilj/vol55/iss1/3
5. Toshev B.N. Milliy huquq tizimini rivojlantirishda huquqiy qarashlar va yuridik fanning oʻrni. Yuridik fan va huquqni qoʻllash amaliyotining dolzarb muammolari [The role of legal views and legal science in the development of the national legal system. Actual problems of legal science and law enforcement practice]. Proceedings of the scientific-practical conference, 2020, vol. 1, Tashkent, Lesson press Publ., pp. 42–48.
6. Gushchina N., Glukhoedov M. Judicial precedent in Russian legal system: history, theory and practice. Modern law 2, pp. 79–85.
7. Stainer p., König D. The Concept of Stare Decisis in the German Legal System – a Systematically Inconsistent Concept with High Factual Importance. Studia Iuridica Lublinensia, 2018, vol. XXVII, no. 1, pp. 121–130. Available at: Pobrane z czasopisma Studia Iuridica Lublinensia http://studiaiuridica.umcs.pl
8. Civitarese S. A European convergence towards a stare decisis model? Revista Digital de Derecho Administrativo, 2015, no. 14, pp. 173–194. Available at: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=503856210009
9. Bodrov S.Y. A judicial precedent in the system of sources of Russian law: theory and practice. Abstract of PhD thesis. Ulyanovsk, SEIHPO “Ulyanovsk State University”. 2004, 208 p.
10. Lewis S. Precedent and the Rule of Law Author Notes. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 2021, vol. 41, issue 4, pp. 873–898, Doi: 10.1093/ojls/gqab007
11. Lash K.T, Originalism, Popular Sovereignty and Reverse Stare Decisis. 93 Va. L. Rev. 1437, 2007, pp. 1438–1471
12. For a more in-depth analysis cf. P. Lassahn, Rechtsprechung und Parlamentsgesetz, Mohr Siebeck. 2017, p. 18, 33,
13. Solanki S. What is stare decisis in simple terms? Available at: https://legal.thomsonreuters.com/blog/the-doctrine-of-stare-decisis/
14. Oʻzbekiston Respublikasining Soliq kodeksi [Tax Code of the Republic of Uzbekistan]. Tashkent, Yuridik adabiyotlar Publ., 2022.
15. Kurt T. Lash, The Cost of Judicial Error: Stare Decisis and the Role of Normative Theory. 89 Notre Dame L. Rev. 2014, no. 5, pp. 2189–2218.
