MAHALLIY DAVLAT HOKIMIYATI BOSHQARUV ORGANLARI FAOLIYATI SAMARADORLIGINI BAHOLASHNING O‘ZIGA XOS XUSUSIYATLARI
Kalit so‘zlar:
mahalliy davlat boshqaruv organlari, samaradorlik, faoliyat, omillar, baholash, mezonAnnotatsiya
Ushbu maqolada mahalliy davlat hokimiyati boshqaruv organlari faoliyati va uning samaradorligini baholashning nazariy jihatlari tahlil qilingan. Maqolada hokimiyat organlari faoliyati samaradorligini belgilovchi omillar ularning turlari huquqiy nazariyalar olimlarning fikrlari asosida keltirib o‘tilgan. Bundan tashqari, maqolada bir nechta xorijiy davlatlarning huquq nazariyasi va qonunchiligi asosida davlat hokimiyati boshqaruv organlarining samarali faoliyatiga ta’sir ko‘rsatuvchi omillar ham keltirib o‘tilgan va respublikamiz qonunchiligi bilan o‘zaro tahliliy solishtirilgan. Shu bilan birga, davlat hokimiyati boshqaruv organlari faoliyati samaradorligini baholash bo‘yicha muallifning tegishli takliflari keltirilgan. Albatta, davlat hokimiyatining milliy miqyosdagi bunday tuzilmasi bilan mamlakatda boshlangan islohotlarni keng miqyosda amalga oshirish mumkin emas edi. Shundan kelib chiqib, davlatchilikning jahon tajribasiga tayanib, davlat hokimiyati organlari mustaqil bo‘lishi, mahalliy o‘zini o‘zi boshqarish vakillik organlari tizimida esa jahon davlat amaliyotida sinovdan o‘tgan hokimiyatlar bo‘linishi tamoyilini qo‘llash lozimligi to‘g‘risida to‘g‘ri xulosa chiqarildi. Boshqacha aytganda, davlat hokimiyatining vakillik, ijro etuvchi va sud organlari hokimiyatning bo‘linishi prinsipi asosida tashkil etildi.
Iqtiboslar
1. Mirziyoev Sh. My reshitel’no prodolzhim nash put’ natsional’nogo razvitiya i podnimem yego na novyy uroven’ [We will resolutely continue our path of national development and take it to a new level]. T.: Uzbekistan, 2017. S. 161.
2. Ŭzbekiston SSR Oliy Sovetning Vedomstlari [Vedomsts of the Supreme Soviet of the Uzbek SSR]. no. 26-28, 1989, art. 448.
3. Khusanov O.T. Nezavisimost’ i mestnoye samoupravleniye [Independence and local government]. T.: Shark, 1996, r. 139.
4. Ismailova G.S. Gosudarstvenno-pravovyye napravleniya liberalizatsii mestnogo upravleniya i samoupravleniya v Uzbekistane: Dissertatsiya na soiskaniye uchenoy stepeni doktora nauk.[State-legal directions of liberalization of local government and self-government in Uzbekistan: Dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Science]. T., 2016.
5. Lomaksova Ye. Gubernator beret na sebya otvetstvennost’ [Governor takes charge]. Gazeta «Khalg sozy». 10 dekabrya 1991 g.
6. Ukaz Prezidenta Respubliki Uzbekistan «Ob utverzhdenii Kontseptsii administrativnoy reformy v Respublike Uzbekistan» [Decree of the President of the Republic of Uzbekistan “On approval of the Concept of administrative reform in the Republic of Uzbekistan]. SZ RUz, 2017, № 37, st. 979.
7. Ukaz Prezidenta Respubliki Uzbekistan ot 8 sentyabrya 2017 goda № 5185 «Ob utverzhdenii Kontseptsii administrativnoy reformy v Respublike Uzbekistan» [On approval of the Concept of administrative reform in the Republic of Uzbekistan]. Sobraniye zakonodatel’stva Respubliki Uzbekistan, 2017, № 37, Stat’ya 979.
8. Gimayev Z. Analiz podkhodov k ponyatiyu «effektivnost’» v sotsiologii, ekonomike i tekhnicheskikh naukakh [Analysis of approaches to the concept of “efficiency” in sociology, economics and technical sciences]. Vestnik Bashkirskogo universiteta. 2010. T. 15. №1. S.145.
9. Annotirovannyy slovar’ uzbekskogo yazyka [Annotated dictionary of the Uzbek language]. T.: “National Encyclopedia of Uzbekistan, GNIZ. 2006. S. 434-435.
10. Sukharev O.S. Teoriya effektivnosti ekonomiki [Theory of economic efficiency]. M., Finansy i statistika, 2009, p. 369.
11. Duran T. V., Kostin V. A. K voprosu o ponyatii «effektivnost’» v protsesse upravleniya [To the question of the concept of «efficiency» in the management process]. Nauchnyy vestnik Ural’skoy akademii gosudarstvennoy sluzhby: politologiya, ekonomika, sotsiologiya, pravo. 2011, no. 15, pp. 138-143.
12. Rayzberg B. A., Lozovskiy L. SH., Starodubtseva Ye. B. Sovremennyy ekonomicheskiy slovar’ [Modern Economic Dictionary]. M., INFRA-M, 2007. S. 495.
13. Ivannikov I.A. Gosudarstvennaya vlast’ v Rossii: problemy gumanizatsii [State power in Russia: problems of humanization]. Rostov-na-Donu: Rostov. universitet, 2006. 240 s.
14. Achkasov V.A., Gryzlov B. V. Institutsional’naya effektivnost’ gosudarstva i protsessy demokratizatsii: problemy teorii. Mir filosofii – mir cheloveka: prilozheniye k zhurnalu «Filosofskiye nauki» [Institutional efficiency of the state and democratization processes: problems of theory. The world of philosophy - the world of man: an appendix to the journal «Philosophical Sciences»]. sb. statey VII Vserossiyskogo nauchno-prosvetitel’skogo foruma «Dni Peterburgskoy filosofii – 2006». M.: Gumanitariy, 2007. S. 731-745.
15. Otsenka reguliruyushchego vozdeystviya – eto metod izucheniya, polucheniya v dostatochnoy mere dostovernoy informatsii o vozmozhnykh posledstviyakh, predpolagayemykh (vstupivshikh v silu) pravovykh aktov, predpolagayushchiy ikh sravnitel’nuyu otsenku [Regulatory impact assessment is a method of studying, obtaining sufficiently reliable information about the possible consequences of expected (entered into force) legal acts, involving their comparative assessment].studwood.ru/.
16. Protsess opredeleniya problem i tseley regulirovaniya [The process of identifying problems and goals of regulation]. www.conseil-etat.fr/.
