YURIDIK SHAXSLARNING KORRUPSIYAGA OID JINOYATLARI UCHUN JINOIY JAZOLAR PENALIZATSIYASINING BA’ZI JIHATLARI
Kalit so‘zlar:
korrupsiya jinoyatlari, jazolash, yuridik shaxslarning jinoiy javobgarligi, jazo, jarima, musodara, muayyan huquqni cheklash, majburiy tugatishAnnotatsiya
Ushbu maqola korrupsiya jinoyatlarini sodir etganlik uchun yuridik shaxslarni jazolash tizimini tahlil qilishga bag‘ishlangan. Muallif tomonidan xorijiy davlatlar qonunchiligi, shuningdek jamoaviy tuzilmalarning korrupsiyaga oid jinoyatlari uchun jinoiy jazolarni qo‘llashning ilmiy-nazariy va amaliy asoslari ko‘rib chiqilib, shuning asosida ularning eng maqbul turlari ajratib olingan. Ilmiy ishda xorijiy davlatlarning huquqni qo‘llash amaliyotidagi ayrim holatlar misolida u yoki bu chorani qo‘llash zarurati, uning yuridik shaxslarga nisbatan jinoiy faoliyatiga chek qo‘yish va oldini olish hamda ushbu subyektlarning qonuniy xulq-atvorini shakllantirish maqsadida ta’sir ko‘rsatish samaradorligi asoslab berilgan. Bundan tashqari, maqolada ijtimoiy va iqtisodiy oqibatlar nuqtayi nazaridan jinoyat-huquqiy majburlashning ayrim turlarini belgilash va qo‘llash bo‘yicha muallifning pozitsiyasi aks ettirilgan. O‘rganish natijalariga ko‘ra, korrupsiyaga oid huquqbuzarliklar uchun yuridik shaxslarga qo‘llaniladigan asosiy va qo‘shimcha jazo turlarining yaxlit tizimi tizimlashtirildi va ishlab chiqildi, kelajakda ular milliy jinoyat qonunchiligiga kiritilishi yoki BMTning Korrupsiyaga qarshi konvensiyasining 26-moddasini implementatsiya qilishga oid taklif va tavsiyalar tayyorlashda qo‘llanilishi mumkin.
Iqtiboslar
1. Alimov G.A., Isroilov B.I. Tenevaja jekonomika, korrupcija, vzjatochnichestva: ugolovno-pravovaja ocenka [Shadow economy, corruption, bribery: criminal law assessment]. Tashkent, Adolat Publ., 2020, 202 p.
2. Ajsin S. B. Celi ugolovnogo nakazanija juridicheskih lic [The goals of criminal punishment of legal entities]. Materialy Vserossijskoj zaochnoj konferencii s mezhdunarodnym uchastiem [Observance of human and civil rights in the activities of employees of internal affairs bodies]. Krasnodar, 2014, pp. 3-8 (In Russ.).
3. Siemens AG and Three Subsidiaries Plead Guilty to Foreign Corrupt Practices Act Violations and Agree to Pay $450 Million in Combined Criminal Fines. Available at: https://www.justice.gov/archive/opa/pr/2008/December/08-crm-1105.html (accessed 18.03.2022).
4. United States V. Alcatel-Lucent France, S.A., Et Al Court Docket Number: 10-CR-20906 Available at: https://www.justice.gov/criminal-fraud/case/united-states-v-alcatel-lucent-france-sa-et-al-court-docket/ (accessed 18.03.2022).
5. BAE Systems PLC Pleads Guilty and Ordered to Pay $400 Million Criminal Fine Available at: https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/bae-systems-plc-pleads-guilty-and-ordered-pay-400-million-criminal-fine/ (accessed: 18 March 2022).
6. United States V. Kellogg Brown & Root LLC Court Docket Number: 09-CR-071 Available at: https://www.justice.gov/criminal-fraud/case/united-states-v-kellogg-brown-root-llc-court-docket-number-09-cr-071/ (accessed 18.03.2022).
7. U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s press release on Mobile TeleSystems Settles FCPA Violations. Available at: https://www.sec.gov/news/press-release/2019-27/ (accessed 18.03.2022).
8. «Nuzhno razvivat’ korporativnuju ugolovnuju otvetstvennost’» — glava Minjusta. Available at: https://www.gazeta.uz/ru/2020/09/22/corporate-responsibility/ (accessed 18.03.2022).
9. Bugaevskaja N.V. Perspektivy vvedenija ugolovnoj otvetstvennosti juridicheskih lic za korrupcionnye prestuplenija i primenenija otdel’nyh vidov ugolovnogo nakazanija [Prospects for the introduction of criminal liability of legal entities for corruption offenses and the application of certain types of criminal punishment]. Penal Law, 2019, vol. 14 (1–4), no. 2, pp. 189–195. DOI: 10.33463/2072-2427.2019.14(1-4).2.189-195/.
10. The Economist: You get who you pay for. Available at: https://www.economist.com/finance-and-economics/2012/06/02/you-get-who-you-pay-for/ (accessed 18.03.2022).
11. Bekker G. Prestuplenie i nakazanie: jekonomicheskij podhod [Crime and Punishment: An Economic Approach]. Moscow, Origins, 2000, pp. 38-45.
12. Ajsin S. B. Shtraf kak jeffektivnaja mera ugolovnogo nakazanija juridicheskih lic za jekologicheskie prestuplenija [Fine as an effective measure of criminal punishment of legal entities for environmental crimes]. Bulletin of the Institute of Legislation of the Republic of Kazakhstan, 2012,
no. 1 (25), pp. 96-99.
13. Rupchev G. Sravnitel’nyj analiz otvetstvennosti juridicheskih lic (korporativnoj otvetstvennosti) za prestuplenija korrupcionnoj napravlennosti: tehnicheskij document [Comparative Analysis of Liability of Legal Entities (Corporate Liability) for Corruption Crimes: White Paper]. ECCU-PRECOP-TP-5/2015.
14. Polozhenie o bor’be s praktikoj korrupcii za rubezhom [Regulation on Combating Corruption Practices Abroad]. Available at: https://nocorruption.old.rt.ru/documents/159 (accessed 18.03.2022).
15. OECD Convention on Combating Bribery of Foreign Public Officials in International Business Transactions and related documents. Available at: https://www.oecd.org/daf/anti-bribery/ConvCombatBribery_ENG.pdf (accessed: 18 March 2022)
16. SBM Offshore N.V. settles bribery case for US$ 240,000,000. Available at: https://www.prosecutionservice.nl/latest/news/2014/11/12/sbm-offshore-n.v.-settles-bribery-case-for-ususd-240000000/ (accessed 18.03.2022).
17. BGH 5 StR 119/05 - Urteil vom 2. Dezember 2005 (LG Köln). Available at prosecutionservice.nl // URL: https://www.hrr-strafrecht.de/hrr/5/05/5-119-05.php/ (accessed 18.03.2022).Demin S.G. Predely ugolovnoj otvetstvennosti juridicheskih lic v Rossii: dissertacija ... kjun [Limits of criminal liability of legal entities in Russia: dissertation ... cand.jur.sci.]. Krasnodar, 2014, 251 p.
18. Hoppe T., Poljejn M., Rupchev G., Livshic M., Grasso K. i dr. Otvetstvennost’ juridicheskih lic za korrupcionnye pravonarushenija [Liability of legal entities for corruption offenses.]. EU, 2021, 102 p.
19. Sitnik V.N. Vidy ugolovnyh nakazanij dlja juridicheskih lic: teoreticheskaja model’ [Types of criminal penalties for legal entities: a theoretical model.]. Young Explorer’s Almanac, 2020, no. 9, pp. 83-87.
20. Gafurov R.B. Problemy vvedenija ugolovnoj otvetstvennosti juridicheskih lic v Respublike Uzbekistan [Problems of introducing criminal liability of legal entities in the Republic of Uzbekistan]. Bulletin of the Academy of the General Prosecutor’s Office of the Republic of Uzbekistan, 2018, no. 3 (17), pp. 49-51
21. Kachalov, V. V. Nakazanija dlja juridicheskih lic po ugolovnomu pravu zarubezhnyh stran [Punishments for legal entities under the criminal law of foreign countries] Bulletin of the Tula State University. Economic and legal sciences, 2014, no. 3-2, pp. 164-170.
22. Salybekova T.S. Sistema nakazanij i inyh mer ugolovno-pravovogo haraktera v otnoshenii juridicheskih lic i inyh kollektivnyh obrazovanij [The system of punishments and other measures of a criminal law nature in relation to legal entities and other collective entities]. Scientific and Information Publishing Center “Institute for Strategic Studies”, 2017, pp. 74-80.
Nashr qilingan
Son
Bo‘lim
Litsenziya
Mualliflik huquqi (c) 2022 YURISPRUDENSIYA
Ushbu ish Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ostida litsenziyalangan.
