CROSS-BORDER INSOLVENCY LAW: THEORETICAL APPROACHES AND CONTEMPORARY CHALLENGES

Mualliflar

Kalit so‘zlar:

transchegaraviy to‘lovga qobiliyatsizlik, xalqaro bankrotlik huquqi, universalizm, territorializm, kreditorlar tengligi, “forum shopping”, xalqaro hamkorlik, bankrotlik jarayonlari, UNCITRAL

Annotatsiya

Mazkur maqolada transchegaraviy to‘lovga qobiliyatsizlik huquqining shakllanishi, mazmuni va asosiy muammolari tahlil qilinadi. Globalizatsiya va xalqaro iqtisodiy aloqalarning kengayishi natijasida bankrotlik jarayonlarining bir nechta davlatlarni qamrab olishi tobora ko‘proq uchramoqda. Maqolada universalizm va territorializm nazariyalari, ularning afzallik va kamchiliklari, shuningdek, davlatlar o‘rtasida hamkorlik va muvofiqlashtirishning ahamiyati yoritilgan. Xalqaro tashkilotlar tomonidan ishlab chiqilgan huquqiy standartlar va zamonaviy yondashuvlar alohida tahlil qilinadi. Tadqiqot natijalari transchegaraviy to‘lovga qobiliyatsizlik huquqini takomillashtirish, milliy qonunchilikni xalqaro standartlarga moslashtirish hamda amaliyotda samarali huquqiy mexanizmlarni ishlab chiqishda ilmiy va amaliy ahamiyat kasb etadi.

Iqtiboslar

1.Bufford, S. L., et al. (2001). International insolvency. Federal Judicial Center.

2.Federal Ministry of Justice (Germany). (n.d.). Insolvency Code (Insolvenzordnung). http://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/englisch_inso/

3.Fletcher, I. F. (2005). Insolvency in private international law: National and international approaches (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.

4.Friman, H. (n.d.). Transchegaraviy toʻlovga qobiliyatsizlik qoidalari boʻyicha muhokamalar [Discussions on cross-border insolvency rules]. 5.Unpublished master-class materials prepared for the LL.M. programme in International Insolvency Law, University of Pretoria.

5.INSOL International. (2025). INSOL World, Q4 2025. https://www.insol.org/getmedia/57649a7a-1785-45f7-8981-a179f3acdefc/IW-Q4-2025.pdf

6.LoPucki, L. M. (1999). Cooperation in international insolvency: A post-universalist approach. Cornell Law Review, 84, 696–762.

7.Lunts, L. A. (1976). Mnogonatsionalnye predpriyatiya kapitalisticheskikh stran v aspekte mezhdunarodnogo chastnogo prava [Multinational enterprises of capitalist countries in the aspect of private international law]. Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo [Soviet State and Law], 5, 124.

8.Mokhova, E. V. (2012). Tsentr osnovnykh interesov dolzhnika pri transgranichnoy nesostoyatel’nosti: perspektivy vvedeniya v Rossii novykh pravovykh konstruktsiy [The center of main interests of the debtor in cross-border insolvency: Prospects for introducing new legal concepts in Russia]. Zakon [Law], (10), 111–127.

8.Republic of Uzbekistan. (1997, March 1). Civil Code. https://lex.uz

9.Republic of Uzbekistan. (2022, April 12). Law “On insolvency”. https://lex.uz

10.Rasmussen, R. K. (1998). A new approach to transnational insolvencies. Michigan Journal of International Law, 19, 1–36.

Yuklab Olishlar

Nashr qilingan

2026-04-06

Qanday Iqtibos Keltirish

CROSS-BORDER INSOLVENCY LAW: THEORETICAL APPROACHES AND CONTEMPORARY CHALLENGES. (2026). YURISPRUDENSIYA, 6(1), 21-27. https://yurisprudensiya.tsul.uz/index.php/yurisprudensiya/article/view/719