Transchegaraviy to‘lovga qobiliyatsizlik huquqi: nazariy yondashuvlar va zamonaviy muammolar
Keywords:
cross-border insolvency, international bankruptcy law, universalism, territoriality, equality of creditors, forum shopping, international cooperation, bankruptcy processes, UNCITRALAbstract
This article analyzes the formation, content, and main problems of transnational insolvency. As a result of globalization and the expansion of international economic relations, the involvement of several countries in bankruptcy processes is becoming increasingly common. The article highlights the theories of universalism and territoriality, their advantages and disadvantages, as well as the importance of cooperation and coordination between states. Legal standards and modern approaches developed by international organizations will be analyzed separately. The results of the study are of scientific and practical importance in improving the law of transnational insolvency, adapting national legislation to international standards, and developing effective legal mechanisms in practice.
References
1.Bufford, S. L., et al. (2001). International insolvency. Federal Judicial Center.
2.Federal Ministry of Justice (Germany). (n.d.). Insolvency Code (Insolvenzordnung). http://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/englisch_inso/
3.Fletcher, I. F. (2005). Insolvency in private international law: National and international approaches (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.
4.Friman, H. (n.d.). Transchegaraviy toʻlovga qobiliyatsizlik qoidalari boʻyicha muhokamalar [Discussions on cross-border insolvency rules]. 5.Unpublished master-class materials prepared for the LL.M. programme in International Insolvency Law, University of Pretoria.
5.INSOL International. (2025). INSOL World, Q4 2025. https://www.insol.org/getmedia/57649a7a-1785-45f7-8981-a179f3acdefc/IW-Q4-2025.pdf
6.LoPucki, L. M. (1999). Cooperation in international insolvency: A post-universalist approach. Cornell Law Review, 84, 696–762.
7.Lunts, L. A. (1976). Mnogonatsionalnye predpriyatiya kapitalisticheskikh stran v aspekte mezhdunarodnogo chastnogo prava [Multinational enterprises of capitalist countries in the aspect of private international law]. Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo [Soviet State and Law], 5, 124.
8.Mokhova, E. V. (2012). Tsentr osnovnykh interesov dolzhnika pri transgranichnoy nesostoyatel’nosti: perspektivy vvedeniya v Rossii novykh pravovykh konstruktsiy [The center of main interests of the debtor in cross-border insolvency: Prospects for introducing new legal concepts in Russia]. Zakon [Law], (10), 111–127.
8.Republic of Uzbekistan. (1997, March 1). Civil Code. https://lex.uz
9.Republic of Uzbekistan. (2022, April 12). Law “On insolvency”. https://lex.uz
10.Rasmussen, R. K. (1998). A new approach to transnational insolvencies. Michigan Journal of International Law, 19, 1–36.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 JURISPRUDENCE
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
