Transchegaraviy to‘lovga qobiliyatsizlik huquqi: nazariy yondashuvlar va zamonaviy muammolar
Kalit so‘zlar:
xalqaro xususiy huquq, transchegaraviy zarar, huquqni tanlash, arbitraj, kollizion huquq, prinsip, globallashuvAnnotatsiya
Juda tez surʼatlar bilan oʻsib borayotgan global iqtisodiy munosabatlar, savdo va ishlab chiqarish jarayonlari bilan bogʻliq faoliyatlar natijasida yuzaga kelayotgan nizolar va ularning samarali yechimlarini ishlab chiqish bugungi kunda dolzarb ahamiyat kasb etmoqda. Mazkur tadqiqot ishi bu kabi muammolarni hal qilishning huquqiy asoslarini ishlab chiqishda xalqaro xususiy huquqning roli qanchalik muhimligini ilmiy faktlar, nazariy tahlillar va amaliy misollar yordamida ochib beradi. Shuningdek, ushbu maqolada sohaga taalluqli raqamli iqtisodiyot va hududiy savdo bitimlari kabi hozirgi kundagi masalalar tadqiq qilinib, ushbu zamonaviy muammolarni hal qilishda xalqaro xususiy huquq vositalarining moslashuvchanligi ham oʻrganilgan. Shuningdek, maqola bugungi kunda transchegaraviy iqtisodiy munosabatlarda xalqaro xususiy huquqning tutgan rolini mustahkamlash uchun olib borilayotgan ilmiy ishlar uchun muhim xulosalarni taqdim etadi. Xalqaro xususiy huquqning rivojlanishi va tegishli sohaga moslashishi uchun beriladigan takliflar uning kelajakda paydo boʻlishi mumkin boʻlgan nizolarni hal qilish va transchegaraviy faoliyatni yangi bosqichga koʻtarishga hissa qoʻshadi.
Iqtiboslar
1.Okoli, C., & Yekini, A. (2024). Implied jurisdiction agreements in international commercial contracts: A global comparative perspective. 2.Journal of Private International Law, 19(3), 321–361. https://doi.org/10.1080/174448.2023.2294615
3.Avliyoqulov, B. (2023). Navigating the legal landscape of robots and AI in the workplace: Challenges and solutions. Uzbek Journal of Law and Digital Policy, 1(3).
4.Gulyamov, S. S., & Avliyoqulov, B. B. (2025). Ish joylarida sunʼiy intellektning huquqiy maqomi va xodimlarga taʼsiri [The legal status of artificial intelligence in the workplace and its impact on employees]. Miasto Przyszłości [City of the Future], (59), 34–40.
5.Imamova, D. (2024). Improving the legal regulation of obligation relations in international private law. Yuridik fanlar axborotnomasi [Review of Legal Sciences], 3, 8–14.
6.Kaal, W. A., & Painter, R. W. (2012). Forum competition and choice of law competition in securities law after Morrison v. National Australia 7.Bank. Minnesota Law Review, 133(1), 165–185.
8.Kramer, X. E. (2013). Private law and behaviour. In W. H. van Boom, I. Giesen, & A. J. Verheij (Eds.), Handboek empirie en privaatrecht (pp. 141–142). Boom Juridische Uitgevers.
9.Lehmann, M. (2020). Regulation, global governance and private international law: Squaring the triangle. Journal of Private International Law, 16(1), 1–25.
10.Michaels, R. (2004). Territorial jurisdiction after territoriality. In P. J. Slot & M. Bulterman (Eds.), Globalisation and jurisdiction (pp. 105–115). Kluwer Law International.
11.OʻConnell, D. P., & McCarthy, S. J. (Eds.). (2024). The handbook of global commercial dispute resolution. Wiley Blackwell.
12.Pistor, K. (2024). The role of private law in public interest litigation: Challenges and opportunities. Global Constitutionalism, 10(1), 1–20.
13.Ruhl, J. B., & Dorsey, E. M. (2024). Climate change litigation: The intersection with private international law and corporate accountability. Harvard Environmental Law Review, 48(1), 45–78.
14.Van Hoecke, M., & Warrington, M. E. (2023). The impact of globalization on private international law: A critical analysis. European Journal of Legal Studies, 15(1), 50–75.
15.Van Zanten, J. H., & Van der Meulen, R. J. (Eds.). (2024). Cross-border dispute resolution: Theory and practice. Edward Elgar Publishing.
Wong, W. (2024). A principled conflict of laws characterisation of fraud in letters of credit. Journal of Private International Law, 19(3), 383–419.
16.Xazratqulov, O. (2024). “Lex informatica” – raqamli huquqlarni amalga oshirishning kollizion prinsipi sifatida [“Lex informatica” as a conflict principle for the enforcement of digital rights]. Yurisprudensiya [Jurisprudence], 4, 71–81.
Yuklab Olishlar
Nashr qilingan
Son
Bo‘lim
Litsenziya
Mualliflik huquqi (c) 2026 YURISPRUDENSIYA
Ushbu ish Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ostida litsenziyalangan.
