SUN’IY INTELLEKT TIZIMLARINING FUQAROLIK-HUQUQIY JAVOBGARLIGI: ZAMONAVIY HUQUQIY MUAMMOLAR VA TARTIBGA SOLISH YONDASHUVLARI
Kalit so‘zlar:
sun’iy intellekt, sun’iy intellektning javobgarligi, delikt huquqi, intellektual mulk huquqi, huquqqa xilof xatti-harakat, tabiiy ehtimoliy oqibat, royaltiAnnotatsiya
Mazkur maqolada sun’iy intellekt tizimining o‘z harakatlari yoki harakatsizligi uchun fuqarolik-huquqiy javobgarligi bilan bog‘liq nazariy va amaliy muammolar tadqiq etilgan. Bundan tashqari, sun’iy intellekt tomonidan sodir etilgan delikt uchun fuqarolik-huquqiy javobgarlikka tortishning turli yondashuvlari va konsepsiyalari ilmiy jihatdan tahlil qilingan. Tadqiqot natijasida sun’iy intellektni hozirgi bosqichda fuqarolik-huquqiy javobgarlikning mustaqil subyekti sifatida e’tirof etish uchun yetarli huquqiy asoslar mavjud emasligi asoslantirilgan. Shuningdek, sun’iy intellekt sohasidagi fuqarolik-huquqiy munosabatlarni takomillashtirish hamda uning huquqiy maqomini belgilashga oid masalalarni yaqin kelajakda ilmiy va normativ-huquqiy jihatdan yanada chuqur tadqiq etish zarurligi xulosa qilingan.
Iqtiboslar
American Law Institute. (1962). Model Penal Code. https://openlibrary.org/books/OL2870811M/Model_penal_code?utm
Asaro, P. M. (2007). Robots and responsibility from a legal perspective. ResearchGate.
Benhamou, Y. (2009). Compensation of prejudice for infringements of intellectual property rights in France, under the Directive 2004/48/EC and its transposition law: New notions? International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 40(2), 126–149.
Buyers, J. (2015, September). Liability issues in autonomous and semi-autonomous systems. SlideShare. https://www.slideshare.net/JohnBuyers1/liability-issues-in-autonomous-and-semiautonomous-systems
Calabresi, G., & Melamed, A. D. (1972). Property rules, liability rules, and inalienability: One view of the cathedral. Harvard Law Review, 85(6), 1089–1128.
DeBessonet, C. G., & Cross, G. R. (1986). An artificial intelligence application in the law: CCLIPS, a computer program that processes legal information. High Technology Law Journal, 1(2), 329–409.
Decker, M. (2012). Robo- and information ethics: Some fundamentals. In M. Decker & M. Gutmann (Eds.), Robo- and information ethics: Some fundamentals (pp. 1–264). LIT Verlag.
Freitas, P., de Andrade, F. A., & Novais, P. J. (2014). Criminal liability of autonomous agents: From the unthinkable to the plausible. In M. Palmirani, U. Pagallo, P. Casanovas, & G. Sartor (Eds.), AI approaches to the complexity of legal systems (pp. 145–156). Springer.
Gunkel, D. J. (2012). The machine question: Critical perspectives on AI, robots, and ethics. MIT Press.
Hallevy, G. (2010). The criminal liability of artificial intelligence entities—From science fiction to legal social control. Akron Intellectual Property Journal, 4(2), 171–201.
Hallevy, G. (2015). Liability for crimes involving artificial intelligence systems. Springer International Publ.
Hamroqulov, B. (2020). Ma’naviy ziyonni qoplashning huquqiy asoslari [Legal basis for compensation for moral damage]. Lesson Press.
Kingston, J. K. C. (2016). Artificial intelligence and legal liability. In M. Bramer & M. Petridis (Eds.), Research and Development in Intelligent Systems XXXIII (pp. 269–279). Springer.
Malle, B. F., Scheutz, M., & Austerweil, J. L. (2017). Networks of social and moral norms in human and robot agents. In M. I. Aldinhas Ferreira, J. S. Sequeira, M. O. Tokhi, E. E. Kadar, & G. S. Virk (Eds.), A world with robots: International Conference on Robot Ethics (pp. 3–17). Springer.
Mehlman, M., Berg, J. W., & Ray, S. (2017). Robot law. SSRN. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2908488
Nevejans, N. (2016). European civil law rules in robotics. Policy Department for Citizens’ Rights and Constitutional Affairs, European Parliament. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2016/571379/IPOL_STU(2016)571379_EN.pdf
Nikolaeva, Y. V., Bogolyubova, N. M., Shirin, S. S., & Portnyagina, M. A. (2018). Philosophical view of multiculturalism in modern European cinematography. European Journal of Science and Theology, 14(6), 205–214.
Scherer, M. U. (2016). Regulating artificial intelligence systems: Risks, challenges, competencies, and strategies. Harvard Journal of Law & Technology, 29(2), 353–400.
Shavell, S. (2004). Foundations of economic analysis of law. Harvard University Press.
Solaiman, S. M. (2017). Legal personality of robots, corporations, idols and chimpanzees: A quest for legitimacy. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 25(2), 155–179.
The Law Society. (2017). Artificial intelligence and the legal profession. The Law Society’s Horizon Scanning Programme. https://www.academia.edu/36920594/Artificial_Intelligence_and_the_Legal_Profession
Weng, Y. H., Chen, C. H., & Sun, C. T. (2009). Towards the human-robot co-existence society: On safety intelligence for next generation robots. International Journal of Social Robotics, 1(4), 267–282.
Yuklab Olishlar
Nashr qilingan
Son
Bo‘lim
Litsenziya
Mualliflik huquqi (c) 2026 YURISPRUDENSIYA
Ushbu ish Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ostida litsenziyalangan.
