TERGOVDA AYBLOVGA MOYILLIK: KOGNITIV SABABLAR, QIYOSIY-HUQUQIY TAHLIL VA PROTSESSUAL BARTARAF ETISH MEXANIZMLARI
Kalit so‘zlar:
ayblovga moyillik, kognitiv buzilish, tonnel ko‘rish, tasdiqlash moyilligi, obyektivlik prinsipi, muqobil versiyalar tahlili, mutanosib maqbul emaslik, protsessual kafolatlarAnnotatsiya
Maqolada jinoyat tergovi jarayonida tergovchi faoliyatiga xos ayblovga moyillik (обвинительный уклон) hodisasi kompleks – normativ, kognitiv-psixologik va institutsional – yondashuv asosida tahlil qilingan. Zamonaviy xalqaro (“tonnel ko‘rish” va “tasdiqlash moyilligi” nazariyalari), Yevropa, postsovet va milliy doktrina manbalari qiyosiy oʻrganilib, ayblovga moyillikning kognitiv ildizlari ochib berilgan. Maqolaning maqsadi — ayblovga moyillikning kognitiv, qiyosiy-huquqiy va institutsional jihatlarini kompleks tahlil qilib, uni bartaraf etuvchi protsessual mexanizmlar tizimini ishlab chiqish hamda ularni ilmiy yangilik sifatida qoʻllash imkoniyatlarini asoslashdan iborat. Tadqiqotda normativ-dogmatik, qiyosiy-huquqiy, tizimli-tarkibiy va sotsiologik (soʻrov) usullari qoʻllangan. Ayblovga moyillikni bartaraf etishning yetti tarkibli protsessual mexanizmlar tizimi hamda uni empirik asoslash metodologiyasi taklif etilgan.
Iqtiboslar
Bazarbaeva, T. R. (2022). Realizatsiya printsipa sostyazatelnosti i ravnopraviya storon v dosudebnoy stadii ugolovnogo protsessa [Implementation of the principle of adversarial proceedings and equality of the parties at the pre-trial stage of criminal proceedings] (Masterʼs thesis in law). Academy of Law Enforcement Agencies under the Prosecutor Generalʼs Office of the Republic of Kazakhstan.
Elaad, E. (2022). Tunnel vision and confirmation bias among police investigators and laypeople in hypothetical criminal contexts. SAGE Open, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221095022
Lidén, M. (2023). Confirmation bias in criminal cases. Oxford University Press.
Maegherman, E., Ask, K., Horselenberg, R., & van Koppen, P. J. (2021). Test of the analysis of competing hypotheses in legal decision-making. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 35(1), 282–289. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3738
Mamadiyev, S. N. (2009). Jinoyat ishini sudga qadar yuritishda shikoyat berish muddatlari [Time limits for filing complaints in pre-trial criminal proceedings]. Uzbek Law Review, (1–2), 50–53.
Poʻlatov, B. Kh. (2003). Prokurorning jinoyat ishlarini sudda koʻrishda ishtiroki muammolari [Problems of the prosecutorʼs participation in the consideration of criminal cases in court] (Abstract of a doctoral dissertation). Tashkent.
President of the Republic of Uzbekistan. (2026, February 16). On additional measures to consistently continue reforms and bring them to a new stage within the framework of priority directions of the countryʼs development until 2030 (Decree No. DP-21). Lex.uz. https://lex.uz/docs/8050769
Rahimov, Y. (2000). Oʻzbekiston Respublikasining Jinoyat-protsessual kodeksi asosida soʻroq qilish va koʻrsatuvlarga baho berishning protsessual-psixologik muammolari [Procedural and psychological problems of interrogation and evaluation of testimony based on the Criminal Procedure Code of the Republic of Uzbekistan] (Abstract of a doctoral dissertation). Tashkent.
Rassin, E., Eerland, A., & Kuijpers, I. (2010). Letʼs find the evidence: An analogue study of confirmation bias in criminal investigations. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 7(3), 231–246.
Republic of Kazakhstan. (2014, July 4). Criminal Procedure Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan. Adilet.zan.kz.
Republic of Uzbekistan. (1994, September 22). Criminal Procedure Code of the Republic of Uzbekistan. Lex.uz. https://lex.uz/docs/-111460
Rossmo, D. K., & Pollock, J. M. (2019). Confirmation bias and other systemic causes of wrongful convictions: A sentinel events perspective. Northeastern University Law Review, 11(2), 790–835.
Ryabinina, T. K. (2010). Sudebnyy sledovatel – institut proshlogo ili nadezhda na budushchee? [Investigating judge – an institution of the past or hope for the future?]. In Ugolovnaya yustitsiya: Svyaz vremen [Criminal justice: Connecting the times] (Proceedings of the International Association for the Promotion of Justice).
Salet, R., & Terpstra, J. (2014). Critical review in criminal investigation: Evaluation of a measure to prevent tunnel vision. Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice, 8(1), 43–50. https://doi.org/10.1093/police/pat039
Schünemann, B., & Bandilla, W. (1989). Perseverance in courtroom decisions. In H. Wegener, F. Lösel, & J. Haisch (Eds.), Criminal behavior and the justice system: Psychological perspectives (pp. 181–192). Springer.
Singelnstein, T. (2016). Confirmation Bias — Die Bestätigungsneigung als kognitive Verzerrung bei polizeilichen Ermittlungen im Strafverfahren. Criminal Defense Attorney, 36, 830–836.
Supreme Court of the Republic of Uzbekistan. (2026). 2025-yilda jinoyat ishlari boʻyicha sudlar faoliyati yakunlari toʻgʻrisida [On the results of the activities of criminal courts in 2025]. Press Service of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Uzbekistan.
Tulaganova, G. Z. (2006). Dastlabki tergovda tortishuv [Adversarial proceedings in the preliminary investigation]. Lawyer, (4).
Zhamborov, M. S. (2013). Konstitutsionnyy printsip sostyazatelnosti kak sposob argumentirovannogo obosnovaniya prinyatiya pozitsii storony v rossiyskom sudoproizvodstve [The constitutional principle of adversarial proceedings as a method of reasoned justification for adopting a party’s position in Russian judicial proceedings]. Aktualnye problemy rossiyskogo prava, (4), 424–432.
Yuklab Olishlar
Nashr qilingan
Son
Bo‘lim
Litsenziya
Mualliflik huquqi (c) 2026 YURISPRUDENSIYA
Ushbu ish Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ostida litsenziyalangan.
