INVIOLABILITY OF THE RIGHT OF OWNERSHIP OF SUBJECTS OF BUSINESS ACTIVITY
Keywords:
private property, inviolability, restriction, public and community needs, compensationAbstract
The article examines the main problems associated with the consolidation of the most important fundamental right in the constitution of the state – the right of private property, suggests approaches to identifying the content of the constitutional principle of inviolability of property, considers the possibility of distinguishing between subjective property rights and the corresponding sectoral (civil law) law, analyzes the features of regulation of private property rights in relation to the most important (constitutional) property objects. The author focuses on the civil law principle of inviolability of property, which arises with objective inevitability and ensures both the legality of a person’s connection with a thing and its continuous functioning. However, as the article emphasizes, for the effective implementation of this key principle, it is necessary to see and take into account the social function of property rights associated with the fair distribution of resources and the affirmation of the spiritual principles of modern civil society. Objective: to trace the patterns of civil law regulation of relations related to the forced termination of property right;. to develop scientifically-based recommendations for improving this institution in order to effectively implement the principle of inviolability of property and taking into account both the material and social aspects of its manifestation. Also practical examples related to the restriction of freedom of entrepreneurial activity and violation of the inviolability of private property, solutions to eliminate problematic situations are given.
References
1. Goshulyak V.V. Institut sobstvennosti v konstitutsionnom prave Rossii [The institution of property in the constitutional law of Russia]. Moscow, 2003, p. 72.
2. Kutafin O.E. Neprikosnovennost v konstitutsionnom prave Rossiyskoy Federatsii [Immunity in the constitutional law of the Russian Federation]. Moscow, Yurist, 2004, p. 245.
3. Patyulin V.A. Neprikosnovennost lichnosti kak pravovoy institut [Inviolability of the person as a legal institution]. Sovetskoye gosudarstvo i pravo – Soviet state and law, 1973, no. 11, p. 13.
4. Gadjiyev G.A. Konstitutsionnye osnovy sovremennogo prava sobstvennosti [Constitutional foundations of modern property rights]. Journal of Russian Law, 2006, no. 12, p. 18.
5. Mattei U., Suhanov Ye.A. Osnovnye polojeniya prava sobstvennosti [Basic Provisions of Ownership]. Moscow, 1999, pp. 208-209.
6. Kurdinovskiy V.I. Ob ogranicheniyah prava sobstvennosti na nedvijimoye imushhestvo po zakonu: (po russkomu pravu) [On restrictions on ownership of real estate by law: (according to Russian law)]. Odessa, 1904, pp. 81-82.
7. Kamyshanskiy V.P. Predely i ogranicheniya prava sobstvennosti [Limits and Restrictions of Ownership]. Volgograd, 2000, pp. 69-70.
8. Kamyshanskiy V.P. Konstitutsionnye ogranicheniya prava sobstvennosti [Constitutional restrictions on property rights]. Pravovye voprosy nedvijimosti – Legal issues of real estate, 2004, no. 2, p. 45.
9. Hess T. Ist «Nutzungseigentum» noch Eigentum? [Is “useful ownership” still property?]. PhD thesis. Marburg, 1976, p. 146.
10. Bernam U. Pravovaya sistema Soyedinennyh Shtatov Ameriki [Legal system of the United States of America]. Moscow, Novaya yustitsiya, 2006, p. 747.
11. Honore A.M. Ownership. Oxford Essays in Jurisprudence. Oxford, 1961, pp. 107-147.
12. Andreyev V.K. O prave chastnoy sobstvennosti v Rossii (kriticheskiy ocherk) [On the right of private property in Russia (a critical essay)]. Moscow, 2007, p. 21.
13. Voyevodin L.D. Konstitutsionnye prava i obyazannosti sovetskih grajdan [Constitutional rights and obligations of Soviet citizens]. Moscow, 1972, p. 101.
14. Anisimov A.P., Melihov A.I. Konstitutsionno-pravovoye regulirovaniye prava chastnoy sobstvennosti na zemelnye uchastki [Constitutional and legal regulation of the right of private ownership of land]. Volgograd, 2009, p. 63.
15. Besshtanko A.V. Konstitutsionno-pravovye osnovy chastnoy sobstvennosti v Rossiyskoy Federatsii [Constitutional and legal foundations of private property in the Russian Federation]. Abstract of PhD thesis. Yekaterinburg, 2002. - S. 8.
16. Malinovskaya V.M. Pravomernoye ogranicheniye konstitutsionnyh prav i svobod cheloveka i grajdanina v Rossiyskoy Federatsii [Lawful restriction of constitutional rights and freedoms of man and citizen in the Russian Federation]. Abstract of PhD thesis. Moscow, 2007, p. 7.
17. Kvitko A.F. Konstitutsionno-pravovye osnovy ogranicheniya prav i svobod cheloveka i grajdanina v Rossiyskoy Federatsii [Constitutional and legal foundations for restricting the rights and freedoms of man and citizen in the Russian Federation]. Abstract of PhD thesis. Moscow, 2007, p. 8.
18. Kommentariy k Konstitutsii RF [Commentary on the Constitution of the Russian Federation]. Ed. V.D. Karpovich. Moscow, 2002, p. 380.
Maslova V.I. Postanovleniye Konstitutsionnogo suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 27.06.2001, № 11-P [Resolution of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation dated 27.06.2001, No. 11-P]. Rossiyskaya Gazeta, 2001, 4 July.
19. Determination of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation of December 1, 2005 No. 519-O on the refusal to accept for consideration the complaint of the citizen Golubka Sergey Alexandrovich for violation of his constitutional rights by subparagraph 1 of paragraph 1 of Article 7 of the Federal Law “On counteracting the legalization (laundering) of proceeds from crime and the financing of terrorism”. Reference legal system “Consultant Plus”.
