ISSUES OF INFLUENCE OF RELATIONS OF THE BRANCHES OF POWER FOR THE FORM OF STATE GOVERNMENT
Keywords:
separation of powers, the form of government, parliament, president, government, a system of checks and balances, mechanism of the stateAbstract
This article provides a comprehensive analysis of the role of public administration in the effective implementation of the principle of separation of powers. The problem of rational balance between parliament and government in the system of state power is relevant today. The relationship between the legislature and the executive is an important tool that directly affects the form of governance of each state. According to the author, the control and interaction of the branches of government without acting as an observer is important in the implementation of the state mechanism, but in the process, the branches of government must exercise their powers independently. The author also divides modern models of these relations into the following types depending on the principle of separation of powers and the principle of mutual balance and restraint: presidential, parliamentary and mixed. Analyzing the best practices of foreign countries and the approaches of legal scholars to the form of governance, given the specifics of the form of governance of the Republic of Uzbekistan in terms of functions, tasks and powers of the branches of government and the level of responsibility and mutual control.
References
1. Xakimov R. Davlat hokimiyati tizimida parlament: nazariya va amaliyot muammolari [Parliament in the system of state power: problems of theory and practice]. PhD thesis. Tashkent, 2009, p. 76.
2. Avakyan S. Konstitutsionnoye pravo Rossii [Constitution Law of Russia]. Moscow, TK Velby, Prospekt Publishing House, 2007, pp. 56–57.
3. Avdeev D. Rossiyskiy variant printsipa razdeleniya vlastey [Russian version of the principle of separation of powers]. Law and Politics, 2013, no. 13 (168), p. 1798.
4. Barto A. Vzaimodeystviye organov zakonodatelnoy i ispolnitel’noy vlasti v realizatsii politicheskikh reform (po materialam Krasnodarskogo kraya i Rostovskoy oblasti) [Interaction between legislative and executive authorities in the implementation of political reforms (based on the materials of the Krasnodar Territory and the Rostov Region]. Abstract of PhD dissertation. Krasnodar, 2010, p. 20.
5. Popova Yu.Yu. Organizatsionno-pravovye formy vzaimootnosheniy organov zakonodatel`noy (predstavitel`noy) i ispolnitel`noy vlasti subyektov Rossiyskoy Federatsii: na primere Dal`nevostochnogo okruga [Organizational and legal forms of relations between the legislative (representative) and executive authorities of the subjects of the Russian Federation: on the example of the Far Eastern District]. Abstract of PhD dissertation. Vladivostok, 2010, p. 8.
6. Zulfiqorov Sh. et al. Parlament va hukumatning oʻzaro munosabatlari: qiyosiy-huquqiy tahlil [The relationship between parliament and government: a comparative-legal analysis]. Tashkent, TSU Publ. House, 2015, p. 181.
7. Musayeva N. Jamiyatni demokratlashtirishda ikki palatali parlamentning ahamiyati [The role of a bicameral parliament in democratizing society]. PhD thesis. Tashkent, UzSWLU, 2007, p. 12.
8. Djumabayev K. Zakonodatel`naya i ispolnitel`naya vlasti: vzaimosvyaz` i vzaimodeystviye [Legislative and executive power: relationship and interaction]. PhD thesis. Tashkent, TSUL, 1993,
pp. 52–53.
9. Blazhich N. Modeli razdeleniya vlastey v pravovom gosudarstve [Models of separation of powers in a rule of law state]. Abstract of PhD dissertation. .Moscow, 2004, p. 18
10. The UK Parliament. Available at: https://www.parliament.uk/site-information/glossary/shadow-cabinet/.
11. Brunclik M. Patterns of Government Formation in Europe: the role of the head of state. Czech Journal of Political Science, 2015, no. 1, p. 30.
12. Strom K. Minority government and majority rule. Cambridge, Cambridge Univ. Press, 1990,
293 p.
13. Sidorov V. Dinamika koalitsionnykh pravitel`stv v parlamentskikh demokratiyakh [Dynamics of coalition governments in parliamentary democracies]. Uchenye zapiski Kazanskogo universiteta, Gumanitarnye nauki – Scientific notes of Kazan University, Humanities, 2011, vol. 153 (1), p. 192.
14. Akhmedshayeva M.A. Davlat hokimiyati tizimida ijro hokimiyati [Executive power in the system of state power]. Doctor’s degree dissertation. Tashkent, 2010, p. 111.
15. Xakimov R. Davlat hokimiyati tizimida parlament: nazariya va amaliyot muammolari [Parliament in the system of state power: problems of theory and practice]. PhD thesis. Tashkent. 2009, p. 75.
16. Tulteev I.T., Toshkanboyev U.T. Pravovoy mekhanizm vzaimodeystviya Oliy Mazhlisa i Kabineta Ministrov: sostayaniye, problemy i resheniya [Legal mechanism of interaction between the Oliy Majlis and the Cabinet of Ministers: status, problems and solutions]. Tashkent, 2014, p. 45.
17. Khutinayev I. Institut prezidenstva i problemy formy gosudarstva [Institute of presidency and problems of the form of the state]. Moscow, 1994, p. 31–32.
18. Krasnov M.A. “Neytral`naya vlast`” B. Konstana i “prezidentskiy arbitrazh” Sh. de Gollya [“Neutral power” by B. Constant and “presidential arbitration” by Charles de Gaulle]. State and Law, 2017, no. 6, pp. 60–69. EDN YSRZPF.
19. Mirakulov M. Pravovoye polozheniye Prezidenta Respubliki Uzbekistan v sisteme gosudarstvennoy vlasti [Legal status of the President of the Republic of Uzbekistan in the system of state power]. Law: history, theory, practice. Proceedings of the III Intern. scientific conf. St. Petersburg, 2015, July. St. Petersburg, Own Publ. house, 2015, p. 25.
20. Askarov Z.S. Oʻzbekiston Respublikasida milliy davlatchilik shakllanishining nazariy-huquqiy masalalari [Theoretical and legal issues of formation of national statehood in the Republic of Uzbekistan]. Abstract of PhD dissertation. Tashkent, SPbPU, 2018, p. 21.
