DAVLAT BOSHQARUVI SHAKLIGA HOKIMIYAT TARMOQLARI O‘RTASIDAGI MUNOSABATLARNING TA’SIRI MASALALARI
Kalit so‘zlar:
hokimiyatlar boʻlinishi prinsipi, davlat boshqaruvi shakli, parlament, prezident, hukumat, oʻzaro muvozanat va bir-birini tiyib turish tamoyili, davlat mexanizmiAnnotatsiya
Mazkur maqolada davlatning boshqaruv shakliga hokimiyat tarmoqlari oʻrtasidagi munosabatlarning taʼsiri masalalari tahlil etilgan. Davlat hokimiyati tizimida parlament va hukumat oʻrtasidagi oqilona muvozanat muammosi bugungi kunda dolzarb hisoblanadi. Qonun chiqaruvchi hokimiyat va ijro etuvchi hokimiyat oʻrtasidagi munosabatlar har bir davlatning boshqaruv shakliga bevosita taʼsir qiluvchi muhim vositadir. Muallifning fikricha, hokimiyat tarmoqlari kuzatuvchi vazifasini bajarmasdan, bir-birini nazorat qilishi va oʻzaro hamkorlikda davlat mexanizmini amalga oshirishi muhim hisoblanib, bu jarayonda hokimiyat tarmoqlari oʻz vakolatlarini mustaqil amalga oshirishlari lozim. Shuningdek, muallif mazkur munosabatlarning zamonaviy modellarini hokimiyatlar boʻlinishi prinsipi hamda oʻzaro muvozanat va bir-birini tiyib turish tamoyiliga ko‘ra quyidagi turlarga ajratadi: prezidentlik, parlamentar va aralash. Maqolada xorijiy mamlakatlarning ilgʻor tajribasi hamda huquqshunos olimlarning davlat boshqaruvi shakliga oid yondashuvlarini tahlil qilgan holda, hokimiyat tarmoqlari funksiyalari, vazifalari va vakolatlari hamda javobgarligi va bir-birini nazorat qilish darajasiga koʻra, Oʻzbekiston Respublikasi davlat boshqaruvi shaklining oʻziga xos xususiyatlari ham yoritib berilgan.
Iqtiboslar
1. Xakimov R. Davlat hokimiyati tizimida parlament: nazariya va amaliyot muammolari [Parliament in the system of state power: problems of theory and practice]. PhD thesis. Tashkent, 2009, p. 76.
2. Avakyan S. Konstitutsionnoye pravo Rossii [Constitution Law of Russia]. Moscow, TK Velby, Prospekt Publishing House, 2007, pp. 56–57.
3. Avdeev D. Rossiyskiy variant printsipa razdeleniya vlastey [Russian version of the principle of separation of powers]. Law and Politics, 2013, no. 13 (168), p. 1798.
4. Barto A. Vzaimodeystviye organov zakonodatelnoy i ispolnitel’noy vlasti v realizatsii politicheskikh reform (po materialam Krasnodarskogo kraya i Rostovskoy oblasti) [Interaction between legislative and executive authorities in the implementation of political reforms (based on the materials of the Krasnodar Territory and the Rostov Region]. Abstract of PhD dissertation. Krasnodar, 2010, p. 20.
5. Popova Yu.Yu. Organizatsionno-pravovye formy vzaimootnosheniy organov zakonodatel`noy (predstavitel`noy) i ispolnitel`noy vlasti subyektov Rossiyskoy Federatsii: na primere Dal`nevostochnogo okruga [Organizational and legal forms of relations between the legislative (representative) and executive authorities of the subjects of the Russian Federation: on the example of the Far Eastern District]. Abstract of PhD dissertation. Vladivostok, 2010, p. 8.
6. Zulfiqorov Sh. et al. Parlament va hukumatning oʻzaro munosabatlari: qiyosiy-huquqiy tahlil [The relationship between parliament and government: a comparative-legal analysis]. Tashkent, TSU Publ. House, 2015, p. 181.
7. Musayeva N. Jamiyatni demokratlashtirishda ikki palatali parlamentning ahamiyati [The role of a bicameral parliament in democratizing society]. PhD thesis. Tashkent, UzSWLU, 2007, p. 12.
8. Djumabayev K. Zakonodatel`naya i ispolnitel`naya vlasti: vzaimosvyaz` i vzaimodeystviye [Legislative and executive power: relationship and interaction]. PhD thesis. Tashkent, TSUL, 1993,
pp. 52–53.
9. Blazhich N. Modeli razdeleniya vlastey v pravovom gosudarstve [Models of separation of powers in a rule of law state]. Abstract of PhD dissertation. .Moscow, 2004, p. 18
10. The UK Parliament. Available at: https://www.parliament.uk/site-information/glossary/shadow-cabinet/.
11. Brunclik M. Patterns of Government Formation in Europe: the role of the head of state. Czech Journal of Political Science, 2015, no. 1, p. 30.
12. Strom K. Minority government and majority rule. Cambridge, Cambridge Univ. Press, 1990,
293 p.
13. Sidorov V. Dinamika koalitsionnykh pravitel`stv v parlamentskikh demokratiyakh [Dynamics of coalition governments in parliamentary democracies]. Uchenye zapiski Kazanskogo universiteta, Gumanitarnye nauki – Scientific notes of Kazan University, Humanities, 2011, vol. 153 (1), p. 192.
14. Akhmedshayeva M.A. Davlat hokimiyati tizimida ijro hokimiyati [Executive power in the system of state power]. Doctor’s degree dissertation. Tashkent, 2010, p. 111.
15. Xakimov R. Davlat hokimiyati tizimida parlament: nazariya va amaliyot muammolari [Parliament in the system of state power: problems of theory and practice]. PhD thesis. Tashkent. 2009, p. 75.
16. Tulteev I.T., Toshkanboyev U.T. Pravovoy mekhanizm vzaimodeystviya Oliy Mazhlisa i Kabineta Ministrov: sostayaniye, problemy i resheniya [Legal mechanism of interaction between the Oliy Majlis and the Cabinet of Ministers: status, problems and solutions]. Tashkent, 2014, p. 45.
17. Khutinayev I. Institut prezidenstva i problemy formy gosudarstva [Institute of presidency and problems of the form of the state]. Moscow, 1994, p. 31–32.
18. Krasnov M.A. “Neytral`naya vlast`” B. Konstana i “prezidentskiy arbitrazh” Sh. de Gollya [“Neutral power” by B. Constant and “presidential arbitration” by Charles de Gaulle]. State and Law, 2017, no. 6, pp. 60–69. EDN YSRZPF.
19. Mirakulov M. Pravovoye polozheniye Prezidenta Respubliki Uzbekistan v sisteme gosudarstvennoy vlasti [Legal status of the President of the Republic of Uzbekistan in the system of state power]. Law: history, theory, practice. Proceedings of the III Intern. scientific conf. St. Petersburg, 2015, July. St. Petersburg, Own Publ. house, 2015, p. 25.
20. Askarov Z.S. Oʻzbekiston Respublikasida milliy davlatchilik shakllanishining nazariy-huquqiy masalalari [Theoretical and legal issues of formation of national statehood in the Republic of Uzbekistan]. Abstract of PhD dissertation. Tashkent, SPbPU, 2018, p. 21.
