THE CONCEPT OF THE INSTITUTION OF TERMINATION OF A CRIMINAL CASE AND PROCEDURAL SIGNIFICANCE
Keywords:
criminal case, termination of a criminal case, responsibility, rehabilitation, release from liability termination of a criminal case on non-rehabilitating grounds, non-rehabilitating groundsAbstract
In this article, at the stage of implementation of the judicial and legal reform, on the basis of the norms of criminal and criminal procedural legislation, the concept of the institution of termination of a criminal case, its specificity, and procedural significance was formulated. The article explores the scope of this institution on the basis of the views put forward by scientists regarding the institution of termination of a criminal case. Based on the views and ideas put forward by scientists, the concept of termination of a criminal case was analyzed through scientific, theoretical, practical, and legislative norms. At the same time, the article analyzes the role and significance of the termination of a criminal case in the criminal process, its specificity, and some problems that arise in criminal procedure legislation and judicial and investigative practice. The article gives the author’s definition of the termination of a criminal case through a comparative analysis of the opinions of scientists on the termination of a criminal case, consideration on the basis of our legislation of the concepts contained in the definitions given by them. Based on the results of the analysis, relevant conclusions, proposals, and recommendations were made regarding the concept of the institution of termination of a criminal case in criminal proceedings, its specificity, and its significance in criminal and criminal procedure legislation.
References
1. Kornukov V.M. Rossiyskiy ugolovnyy protsess. Voprosy Osobennoy chasti [Russian criminal process. Issues of the Special Part: a course of lectures]. Saratov, 2010, pp. 88–89.
2. Mahmudov S. Javobgarlikka tortish muddati oʻtib ketganligi munosabati bilan jinoyat ishini tugatishning oʻziga xos xususiyatlari [Some issues of dismissal of criminal cases in connection with the expiration of the limitation period for criminal responsibility]. Lawyer Herald, 2022, Tashkent, no. 1, pp. 96–102.
3. Mahmudov S. Ayblilik toʻgʻrisidagi masalani hal qilmay turib, jinoyat ishini tugatishning ayrim jihatlari [Some aspects of the termination of a criminal case without solving culpability issue]. Lawyer Herald, 2020, Tashkent, no. 1, pp. 110–115.
4. Michurina O.V., Peretokin S.N. Obespecheniye zakonnosti i obosnovannosti prekrashheniya ugolovnogo dela [Ensuring the legality and validity of the termination of a criminal case]. Russian investigator, 2016, no. 7, p. 26.
5. Filimonov S.A. Prekrashheniye ugolovnogo dela i ugolovnogo presledovaniya po nereabilitiruyushhim osnovaniyam [Termination of a criminal case and criminal prosecution on non-rehabilitating grounds]. Abstract of PhD thesis. Krasnodar, 2009, p. 28.
6. Barabash A.S., Volodina L.M. Prekrashheniye ugolovnykh del po nereabilitiruyushhim osnovaniyam v stadii predvaritel’nogo rassledovaniya [Termination of criminal cases on non-rehabilitating grounds at the stage of preliminary investigation]. Tomsk, 1986, p. 37.
7. Dubinskiy A.Ya. Prekrashheniye ugolovnogo dela v stadii predvaritel’nogo rassledovaniya [Termination of a criminal case at the stage of preliminary investigation]. Kiev, 1975, p. 25.
8. Jogin N., Fatkullin F. Predvaritel’noye sledstviye v sovetskom ugolovnom protsesse [Preliminary investigation in the Soviet criminal process]. Moscow, 1965, p. 30.
9. Sheyfer S.A. Prekrashheniye dela v sovetskom ugolovnom protsesse [Termination of the case in the Soviet criminal process]. Abstract of PhD thesis. Moscow, 1963, p. 4.
10. Volinskaya O.V. Prekrashheniye ugolovnogo dela i ugolovnogo presledovaniya: teoreticheskiye i organizatsionno-pravovyye problemy [Termination of a criminal case and criminal prosecution: Theoretical organizational and legal problems]. Moscow, 2007, p. 57.
11. Davidova Y.V., Kibalnik A.G., Solomonenko I.G. Primireniye s poterpevshim v ugolovnom prave [Reconciliation with the victim in criminal law]. Stavropol, 2002, p. 35.
12. Bezlepkin B.T. Ugolovnyy protsess Rossii [Criminal process in Russia]. Moscow, 2008, p. 140.
13. Grinenko A.V. Ugolovnyy protsess [Criminal process]. Moscow, 2008, pp. 63–71.
14. Yakupov R.Kh. Ugolovnyy protsess [Criminal process]. Moscow, 1998, p. 322.
15. Kussmal R. Vsyakoye prekrashheniye ugolovnogo presledovaniya reabilitiruyet [Any cessation of criminal prosecution rehabilitates]. Russian justice, 2000, no. 9, pp. 45–47.
16. Murodov B.B. Jinoyat ishini tugatish institutini takomillashtirish. [Improving the institution of termination of criminal proceedings]. Abstract of Doctor’s degree dissertation. Tashkent, 2018, p. 78.
17. Kulapov V.L. Teoriya gosudarstva i prava [Theory of state and law]. Moscow, 2014,
pp. 244–245.
18. Gutsenko K.F., Golovko L.V., Filimonov B.A. Ugolovnyy protsess zapadnykh gosudarstv [The criminal process of Western states]. Moscow, 2001, p. 108.
19. Golovko L. Alternativy ugolovnomu presledovaniyu v sovremennom angliyskom prave [Alternatives to criminal prosecution in modern English law]. Jurisprudence, 1998, no. 3, pp. 108–113.
