JINOYAT ISHINI TUGATISH INSTITUTI TUSHUNCHASI VA PROTSESSUAL AHAMIYATI
Kalit so‘zlar:
jinoyat ishi, jinoyat ishini tugatish, javobgarlik, reabilitatsiya, javobgarlikdan ozod qilish, jinoyat ishini reabilitatsiya qilinmaydigan asoslar boʻyicha tugatish, reabilitatsiya qilinmaydigan asoslarAnnotatsiya
Ushbu maqolada sud-huquq islohotlarini amalga oshirish bosqichida jinoyat va jinoyat-protsessual qonunchilik normalari asosida jinoyat ishini tugatish instituti tushunchasi, uning oʻziga xos jihatlari va protsessual ahamiyati bayon etildi. Maqolada olimlar tomonidan jinoyat ishini tugatish instituti boʻyicha ilgari surilgan qarashlar orqali ushbu institutning qoʻllanish doirasi oʻrganildi. Olimlarning qarashlari va ilgari surgan gʻoyalaridan kelib chiqqan holda, jinoyat ishini tugatish tushunchasi ilmiy, nazariy, amaliy va qonunchilik normalari orqali tahlil etildi. Shu bilan birga, maqolada jinoyat ishini tugatishning jinoyat protsessida tutgan oʻrni va ahamiyati, uning oʻziga xos jihatlari, jinoyat protsessual qonunchilik va sud-tergov amaliyotida yuzaga kelayotgan ayrim muammolar tahlil etildi. Maqolada olimlarning jinoyat ishini tugatish boʻyicha bergan fikrlarini qiyosiy tahlil qilish, ularning bergan taʼriflaridagi tushunchalarni qonunchiligimizga asosan koʻrib chiqish orqali jinoyat ishini tugatish tushunchasi boʻyicha mualliflik taʼrifi berildi. Tahlil natijalari yuzasidan jinoyat protsessida jinoyat ishini tugatish institutining tushunchasi, uning oʻziga xos jihatlari hamda jinoyat va jinoyat-protsessual qonunchilikdagi ahamiyati yuzasidan tegishli xulosalar, taklif va tavsiyalar ishlab chiqildi.
Iqtiboslar
1. Kornukov V.M. Rossiyskiy ugolovnyy protsess. Voprosy Osobennoy chasti [Russian criminal process. Issues of the Special Part: a course of lectures]. Saratov, 2010, pp. 88–89.
2. Mahmudov S. Javobgarlikka tortish muddati oʻtib ketganligi munosabati bilan jinoyat ishini tugatishning oʻziga xos xususiyatlari [Some issues of dismissal of criminal cases in connection with the expiration of the limitation period for criminal responsibility]. Lawyer Herald, 2022, Tashkent, no. 1, pp. 96–102.
3. Mahmudov S. Ayblilik toʻgʻrisidagi masalani hal qilmay turib, jinoyat ishini tugatishning ayrim jihatlari [Some aspects of the termination of a criminal case without solving culpability issue]. Lawyer Herald, 2020, Tashkent, no. 1, pp. 110–115.
4. Michurina O.V., Peretokin S.N. Obespecheniye zakonnosti i obosnovannosti prekrashheniya ugolovnogo dela [Ensuring the legality and validity of the termination of a criminal case]. Russian investigator, 2016, no. 7, p. 26.
5. Filimonov S.A. Prekrashheniye ugolovnogo dela i ugolovnogo presledovaniya po nereabilitiruyushhim osnovaniyam [Termination of a criminal case and criminal prosecution on non-rehabilitating grounds]. Abstract of PhD thesis. Krasnodar, 2009, p. 28.
6. Barabash A.S., Volodina L.M. Prekrashheniye ugolovnykh del po nereabilitiruyushhim osnovaniyam v stadii predvaritel’nogo rassledovaniya [Termination of criminal cases on non-rehabilitating grounds at the stage of preliminary investigation]. Tomsk, 1986, p. 37.
7. Dubinskiy A.Ya. Prekrashheniye ugolovnogo dela v stadii predvaritel’nogo rassledovaniya [Termination of a criminal case at the stage of preliminary investigation]. Kiev, 1975, p. 25.
8. Jogin N., Fatkullin F. Predvaritel’noye sledstviye v sovetskom ugolovnom protsesse [Preliminary investigation in the Soviet criminal process]. Moscow, 1965, p. 30.
9. Sheyfer S.A. Prekrashheniye dela v sovetskom ugolovnom protsesse [Termination of the case in the Soviet criminal process]. Abstract of PhD thesis. Moscow, 1963, p. 4.
10. Volinskaya O.V. Prekrashheniye ugolovnogo dela i ugolovnogo presledovaniya: teoreticheskiye i organizatsionno-pravovyye problemy [Termination of a criminal case and criminal prosecution: Theoretical organizational and legal problems]. Moscow, 2007, p. 57.
11. Davidova Y.V., Kibalnik A.G., Solomonenko I.G. Primireniye s poterpevshim v ugolovnom prave [Reconciliation with the victim in criminal law]. Stavropol, 2002, p. 35.
12. Bezlepkin B.T. Ugolovnyy protsess Rossii [Criminal process in Russia]. Moscow, 2008, p. 140.
13. Grinenko A.V. Ugolovnyy protsess [Criminal process]. Moscow, 2008, pp. 63–71.
14. Yakupov R.Kh. Ugolovnyy protsess [Criminal process]. Moscow, 1998, p. 322.
15. Kussmal R. Vsyakoye prekrashheniye ugolovnogo presledovaniya reabilitiruyet [Any cessation of criminal prosecution rehabilitates]. Russian justice, 2000, no. 9, pp. 45–47.
16. Murodov B.B. Jinoyat ishini tugatish institutini takomillashtirish. [Improving the institution of termination of criminal proceedings]. Abstract of Doctor’s degree dissertation. Tashkent, 2018, p. 78.
17. Kulapov V.L. Teoriya gosudarstva i prava [Theory of state and law]. Moscow, 2014,
pp. 244–245.
18. Gutsenko K.F., Golovko L.V., Filimonov B.A. Ugolovnyy protsess zapadnykh gosudarstv [The criminal process of Western states]. Moscow, 2001, p. 108.
19. Golovko L. Alternativy ugolovnomu presledovaniyu v sovremennom angliyskom prave [Alternatives to criminal prosecution in modern English law]. Jurisprudence, 1998, no. 3, pp. 108–113.
