OWNERSHIP AND OTHER PROPERTY RIGHTS IN FRANCE
Keywords:
corpus iuris civilis, material right (iura in rem), personal right (iura ed rem), vindication claim, negator claim, principle of “numerus clauses”Abstract
In this scientific study, the civil law of France has been investigated according to the current French civil code. The article analyzes material rights, in particular, property rights and methods of their protection, as well as the influence of Roman law, revolutionary legislation, and norms regulating canon law, for the formation of a new bourgeois law free from feudal prohibitions and restrictions. Also, the peculiarities of French civil law, including the institutional nature of private law and dualism in law, have been analyzed. Although the legal system of the Republic of Uzbekistan is similar to the legal system of the French Republic from the point of view of the same legal family, some differences related to material law have also been analyzed, taking into account the adaptation of the law to the social life and national values of each country. In particular, the concept of the right of ownership existing in the civil legislation of our country is different in the Republic of France, and there is also a theory that such a right does not exist because even intangible things are recognized as property. In addition, it has been studied that in the Republic of France, the acquisition of property rights using the period of ownership is 30 years in relation to immovable property, with greater protection of the owner’s interests, if the factual owner is honest (good faith) and it is a factor that shortens the period.
References
1. Gordley, 1994, pp. 486–487.
2. Radonjic A. The abuse of ownership: a social justice perspective. European Property Law Journal, 2021, vol. 10, no. 2-3, pp. 263–276. DOI: 10.1515/eplj-2021-0013 SMASH/.
3. Zimmermann R. Roman Law, Contemporary Law, European Law. The Civilian Tradition Today, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2001.
4. Decree of 11 August 1789 Abolishing the Feudal System, Arts. III, IV, V, IX and XI, Lévy & Castaldo, 2002, p. 433.
5. Akkermans B. The principle of numerus clausus in European property law. Maastricht University, 2008. DOI: 10.26481/dis.20081017ba/.
6. Tomsinov V.A. Stat’i o prave sobstvennosti v grazhdanskikh kodeksakh Frantsii i Germanii [Articles on the right of ownership in the civil codes of France and Germany]. Bulletin of Moscow University, 2007, Series Right, no. 11 (2), pp.108–110.
7. Présentation de l’ordre judiciaire [Presentation of the judiciary]. Available at: http://www.justice.gouv.fr/organisation-de-la-justice-10031/lordre-judiciaire-10033/.
8. Kakourova N.A. Imushhestvo i vidoizmeneniya sobstvennosti v grazhdanskom prave Frantsii v XIX veke [Property and modifications of property in French civil law in the 19th century]. Sibirskiy yuridicheskiy vestnik – Siberian Legal Bulletin, 2010, no. 2, pp. 8–14.
9. Carbonnier 2000, p. 129, critically see Derine, 1955, pp. 42–43.
10. Koryakin V.M. Grazhdanskoye pravo zarubezhnykh stran (kurs lektsiy v skhemakh) [Civil law of foreign countries (a course of lectures in diagrams)]. Мoscow, MIIT Law Institute, 2011.
11. Zwalve W.J. Hoofdstukken uit de Geschiedenis van het Europese Privaatrecht [Chapters from the History of European Private Law]. 2nd ed. Deventer, Kluwer, 2003.
12. Zimmermann R. Europeanization of Private Law. Eds. M. Reimann & R. Zimmermann. The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Law, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2006, pp. 539–578.
13. Imomov N.F., Babajanova D.I. Xorijiy mamlakatlar fuqarolik huquqi: umumiy tavsif (ayrim mamlakatlar misolida) [Citizenship law of foreign countries: general description (on the example of some countries)]. Tashkent, TSUL, 2018, pp. 26–29.
14. Zokirov I.B. Fuqarolik huquqi [Civil rights]. Part I. Tashkent, TSUL, 2009, p. 58.
15. Long M., Weil P., Braibant G. et al. Les grands arrest de la jurispruden ce administrative [The major judgments of administrative case law]. 21st ed. Dalloz, 2017.
16. Seiller B. Droit administratif [Administrative law]. 6th ed. Flammarion, Champs University, 2016, vol. 1-2.
17. Plessis B. Droit adminstratif general [General administrative law]. Lexisnexis, 2016.
18. Yushkevich V.A. Napoleon Pervyy na poprishhe grazhdanskogo pravovedeniya i zakonodatel’stva [Napoleon the First in the field of civil jurisprudence and legislation]. Civilistic Studies: Civil Law Yearbook. Ed. B.L. Haskelberg. D.O. Tuzova. Moscow, 2006, iss. 57.
19. On Portalis see Derine 1955, p. 53 et seq.
20. Lévy & Castaldo, 2002, p. 432.
21. Zweigert & Kötz, 1998, p. 82.
22. Droits personnels and droits réels, Ketelaar, 1978, p. 18,
23. Terré & Simler, 1998, p. 107.
