THE OBJECT OF COLLECTIVE MANAGEMENT OF COPYRIGHT PROTECTION: ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND COPYRIGHT ISSUES
Keywords:
copyright, rights holders, artificial intelligence, copyright agreements, royalties, collective management, literary, artistic and artistic works, originals, use of works, performance, publication, collection of fees, distribution of fees, payment of fees, extended collective managementAbstract
The topic highlights the need and importance of a completely different type of collective management in new, high-tech fields, which applies not only to authors - members of the author’s society but also to all other authors, including unknown authors. Also, as the main object of the topic, opinions are expressed about the artificial intelligence system, which performs logical and creative functions of artificial intelligence. Artificial intelligence is very relevant in today’s information age, with the help of which humanity is opening new opportunities in science and finding solutions to global problems of the 21st century. It also increases the possibility of providing quality services in medicine, education, energy, agriculture, urban development, and all other fields. Attention is paid to some urgent problems related to the improvement of this institution, international standards for copyright protection, and comparative legal analysis of national legislation, as well as the opinions of scientists from Uzbekistan and other different countries. Suggestions and recommendations were put forward of scientific and practical importance for national copyright law. Also, based on the results of the analysis of the scientific views of scholars on intellectual property law, the definition of methods of implementation of copyright and related rights on the basis of “extended collective management” and its effectiveness, the effectiveness of these rights and “agency-type collective management”, the special rules and principles of intellectual property law have been studied on a scientific basis.
References
1. An act to amend and consolidate the acts respecting copyright. Available at: https://www.copyright.gov/history/1909act.pdf/.
2. Cf. Burrow-Giles Lithographic Co. v. Sarony. U.S. 53, 1884, p. 111.
3. Legal protection for all photographs was eventually made a part of the U.S. Copyright Act. U.S.C., 2012, para 106A, p. 17.
4. Computer Software Copyright Act, Pub. L. No. 96-517, para 117, 94 Stat. 3028, 1980, codified at 17 U.S.C., para 117, 1988.
6. World Intellectual Property Indicators. WIPO, 2019. Available at: https://www.wipo.int/publications/en/detSIls.jsp?id=4464/ (accessed 26.01.2021).
7. Feist Publications v. Rural Telephone Service Company, Inc., 499 U.S. 340. 1991.
8. Compendium of U.S. Copyright Office Practices. 306 The Human Authorship Requirement, Chapter 300. Available at: https://www.copyright.gov/comp3/chap300/ch300-copyrightable-authorship.pdf/ (accessed 26.01.2021).
9. Yakubov O. Significance and principles of the trips agreement in the legal system of world trade organization agreements. The Peerian Journal, 2022, vol. 9, pp. 65–69.
10. Zyatiskiy S. Problemy realizatsii avtorskikh i smezhnykh prav na kollektivnoy osnove v usloviyakh razvitiya novykh tekhnologiy [Problems of implementation of copyright and related rights on a collective basis in the context of the development of new technologies]. Moscow. 2003, pp. 27–38.
4. Gavrilov E.P. Pravo intellektual’noy sobstvennosti. Avtorskoe pravo i smezhnyye prava. XXI vek [Intellectual property right. Copyright and related rights. XXI century]. Moscow, Yurservitum, 2016, pp. 425–446.
5. Yakubov O. Trade organization agreements: the main principles of trips agreement. Conferencea. 2022, pp. 119–123.
6. Nasriev I.I. Muallifning shaxsiy huquqlarini himoyalash [Protection of the non-property rights]. Tashkent, Mehnat Publ., 2003, pp. 45–57.
7. Yakubova I.B. Oʻzbekistonda mualliflik huquqi boʻyicha mulkiy huquqlarni jamoaviy boshqaruv tashkilotlarining vujudga kelishi va rivojlanishi [Emergence and development of organizations of collective management of copyright property rights in Uzbekistan]. Jurisprudence, 2021, no. 6, pp. 66–74.
10. Leanovich E.B. Problemy pravovogo regulirovaniya internet-otnosheniy s inostrannim elementom [Problems of legal regulation of Internet relations with a foreign element]. Available at: http://www.evolution.info/.
11. Yakubova I.B. Pravo na zhizn’ – neotyemlemaya chast’ lichnogo neimushestvennogo prava [The right to life is an integral part of a personal non-property right]. Issues of modern jurisprudence, 2016, no. 12 (62).
12. Xudayberdiyeva G.A. Turdosh huquqlarni fuqarolik-huquqiy himoya qilish muammolari [Problems of civil law protection of related rights]. Tashkent, 2006.
13. Yakubova I. Ponimaniye kollektivnogo upravleniya avtorskimi pravami v istoricheskom kontekste [Understanding Collective Copyright Management in a Historical Context]. Yurist Axborotnomasi – Legal Bulletin, 2020, no. 1 (6), pp. 76–80. Available at: https://www.yuristjournal.uz/index.php/lawyer-herald/article/view/144/119/.
14. Oqyulov O. Intellektual mulkning huquqiy maqomi [Legal status of intellectual property]. Tashkent, 2000, pp. 36–45.
15. Stanieri A., Zeleznikow J., Gawler M., Lewis B. A hybrid-neutral approach to automation of legal reasoning in the discretionary domain of family law in Australia. Artificial intelligence and law, 1999, no. 7 (2-3), pp. 127–132.
16. Brams S.J., Taylor A.D. Fair division from cake cutting to dispute resolution. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. 1996, pp. 48–52.
17.Yakubova I., Yakubov A. Problems of copyright protection: plagiary and piracy on the Internet. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education (TURCOMAT), 2021, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 1132–1135. DOI: 10.17762/turcomat.v12i4.625/.
18. Vaynke V. Avtorskoye pravo: reglamentatsiya, osnovy, budushcheye [Copyright: regulations, fundamentals, future]. Moscow, Denmark, 1979, p. 97.
