THE ROLE OF AVATARS IN CYBERSPACE AS AN OBJECT OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY

Authors

Keywords:

cyberspace, avatars, digital world, communication, social network, internet

Abstract

This article discusses cyberspace in detail, its appearance, the basics of development, and aspects related to interaction with social networks. A scientific analysis of the legal regulation of maintaining order in cyberspace was carried out, and its legal nature and scientists’ reviews of cyberspace were analysed. Special emphasis is paid to avatars, which are considered means of social relations in cyberspace, their concept, essence, and significance of content, and new objects of social relations in cyberspace. The article reflects the characteristics of avatars associated with the virtual world, cyberspace in general, and the opinions and recommendations of scientists in this regard. There was also a scientific analysis of the characteristics of avatars associated with cyberspace, as well as the limits and methods of their legitimate use. In this regard, statistical materials conducted by scientists were also cited. Protection, order, types, and methods of intangible benefits are distinguished in cyberspace. Alternatively, the fact that avatars are the result of intellectual activity, and considered objects of intellectual property, scientific definitions given by mature scientists as their basis are analyzed, in addition, the calculation of avatars as objects of intellectual property is studied on the basis of international and national norms. In cyberspace, opinions were expressed on the need to create a mechanism aimed at the direct regulation of avatars as an object of intellectual property, as well as the further development of digital law in this regard.

References

1. Ochoa T.T. Who Owns an Avatar? Copyright, Creativity, and Virtual Worlds, Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment and Technology Law, 2020, no. 14, p. 961.

2. Rassolov I.M. Pravo i kiberneticheskoye prostranstvo [Law and cybernetic space]. 2nd ed. Moscow, 2016, 232 p.

3. Gibson W. Neuromancer. New York, Berkeley Publishing Group, 1984, p. 51.

4. Dobrinskaya D.Ye. Moscow, MGU.

5. Berkman J.N., Berkman L.R. The Laws of Cyberspac. 1999, p. 32.

6. Yefemova L.G. Vidy pravootnosheniy, voznikayushchikh na platforme v Blockchain [Types of legal relations that appear on Blockchain platforms]. Moscow.

7. Vylyeva D.S. Avatar kak individualnyy vybor sredstva samoidentifikatsii [Avatar as an individual choice of means of self-identification]. Scientific and technical statements of St. Petersburg State Pedagogical University, Humanitarian and social sciences.

8. Ahn S.J.-G. Avatars. University of Georgia, 2011, p. 5.

9. Belisle J.-F., Onur B.H. Avatars as information: Perception of consumers based on their avatars in virtual worlds. Psychology & Marketing, 2010, vol. 27, iss. 8, pp. 741–765.

10. Antonova Yu.A., Demina S.A. Avatar kak element samoprezentatsii v sotsialnoy seti [Avatar as an element of self-presentation in a social network]. Lingvokulturology, 2010, no. 4, pp. 15–20

11. Pyatkov D.V., Pyatkova M.D., Serebryakov A.A. Pravovyye problemy ispol’zovaniya chuzhikh proizvedeniy iskusstva dlya oformleniya akkaunta v sotsial’nykh setyakh [Legal problems of using other people’s works of art to create an account on social networks]. DOI: 10.14258/ralj(2022)2.6/.

12. Oqyulov O. Intellektual mulk huquqi [Intellectual property rights]. Tashkent, 2005, pp. 17–20.

13. Zokirov I.B. Fuqarolik huquqi [Civil rights]. TSUL, 2009, p. 71.

14. Oqyulov O., Egamberdiyev E., Baratov M.X., Kuldashev N.A et al. Fuqarolik va oila huquqi [Civil and family law]. Tashkent, 2022, 278 p.

15. Intellektual mulk huquqi: rivojlanish istiqbollari [Intellectual property rights: development prospects]. Ed. A. Gafurov. Tashkent, Adolat Publ., 2012, p. 172.

16. Wu J. Choosing My Avatar & the Psychology of Virtual Worlds: What Matters? Kaleidoscope, 2013, vol. 11, Article 89.

17. Zaytseva Yu.Ye. Obraz samoprezentatsii (avatara) kak faktor formirovaniya pervichnogo doveriya-nedoveriya k sub’’yektu internet-kommunikatsii [Image of self-presentation (avatar) as a factor of primary trust/distrust in Internet communication]. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo Universiteta – Bulletin of St. Petersburg University, 2012, pp. 134–143.

18. Antonova Yu.A., Demina S.A. Avatar as an element of self-presentation in a social network. 2010, no. 4, pp. 15–20.

Downloads

Published

2026-02-18

How to Cite

THE ROLE OF AVATARS IN CYBERSPACE AS AN OBJECT OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY. (2026). JURISPRUDENCE, 2(6), 107-115. https://yurisprudensiya.tsul.uz/index.php/yurisprudensiya/article/view/497