CAUSES OF CORRUPTION AND DEMOCRATIC SOLUTIONS
Keywords:
public administration, transparency, public oversight, democratic institutions, corruption risks, bureaucracyAbstract
This article analyzes foreign research on corruption and discusses in detail the negative impact of corruption processes and the risks arising from them on democratic institutions and socio-economic development in developing countries. In the course of the study, such factors as corruption, market and systemic forms of corruption, weak political mechanisms, excessive bureaucratic barriers, and economic inequality that give rise to them are compared and critically examined. At the same time, the article reveals the complex interrelationship between corruption and development, emphasizing that corruption is a destructive force undermining the foundations of a democratic society. In addition, the active participation of the population, the principles of openness, and the integrity of civil servants are indicated as the main factors in reducing corruption. The study criticizes the ineffectiveness of approaches based solely on punishment and emphasizes the need to support systemic reforms aimed at eradicating the root cause of the problem. In particular, using the example of the Hong Kong ICAC organization, effective anti-corruption mechanisms and their practical results are considered, and it is noted that in reducing corruption risks, reforming institutional shortcomings in management systems is more important than the state’s purely punitive function. The delicate and problematic relationship between democracy and corruption is also analyzed, and special emphasis is placed on the strengthening of corruption risks as a result of the weakening of democratic institutions and the failure of control mechanisms.
References
Ahmadjonov, M. (2024). Korrupsiyaga qarshi kurashish va muvofiqlik nazorati: yuristlar va huquq fakulteti talabalari orasida huquqiy savodxonlik [Anti-corruption and compliance control: Legal awareness among lawyers and law students]. International Journal of Law and Policy, (8), 52–67. https://doi.org/10.59022/ijlp.145
Alkhodary, A., & Saidat, Z. (2023). The impact of e-government on corporate performance: A case study of Jordanian companies. Information Sciences Letters, (26), 52–63. https://doi.org/10.30525/2256-0742/2021-7-5-235-242
AllahRakha, N. (2023). Sun’iy intellekt (AI)ning biznesga ta’siri va uning regulyatorlik muammolari [The impact of artificial intelligence on business and its regulatory challenges]. International Journal of Law and Policy, (1), 25–48. https://doi.org/10.59022/ijlp.23
AllahRakha, N. (2024). Global perspectives on cybercrime legislation. Journal of Infrastructure, Policy and Development, (8), 106–131. https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd.v8i10.6007
Aritonang, D. M. (2019). The impact of e-government systems on public service quality in Indonesia. European Scientific Journal, (13), 23–36. https://doi.org/10.19044/esj.2017.v13n35p99
Bakhramova, M. (2022). Onlayn arbitraj uchun huquqiy asoslarni uyg‘unlashtirish [Harmonization of legal frameworks for online arbitration]. International Journal of Law and Policy, (13), 22–35. https://doi.org/10.59022/ijlp.154
Cardellini, L. (2023). Sovereignty beyond borders: Uncovering the interaction between airspace and outer space. International Journal of Law and Policy, (9), 28–45. https://doi.org/10.59022/ijlp.201
Carter, L., & Bélanger, F. (2020). The utilization of e-government services: Citizen trust, innovation, and acceptance factors. Information Systems Journal, (15), 48–71. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2575.2005.00183.x
Carter, L., & Yoon, E. (2023). Analyzing e-government design research artifacts: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Information Management, 64, 102430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102430
Fazekas, M., & King, L. P. (2019). Risks of development funds: EU funds and grand corruption in Central and Eastern Europe. Regulation & Governance, (17), 52–73. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12184
Gonçalves de Godoi, C. E. (2020). The importance of transparency in combating corruption in public procurement in Brazil. Mexican Bulletin of Comparative Law, (13), 11–22. https://doi.org/10.22201/iij.24484873e.201912
Heydari, M., & Saeidi, K. (2022). Corruption and infrastructure development based on stochastic analysis. Archives for Technical Sciences, (22), 37–51. https://doi.org/10.59456/afts.2022.1528.011
Hoa, N. T., & Thanh, N. N. (2023). Factors affecting corruption in the public sector: The case of Vietnam. Journal of Liberty and International Affairs, (19), 33–47. https://doi.org/10.47305/JLIA2392063
Marcelline, S. (2023). Examining the impact of e-government on corporate social responsibility: Mediation through mandatory CSR policy, corruption, and ICT development during COVID. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 737100. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.737100
OECD. (2022). Collusion and corruption in public procurement. https://www.oecd.org/daf/competition/46235884
Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe. (2023). Prevention of corruption act in Slovenia and Hong Kong. https://pace.coe.int/files/11673/html
Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe. (2024). Promoting integrity in the
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 JURISPRUDENCE

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.



