KORRUPSIYANING SABABLARI VA DEMOKRATIK YECHIMLAR
Kalit so‘zlar:
davlat boshqaruvi, shaffoflik, jamoatchilik nazorati, demokratik institutlar, korrupsion xavf-xatarlar, byurokratiyaAnnotatsiya
Ushbu maqolada korrupsiya boʻyicha amalga oshirilgan xorijiy tadqiqotlar tahlil qilinib, korrupsiyaviy jarayonlar va ulardan kelib chiqadigan xavf-xatarlarning rivojlanayotgan mamlakatlarda demokratik institutlar hamda ijtimoiy-iqtisodiy rivojlanishga koʻrsatadigan salbiy taʼsiri batafsil muhokama qilinadi. Tadqiqot davomida korrupsiyaning poraxoʻrlik, bozor va tizimli shakllari oʻzaro taqqoslanib, ularni vujudga keltiruvchi zaif siyosiy mexanizmlar, haddan tashqari byurokratik toʻsiqlar hamda iqtisodiy tengsizlik kabi omillar tanqidiy yondashuvda yoritiladi. Shu bilan birga, maqolada korrupsiya va taraqqiyot oʻrtasidagi murakkab oʻzaro bogʻliqlik ochib berilib, korrupsiya demokratik jamiyatning asoslarini yemiruvchi kuch ekaniga alohida urgʻu beriladi. Shuningdek, korrupsiyani kamaytirishda aholining faol ishtiroki, ochiqlik tamoyillari hamda davlat xizmatchilarining halolligi asosiy omillar sifatida koʻrsatib oʻtiladi. Tadqiqotda faqat jazoga tayangan yondashuvlar samarasizligi tanqid qilinib, muammoning ildizini yoʻqotishga qaratilgan tizimli islohotlarni qoʻllab-quvvatlash zarurligi taʼkidlanadi. Xususan, Gonkongning ICAC tashkiloti misolida korrupsiyaga qarshi kurashishning samarali mexanizmlari va ularning amaliy natijalari koʻrib chiqiladi hamda korrupsiya xavfini kamaytirishda davlatning faqat jazolovchi funksiyasidan koʻra boshqaruv tizimlaridagi institutsional kamchiliklarni isloh qilish muhimroq ekani qayd etiladi. Demokratiya va korrupsiya oʻrtasidagi nozik va muammoli munosabatlar ham tahlil qilingan boʻlib, demokratik institutlar zaiflashuvi hamda nazorat mexanizmlarining ishlamasligi natijasida korrupsion xavf-xatarlarning kuchayishiga alohida urgʻu berilgan.
Iqtiboslar
Ahmadjonov, M. (2024). Korrupsiyaga qarshi kurashish va muvofiqlik nazorati: yuristlar va huquq fakulteti talabalari orasida huquqiy savodxonlik [Anti-corruption and compliance control: Legal awareness among lawyers and law students]. International Journal of Law and Policy, (8), 52–67. https://doi.org/10.59022/ijlp.145
Alkhodary, A., & Saidat, Z. (2023). The impact of e-government on corporate performance: A case study of Jordanian companies. Information Sciences Letters, (26), 52–63. https://doi.org/10.30525/2256-0742/2021-7-5-235-242
AllahRakha, N. (2023). Sun’iy intellekt (AI)ning biznesga ta’siri va uning regulyatorlik muammolari [The impact of artificial intelligence on business and its regulatory challenges]. International Journal of Law and Policy, (1), 25–48. https://doi.org/10.59022/ijlp.23
AllahRakha, N. (2024). Global perspectives on cybercrime legislation. Journal of Infrastructure, Policy and Development, (8), 106–131. https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd.v8i10.6007
Aritonang, D. M. (2019). The impact of e-government systems on public service quality in Indonesia. European Scientific Journal, (13), 23–36. https://doi.org/10.19044/esj.2017.v13n35p99
Bakhramova, M. (2022). Onlayn arbitraj uchun huquqiy asoslarni uyg‘unlashtirish [Harmonization of legal frameworks for online arbitration]. International Journal of Law and Policy, (13), 22–35. https://doi.org/10.59022/ijlp.154
Cardellini, L. (2023). Sovereignty beyond borders: Uncovering the interaction between airspace and outer space. International Journal of Law and Policy, (9), 28–45. https://doi.org/10.59022/ijlp.201
Carter, L., & Bélanger, F. (2020). The utilization of e-government services: Citizen trust, innovation, and acceptance factors. Information Systems Journal, (15), 48–71. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2575.2005.00183.x
Carter, L., & Yoon, E. (2023). Analyzing e-government design research artifacts: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Information Management, 64, 102430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102430
Fazekas, M., & King, L. P. (2019). Risks of development funds: EU funds and grand corruption in Central and Eastern Europe. Regulation & Governance, (17), 52–73. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12184
Gonçalves de Godoi, C. E. (2020). The importance of transparency in combating corruption in public procurement in Brazil. Mexican Bulletin of Comparative Law, (13), 11–22. https://doi.org/10.22201/iij.24484873e.201912
Heydari, M., & Saeidi, K. (2022). Corruption and infrastructure development based on stochastic analysis. Archives for Technical Sciences, (22), 37–51. https://doi.org/10.59456/afts.2022.1528.011
Hoa, N. T., & Thanh, N. N. (2023). Factors affecting corruption in the public sector: The case of Vietnam. Journal of Liberty and International Affairs, (19), 33–47. https://doi.org/10.47305/JLIA2392063
Marcelline, S. (2023). Examining the impact of e-government on corporate social responsibility: Mediation through mandatory CSR policy, corruption, and ICT development during COVID. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 737100. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.737100
OECD. (2022). Collusion and corruption in public procurement. https://www.oecd.org/daf/competition/46235884
Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe. (2023). Prevention of corruption act in Slovenia and Hong Kong. https://pace.coe.int/files/11673/html
Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe. (2024). Promoting integrity in the
Yuklab Olishlar
Nashr qilingan
Son
Bo‘lim
Litsenziya
Mualliflik huquqi (c) 2026 YURISPRUDENSIYA
Ushbu ish Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ostida litsenziyalangan.
