CRIMINAL-LEGAL PROBLEMS OF DIFFERENTIATING CRIMINAL LIABILITY FOR CRIMES COMMITTED DUE TO NEGLIGENCE: A COMPARATIVE-LEGAL ANALYSIS OF GERMAN AND FRENCH CRIMINAL LEGISLATION

Authors

Keywords:

carelessness, self-confidence, negligence, harm, action, inaction, socially dangerous consequence, objective criterion, subjective criterion, factual error

Abstract

This article analyzes the criminal-legal nature of crimes committed through negligence, the historical development of the negligent form of guilt, the criteria for distinguishing between self-confidence and negligence, as well as the problems of qualifying crimes related to death resulting from negligence. The article highlighted the issue of single criminal consequences arising from man-made hazards, professional activities, particularly in the medical field, complex technical systems, and the joint careless actions or omissions of several individuals. Based on the comparative legal analysis, proposals were put forward aimed at improving the norms of criminal legislation on causing harm through negligence, clarifying professional standards, and developing criteria that should be taken into account in the legal assessment of the subjective side, which is one of the elements of the crime in investigative and judicial practice.

References

Beck, U. (2022). Risikogesellschaft. Auf dem Weg in eine andere Moderne [Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity] (25th ed.). Suhrkamp Verlag.

Dagel, P. S. (1977). Neostorozhnost: ugolovno-pravovye i kriminologicheskie problemy [Negligence: Criminal law and criminological problems]. Legal Literature.

Federal Republic of Germany. (1998, November 13). Strafgesetzbuch (StGB) [Criminal Code]. Laws on the Internet. https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/stgb/

Fletcher, G. P. (1998). Basic concepts of criminal law. Oxford University Press.

French Republic. (1992). Code pénal de la République française [Criminal Code of the French Republic]. Légifrance. https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/codes/id/LEGITEXT000006070719/

French Republic. (2000, July 10). Loi n° 2000-647 du 10 juillet 2000 tendant à préciser la définition des délits non intentionnels [Law No. 2000-647 of July 10, 2000, clarifying the definition of unintentional offenses]. Journal officiel de la République française, (159).

Jescheck, H.-H., & Weigend, T. (1996). Lehrbuch des Strafrechts. Allgemeiner Teil [Textbook of criminal law: General part] (4th ed.). Duncker & Humblot.

JuraFuchs. (n.d.). Bedingter Vorsatz: Ernstnahmetheorie (§ 15 StGB) [Conditional intent: Seriousness-of-acceptance theory (§ 15 German Criminal Code)]. https://wissen.jurafuchs.de/definitionen/jqvzw7z/vorsatz-bedingter-ernstnahmetheorie-%C2%A7-15-stgb

Kudryavtsev, V. N. (2004). Obshchaya teoriya kvalifikatsii prestupleniy [General theory of the qualification of crimes] (4th ed.). Lawyer.

Kursaev, A. V. (2015). Preduprezhdenie neostorozhnyh prestupleniy i mery ugolovnoy repressii [Prevention of negligent crimes and criminal penalty measures]. Bulletin of the Moscow University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia, (5). https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/preduprezhdenie-neostorozhnyh-prestupleniy-i-mery-ugolovnoy-repressii

Kvashis, V. E. (1986). Prestupnaya neostorozhnost: sotsialno-pravovye i kriminologicheskie problemy [Criminal negligence: Social-legal and criminological problems]. Far Eastern University.

Nersesyan, V. A. (2002). Otvetstvennost za neostorozhnye prestupleniya [Liability for crimes committed through negligence]. Legal Center Press.

Pop District Criminal Court. (2026, June 4). Criminal case No. 1-1606-2602/201. Supreme Court of the Republic of Uzbekistan Public Portal. https://public.sud.uz/

Pradel, J. (2019). Droit pénal général [General criminal law] (22nd ed.). Éditions Cujas.

Rarog, A. I. (2002). Kvalifikatsiya prestupleniy po subyektivnym priznakam [Qualification of crimes based on subjective elements]. Legal Center Press.

Roxin, C. (2006). Strafrecht. Allgemeiner Teil: Band I: Grundlagen. Der Aufbau der Verbrechenslehre [Criminal law: General part: Volume I: Foundations. The structure of the doctrine of crime] (4th ed.). C.H. Beck.

Tyazhkova, I. M. (2002). Neostorozhnye prestupleniya s ispolzovaniem istochnikov povyshennoy opasnosti [Negligent crimes involving sources of increased danger]. Legal Center Press.

Wikipedia. (2026). Gradatsiya [Gradation]. https://uz.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gradatsiya

Downloads

Published

2026-08-28

How to Cite

CRIMINAL-LEGAL PROBLEMS OF DIFFERENTIATING CRIMINAL LIABILITY FOR CRIMES COMMITTED DUE TO NEGLIGENCE: A COMPARATIVE-LEGAL ANALYSIS OF GERMAN AND FRENCH CRIMINAL LEGISLATION. (2026). JURISPRUDENCE, 6(4), 185-191. https://yurisprudensiya.tsul.uz/index.php/yurisprudensiya/article/view/796