ANALYSIS OF PROBLEMS RELATED TO APPOINTMENT AND CONDUCT OF ECONOMIC EXPERTISE

Abstract

This article analyzes the current problems of appointing and conducting economic examinations in criminal proceedings and their solutions. The study examines important issues such as the lack of a unified classification of economic examinations, the problem of subjectivity in appointing examinations, insufficient experience and skills of experts, insufficient necessary documents for conducting examinations, imperfect methodologies, the issue of expert independence, examination timeframes, and the quality of conclusions. The article provides recommendations for improving legislation, enhancing expert qualifications, implementing modern technologies, studying, and applying international experience to address these problems. Issues of evaluating expert conclusions, verifying digital evidence, storing, and ensuring the safety of examination objects are also studied. Based on the research results, practical recommendations are given for developing and legislatively establishing a unified classification of all types of economic examinations, using specialist consultations when appointing examinations, organizing mandatory webinars and courses for young specialists, organizing special training courses to improve the economic knowledge of investigators and inquirers, and developing detailed methodological manuals for all types of economic examinations. The proposals and recommendations presented in the article serve to improve the quality and efficiency of economic examinations and, ultimately, to increase the effectiveness of combating economic crimes.