Improving the emergence and protection of civil rights and obligations
Keywords:
civil law, obligation, protection, legal fact, the decision of the meeting, political law, property law, damage, lost profit, self-defenseAbstract
This article analyzes the formation and protection of civil rights and duties based on the Concept of improving the civil legislation of the Republic of Uzbekistan, approved by the Decree of the President of the Republic of Uzbekistan No F-5464 dated April 5, 2019. It analyzes the legal nature of the decisions of the meeting as a basis for the formation of civil rights and duties, their place and essence as a legal fact based on foreign law, and substantiates proposals to include provisions on the decisions of the meeting in the new edition. The rules on the independence of civil rights from political rights were also analyzed in terms of their impact on the emergence of civil rights and duties, and the idea of including them in the new edition of the Civil Code was put forward. In addition, this article analyzes the issue of including in the FC the norm of the right of a person to the protection of his civil rights in case of violation, non-recognition, or conflict. In addition, the article examines the conditions, criteria, and limits of self-protection of the individual to the FC, and argues that the new requirements in this regard should be reflected in the legislation. The issue of defining the rules for the institution of lost profits in the protection of civil rights is also relevant today, and it is necessary to establish clear conditions for determining the existence and amount of lost profits. At the same time, the rules on compensation for damages caused by state bodies and officials in the protection of civil rights are also relevant today, as they are regulated on the basis of modern realities.
References
1. Krivusheva S.S. Resheniya sobraniy kak yuridicheskiye fakti v rossiyskom grajdanskom prave [Assembly Decisions as Legal Facts in Russian Civil Law]. Abstract of PhD dissertation. Yekaterinburg, 2018.
2. Krasheninnikov Ye.A., Baygushev Y.V. Odnostoronniye i mnogostoronniye sdelki [Unilateral and multilateral transactions]. Vestnik VAS RF – Bulletin of the Supreme Arbitration Court of the Russian Federation, 2012, no. 7. Available at: https://center-bereg.ru/b3355.html/.
3. Andreyev V.K. Resheniya sobraniy [Meeting decisions]. Sivilist – Sivilion, 2013, no. 3, pp. 63-72.
4. Yegorov A.V. Zakon i praktika: ot bor’bi k yedinstvu [Law and practice: from struggle to unity]. EJ-Yurist, 2004, no. 3.
5. Gesellschaftsrecht [Company law]. Von Hueck, 2003, p. 145.
6. Wolf M. Allgemeiner Teil des Rechts von Dr. Karl Larenz [General part of the law of Dr. Karl Larenz]. Revised. and ext. Ed., 2004, pp. 406–408.
7. Brox H. Allgemeiner Teil des BGB [General part of the Civil Code]. Revised. ed. Berlin, 1999, p. 56.
8. Grundriss des Rechts: Band I. Auf Grundlage der von Dr. Helmut Koziol und Dr. Rudolf Welser [Outline of Law: Based on Dr. Helmut Koziol and Dr. Rudolph Welser]. 13 ed. Vienna, 2006, vol. 1, p. 114.
9. Suleymenov M.K. Grajdanskoye pravo i obespecheniye prav lichnosti v sovremennykh usloviyakh [Civil law and ensuring the rights of the individual in modern conditions]. Vestnik Instituta zakonodatelstva RK – Bulletin of the Institute of Legislation of the Republic of Kazakhstan, 2017, no. 1, p. 84.
10. Grazhdansko-pravovaya zashhita imushhestvennykh prav subyektov grazhdanskikh pravootnosheniy [Civil legal protection of property rights of subjects of civil legal relations]. Ed.
V.P. Kutinoy. St. Petersburg, Publishing house of St. Petersburg University of Management and Economics, 2014, p. 148.
11. Izmaylova Ye.V. Zashhita grazhdanskikh prav: podhody k ponimaniyu [Civil Rights Protection: Approaches to Understanding]. Zhurnal o prave – Law Journal, 2018, no. 2.
12. Bogdanov D.Ye. Analiz pravovykh podhodov k vozmeshheniyu chistykh ekonomicheskikh poter‘ v zarubezhnom prave [Analysis of legal approaches to compensation for net economic losses in foreign law]. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/analiz-pravovyh-podhodov-k-vozmescheniyu-chistyh-ekonomicheskih-poter-v-zarubezhnom-prave/.
13. Grajdanskiy Ulojeniye Germanii [Civil Code of Germany]. Available at: http://oceanlaw.ru/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/1900 -1.pdf/.
14. Grajdanskiy kodeks Gruzii [Civil Code of Georgia]. Available at: https://matsne.gov.ge/ru/document/view/31702?publication=117/.
15. Shevtsov S.G. Conceptual basis for determination of limits of free discretion for the subjects of civil relations. Defects in Russian legislation, 2012, no. 3, pp. 82–86.
16. Grajdanskiy kodeksi Ukraini [Civil Code of Ukraine]. Available at: https://urst.com.ua/ru/act/gku/.
17. Van Boom W.H. Pure Economic Loss. A Comparative Perspective. Pure Economic Loss. Wien, N.Y., 2004.
18. Palandt. Buergerliches Gesetzbuch [Civil Code]. Revised ed. Publisher C.H. Beck, Munich, 1998, p. 288.
19. Markesinis B.S., Unberath H. The German Law of Torts: A Comparative Treatise. 4th ed. Oxford, 2002.
20. Shemelev K.S. K voprosu o vozmeshhenii ubytkov, prichinyonnykh gosudarstvennymi organami i organami mestnogo samoupravleniya kak mery grazhdansko-pravovoy otvetstvennosti [On the issue of compensation for losses caused by state bodies and local governments as a measure of civil liability]. Available at: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=25644340/.
21. Kuldashev N.A. Ichki ishlar organlari delikt munosabatlar subyekti sifatida [The law enforcement agencies as a subject of tort relations]. Abstract of Doctor’s degree dissertation. Tashkent, 2021, p. 30.
