THEORETICAL AND PRACTICAL ASPECTS OF THE LAST NECESSITY
Keywords:
Last necessity, damage, crime, responsibility, punishment, fault, measure, risk, prevention, eliminationAbstract
This article analyzes the theoretical and practical aspects of the last necessity and its characteristics. In cases of last necessity, if the danger can be prevented by other means or if the stated damage exceeds the prevented damage, such damage to the rights and interests protected by law is considered to be a deviation from the limit of the last necessity and its specific features. Also, in the article, the author considers the following to be committed in the case of last necessity: first, damage to social relations protected by law due to last necessity; second, the last necessity is applied only during the time when the danger has begun and has not ended, and that it is not possible to apply the last necessity measure to the danger that has not yet begun and ended; third, it was not possible to eliminate the danger through any other measure and the used measure should be the last measure to eliminate the danger; fourth, the damage caused by the last necessity is less than the damage that can be caused by the source of danger; fifth, it analyzes whether it is possible to establish signs within the framework of the law, that is, not to deviate from the limits of the last necessity, with the ideas and opinions of researchers.
References
1. Jinoyat huquqi [Criminal law]. Tashkent, Academy of the Ministry of Internal Affairs, 2012,
p. 349.
2. Sidorenko E.L. Otritsatel’noye povedeniye poterpevshego i ugolovnyy zakon [Negative behavior and criminal law]. St. Petersburg, Yuridicheskiy tsentr Press, 2003, p. 310.
3. Domakhin S.A. Kraynyaya neobkhodimost’ po sovetskomu ugolovnomu pravu [Urgent necessity according to Soviet criminal law]. Мoscow, 1955.
4. Kozak V.I. Voprosy teorii i praktiki krayney neobkhodimosti [Questions of theory and practice of extreme necessity]. Saratov, 1981.
5. Entsiklopediya gosudarstva i prava [Encyclopedia of State and Law]. Ed. P.I. Stuchki. Moscow, Communist Academy, 1930, vol. 2, p. 423.
6. Naumov A.V. Rossiyskoye ugolovnoye pravo [Russian criminal law]. Moscow, Bek, 1996, p. 347.
7. Gegel’ G.V.F. Filosofiya prava [Philosophy of law]. Moscow, 1990, p. 171.
8. Nemirovskiy E. YA. Uchebnik ugolovnogo prava [Textbook of criminal law]. Odessa, 1919, p. 167.
9. Vinokurov V.V. Pravomernoye prichineniye vreda v sostoyanii krayney neobkhodimosti [Lawful infliction of harm in a state of emergency]. Krasnoyarsk, Siberian institute of law of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia, 2001, p. 66.
10. Aleshina E.A. Nekotoryye problemy primeneniya ugolovnogo zakonodatelstva, obespechivayushchego pravo lits na deystviya v sostoyanii krayney neobkhodimosti [Some problems of the application of criminal legislation that ensures the right of persons to act in a state of emergency]. Actual Problems of Russian Law, 2007, no. 2, p. 319.
11. Khametdinova G.F. Ugolovno-pravovaya kharakteristika krayney neobkhodimosti [Criminal-legal characteristic of extreme necessity]. PhD thesis, 2007, p. 19.
12. Usmonaliyev M. Jinoyat huquqi [Criminal law]. Tashkent, Jangi asr avlodi Publ., 2005,
pp. 355–356.
13. Antonov V.F. Kraynyaya neobkhodimost’ v ugolovnom prave [Urgent Necessity in Criminal Law]. Moscow, Uniti-Dana Publ., 2005, p. 60.
14. Rustamboyev M.X. Oʻzbekiston Respublikasi jinoyat huquqi kursi [Course of criminal law of the Republic of Uzbekistan]. Doctrine of crime. Tashkent, Ilm Ziyo Publ., 2010., vol. 1, p. 355.
15. Baulin YU.V. Obstoyatel’stva, isklyuchayushchiye prestupnost’ deyaniya [Circumstances excluding the criminality of the act]. Harkov, 1991, p. 308.
16. Pleshakov A.M., Shkabin G.S. Kraynyaya neobkhodimost’ kak obstoyatel’stvo, isklyuchayushcheye prestupnost’ deyaniya [Urgent necessity as a circumstance excluding the wrongfulness of an act]. Ryazan, 2005, p. 24.
17. Lysak N.V. Kraynyaya neobkhodimost’ [ Emergency]. Investigator, 1998, no. 6, p. 22.
18. Sidorov B. V. Ugolovno-pravovyye garantii pravomernogo, sotsial’no-poleznogo povedeniya [Criminal legal guarantees of lawful, socially useful behavior]. Kazan, Publishing House of Kazan University, 1992, p. 79.
19. Orekhov V.V. Neobkhodimaya oborona i inyye obstoyatel’stva, isklyuchayushchiye prestupnost’ deyaniya [Necessary defense and other promises excluding the criminality of the act]. St. Petersburg, Juridicheskiy tsenter Press, 2003, p. 130.
20. Kadnikov N.G. Obstoyatel’stva, isklyuchayushchiye prestupnost’ deyaniya [Circumstances excluding the criminality of the act]. Moscow, 1998, p. 25.
21. Niyozova S.S. Legal conditions for the lawfulness of necessary defense. The American Journal of Political Science Law and Criminology, 2021, pp. 21–29.
22. Niyozova S.S. Strong emotional arousal (Effect) as a criminal law norm. The American Journal of Political Science Law and Criminology, 2021, March 31, pp. 96–102. DOI: 10.37547/tajpslc/Volume 03 Issue 03-15. –p. 96-102.
23. Sovetskoye ugolovnoye pravo [Soviet criminal law]. Eds. G.A. Krieger, N.F. Kuznetsova,
Y.M. Tkachevsky. Moscow, 1988, pp. 153–158.
