THE CONCEPT, NATURE AND ITS CHARACTERISTICS OF A SOCIALLY DANGEROUS ACTION IN CRIMINAL LAW
Keywords:
corpus delicti, necessary sign, socially dangerous act, general sign, special sign, objective laws, criminal-legal significanceAbstract
In this article, the concept of a socially dangerous movement, its structure, and signs are studied in detail. The recognition of a socially dangerous act as a necessary sign of the criminal structure and the opinions expressed by the scholars of the theory of criminal law about it are highlighted. In addition, on the basis of existing concepts in the theory of criminal law, the expression of socially dangerous actions and their specific characteristics are described in a series. At the same time, the specific importance of the general and special features of the modern theory of criminal law in the development of the concept of socially dangerous action, which is a necessary sign of the criminal structure, is described. In particular, logical, systematic, logical-legal, and comparative-legal methods of research are widely used in this article. Based on the deduction method of, the nature, structure, and signs of the socially dangerous act, which is a necessary sign of the crime structure, have been studied, and the theoretical and scientific views about it in criminal law have been reflected. Also, the main attention is focused on the concept, nature, signs, and structure of a socially dangerous act, which is a necessary sign of the criminal structure, and at the same time, on the specific criminal-legal significance of a socially dangerous act and the theoretical and practical problems related to it. The doctrine of criminal law and existing scientific research are analyzed, and reasonable theoretical suggestions and recommendations are developed in this regard.
References
1. Jinoyat huquqi (Umumiy qism) [Criminal law. (General part)]. H. Ochilov (Ed.). Tashkent, Adolat Publ., 2020, p. 26.
2. Ugolovnoye pravo Rossiyskoy Federatsii. Obshaya chast' [Criminal law of the Russian Federation. General part]. B.V. Zdravomyslov (Ed.). Moscow, 1999, p. 130.
3. Ikramov Sh.T., Kabulov R., Otajonov A. et al. Jinoyat huquqi. Maxsus qism [Criminal law. Special part]. Sh.T. Ikramov (Ed.). Tashkent, Ministry of Internal Affairs Academy of the Republic of Uzbekistan, 2016, p. 26.
4. Kudryavtsev V.N. Ob"yektivnaya storona prestupleniya [The objective side of the crime]. Moscow, Yuridicheskaya literatura Publ., 1960, p. 71.
5. Kovalev M.I., Vaskov P.T. Prichinnaya svyaz' v ugolovnom prave [Causality in criminal law]. Moscow, 1958, pp. 40–41.
6. Traynin A.N. Obscheye ucheniye o sostave prestupleniya [General doctrine of the elements of a crime]. Moscow, 1957, pp. 135–136.
7. Rustambayev M.X. Oʻzbekiston Respublikasi jinoyat huquqi kursi. Jinoyat haqida taʼlimot [Course of criminal law of the Republic of Uzbekistan. Doctrine of crime]. Tashkent, Military-technical Institute of the National Guard of the Republic of Uzbekistan, 2018, vol. 1, p. 162.
8. Kuznetsova N.F Izbrannyye trudy [Selected works]. St. Petersburg, Yuricheskiy Tsenter Press Publ., 2003, pp. 36–37.
9. Usmonaliyev M., Bakunov P. Jinoyat huquqi. Umumiy qism [Criminal law. General part]. Tashkent, Nasaf Publ., 2010, p. 173.
10. Merkushev M.P. Voprosy prichinnoy svyazi v ugolovnom prave [Issues of causality in criminal law]. Issues of Criminal Law and Process, Minsk, 1958, p. 5.
11. Samoshenko I.S. O prichinenii vreda protivopravnym bezdeystviyem [On causing harm by unlawful inaction]. Moscow, Academic Notes VIUN, 1963, vol. 17, pp. 29–40.
12. Timeyko G.V. Ponyatiye i spetsificheskiye cherty prestupnogo bezdeystviya [Concept and specific features of criminal inaction]. Moscow, Proceedings of VYUZI, 1963, vol. 2, p. 136.
13. Gaukhman L.D. Kvalifikatsiya prestupleniy: zakon, teoriya, praktika [Qualification of crimes: law, theory, practice]. Moscow, YurInfoR Publ., 2001, p. 89.
14. Ibrohimov J.A. Terrorizm bilan bogʻliq jinoyatlarga qarshi kurashishning jinoyat-huquqiy va kriminologik jihatlari [Criminal-legal and criminological aspects of combating crimes related to terrorism]. Tashkent, 2020, p. 83.
15. Timeyko G.V. Obscheye ucheniye ob ob"yektivnoy storone prestupleniya [General doctrine about the objective side of crime]. Rostov University Publ., 1977, p. 39.
16. Materials of court archive of Andijan region. 2022. Case No. 1-1715-2202/108. Pp. 54, 173, 23, 42–43.
17. Durmanov N.D. Ponyatiye prestupleniya [The concept of crime]. M.D. Shargorodsky (Ed.). Moscow, Academy of Sciences Publ., 1948, p. 54.
18. Piontkovskiy А.А. Ucheniye o prestuplenii [The doctrine of crime]. Moscow, 1961, p. 173.
19. Volkov B.S. Problema voli i ugolovnaya otvetstvennost' [The problem of will and criminal liability]. A.I. Levshin (Ed.). Kazan, Kazan Publ., 1965, p. 23.
20. Nikiforov B.S. Ob"yekt prestupleniya po sovetskomu ugolovnomu pravu [Object of crime according to Soviet criminal law]. Moscow, 1956, p. 426.
21. Аrutyunov А. Ob"yektivnaya storona prestupleniya, sovershyonnogo v souchastii [The objective side of a crime committed in complicity]. Criminal Law, 2002, no. 2, p. 4.
22. Panov N.I. Sposob soversheniya prestupleniya i ugolovnaya otvetstvennost' [Method of committing a crime and criminal liability]. Kharkov, Vishcha shkola, 1982, p. 16.
